Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Women on Board for Innovation: Lessons from the High-tech Companies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics (IPAZIA 2018)

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Building on previous research on gender diversity in corporate governance, the article empirically examines the implications of women on board for the company commitment to innovation by focusing on the presence, the critical mass and the human capital diversity of female directors. To this purpose, it relies on a unique dataset of Italian companies belonging to the high-tech industry as this context is considered male-dominated. Findings document that female directors positively affect the company commitment to innovation only when boards are characterized by a critical mass of women. Moreover, the analyses show that the human capital diversity of female directors enhances the firm commitment to innovation. Thereby, the study offers contributions to both scholars and practitioners. Indeed, it fuels the debate on the role played by women on board and emphasizes the importance of fostering the appointment of female directors, especially as critical mass. In addition, it highlights that the critical mass of female directors can exploit the benefits of gender diversity as it limits the emerging conflicts within the boardroom as well as hampers the risk-aversion, the skill underestimation and the sense of inferiority that is typical of women on board in masculine industries. Finally, the research emphasizes the relevance of mixing the diverse educational/professional backgrounds of female directors to foster the development of new ideas and improve the cross-functional discussions among board members to the benefit of company innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, B. R., & Kirchaier, T. (2013). Making it to the top: From female labour force participations to boardroom gender diversity, Financial Markets Group Discussion Paper 715, London School of Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, S. M., & Flynn, P. M. (2005). Local knowledge advances women’s access to corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 836–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arena, C., Cirillo, A., Mussolino, D., Pulcinelli, I., Saggese, S., & Sarto, F. (2015). Women on board: Evidence from a masculine industry. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 15(3), 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Bussey, K. (2004). On broadening the cognitive, motivational, and sociostructural scope of theorizing about gender development and functioning: Comment on Martin, Ruble, and Szkrybalo. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 691–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S., & Sutcliffe, K. M. (2002). Comparing alternative conceptualizations of functional diversity in management teams: Process and performance effects. Academy of Management Journal, 45(5), 875–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(3), 435–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannella, A. A., Park, J. H., & Lee, H. U. (2008). Top management team functional background diversity and firm performance: Examining the roles of team member colocation and environmental uncertainty. Academy of Management Journal, 51(4), 768–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2012). Strong evidence for gender differences in risk taking. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1), 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chau, V. S., & Quire, C. (2018). Back to the future of women in technology: Insights from understanding the shortage of women in innovation sectors for managing corporate foresight. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(6), 747–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, G., Liu, C., & Tjosvold, D. (2005). Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 277–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. L., & Hsu, W. T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Knockaert, M., & Lockett, A. (2007). Outside board members in high-tech start-ups. Small Business Economics, 29(3), 243–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dezsö, C. L., & Ross, D. G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072–1108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, A., & Sáez-Martínez, F. J. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation, Innovation. Organization and Management, 15(2), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Women and the labyrinth of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 85(9), 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erkut, S., Kramer, V.W., Konrad, A.M. (2008). Critical mass: Does the number of women on a corporate board make a difference? In: S. Vinnicombe, V. Singh, R. Burke, D. Bilimoria & M. Huse (Eds.), Women on corporate boards of directors: International research and practice, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faccio, M., Marchica, M. T., & Mura, R. (2016). CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 39, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galia, F., & Zenou, E. (2012). Board composition and forms of innovation, does diversity make a difference? European Journal of International Management, 6(6), 630–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavious, I., Segev, E., & Yosef, R. (2012). Female directors and earnings management in high-technology firms. Pacific Accounting Review, 24(1), 4–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gharbi, S., Sahut, J. M., & Teulon, F. (2014). R&D investments and high-tech firms’ stock return volatility. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 88, 306–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein, M., & Justman, M. (2000). Human capital, social capital, and public schooling. European Economic Review, 44(4), 879–890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S., & Chen, M. J. (1996). The influence of top management team heterogeneity on firms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4), 659–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyden, M. L., Sidhu, J. S., & Volberda, H. W. (2018). The conjoint influence of top and middle management characteristics on management innovation. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1505–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A. J., Cannella, A. A., Jr., & Harris, I. C. (2002). Women and racial minorities in the boardroom: How do directors differ? Journal of Management, 28(6), 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huse, M. (2007). Boards, governance and value creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jianakoplos, N. A., & Bernasek, A. (1998). Are women more risk averse? Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joecks, J., Pull, K., & Vetter, K. (2013). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance: What exactly constitutes a ‘critical mass’? Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1977). Men and women of the organization. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. (1987). Men and women of the corporation revisited. Management Review, 76(3), 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., & Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outside directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., & Rasheed, A. A. (2014). Board heterogeneity, corporate diversification and firm performance. Journal of Management Research, 14(2), 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N., & Kim, E. (2015). Board capital and exploration: From a resource provisional perspective. Management Decision, 53(9), 2156–2174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., Kramer, V., & Erkut, S. (2008). Critical mass: The impact of three or more women on corporate boards. Organizational Dynamics, 37(2), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kor, Y. (2006). Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 27(11), 1081–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, V. W., Konrad, A. M., Erkut, S., & Hooper, M. J. (2006). Critical mass on corporate boards: Why three or more women enhance governance. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), 491–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manolova, T. S., Carter, N. M., Manev, I. M., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2007). The differential effect of men and women entrepreneurs’ human capital and networking on growth expectancies in Bulgaria. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 407–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midavaine, J., Dolfsma, W., & Aalbers, R. (2016). Board diversity and R&D investment. Management Decision, 54(3), 558–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., & Triana, M. d. C. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: Mediators of the board diversity–firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 755–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). Women directors’ contribution to board decision-making and strategic involvement: The role of equality perception. European Management Review, 7(1), 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Østergaard, C. R., Timmermans, B., & Kristinsson, K. (2011). Does a different view create something new? The effect of employee diversity on innovation, Research Policy, 40(3), 500–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. A., & Philpot, J. (2007). Women’s roles on U.S. Fortune 500 boards: Director expertise and committee memberships. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(2), 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 404–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, F., & Cebula, R. J. (2015). Does the board of directors affect the extent of corporate R&D? Evidence from Italian listed companies. Economics Bulletin, 35(4), 2567–2580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruigrok, W., Peck, S., & Tacheva, S. (2007). Nationality and gender diversity on Swiss corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(4), 546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Jiménez, J. M., Fuentes-Fuentes, M. d. M., & Ruiz-Arroyo, M. (2016). Knowledge combination capability and innovation: The effects of gender diversity on top management teams in technology-based firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Jiménez, J. M., & Fuentes-Fuentes, M. d. M. (2016). Management capabilities, innovation, and gender diversity in the top management team: An empirical analysis in technology-based SMEs. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 19(2), 107–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz-Ziv, M. (2017). Gender and board activeness: The role of a critical mass. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(2), 751–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2016). Women on board: Does boardroom gender diversity really affect firm risk? Journal of Corporate Finance, 36, 26–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, V., Terjesen, S., & Vinnicombe, S. (2008). Newly appointed directors in the boardroom: How do women and men differ? European Management Journal, 26(1), 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terjesen, S., Couto, E. B., & Francisco, P. M. (2016). Does the presence of independent and female directors impact firm performance? A multi-country study of board diversity, Journal of Management & Governance, 20(3), 447–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M. (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J. H. (2009). Allowed into a man’s world’ meanings of work-life balance: Perspectives of women civil engineers as ‘minority’ workers in construction. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 37–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wincent, J., Thorgren, S., & Anokhin, S. (2014). Entrepreneurial orientation and network board diversity in network organizations. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(2), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (1996). Technology strategy and new venture performance: A study of corporate-sponsored and independent biotechnology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(4), 289–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelechowski, D. D., & Bilimoria, D. (2004). Characteristics of women and men corporate inside directors in the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(3), 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Management, Institutions, University of Naples “Federico II”, Via Cinthia, Monte S. Angelo, Naples, Italy

    Sara Saggese & Fabrizia Sarto

Authors
  1. Sara Saggese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabrizia Sarto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrizia Sarto .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Paola Paoloni

  2. Department Law and Economics of Productive Activities, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

    Rosa Lombardi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saggese, S., Sarto, F. (2019). The Role of Women on Board for Innovation: Lessons from the High-tech Companies. In: Paoloni, P., Lombardi, R. (eds) Advances in Gender and Cultural Research in Business and Economics. IPAZIA 2018. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00335-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation