Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Religious Violence

Abstract

In all the chapters we have seen the fundamental role of religion as a mobilising and often popular force against what Westerners would generally regard as modernity and progress. Especially for the Left the Uyghur (Islam) mobilisation against the ‘rational economic’ policies of the Chinese Communist State poses a classic example of this. Equally, the claims of Lebanese Muslims to reject the essentially civil equality reforms of the new divorce laws as Western Christian interference in their Islamic world (Ummah) pose problems vis-à-vis the right to dissent and respect for others’ religion and multicultural toleration. This latter example also has important implications for Northern Ireland’s inter-religious relations, officially based on multicultural relations and ‘parity of esteem’. This parity is the official policy in Northern Ireland since the Belfast Agreement (1998) as it is in Lebanon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Beales, Derek, and Geoffrey Best, eds. 1985. History, Society and the Churches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfast Agreement. 1998. Belfast: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, Isaiah. 2000. The Roots of Romanticism. London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooke, John. 1991. Science and Religion, Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burleigh, Michael. 2005. Earthly Powers. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J.C.D. 1985. English Society, 1688–1832. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha, ed. 1995. Terrorism in Context. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingley, James. 2010. Terrorism and the Politics of Social Change. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger, Stephen. 2008. The Emergence of a Scientific Culture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1991. The Consequences of Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dingley, J., Mollica, M. (2018). Conclusion. In: Dingley, J., Mollica, M. (eds) Understanding Religious Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00284-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics