Advertisement

Performance Evaluation of a RPL Hybrid Objective Function for the Smart Grid Network

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11104)

Abstract

Multiple heterogeneous communication technologies offer great opportunities in Smart grid network by using wire, wireless and optic fiber. Most of future smart meters will use Powerline Communication (PLC) technology in addition to one or more wireless interfaces to tackle the physical constraints and failure of the PLC network. When a smart meter is connected using two different technologies, choosing the best relay node and the best link to transmit the message is a key decision to provide a good quality of service and increase the reliability of the communication network. In this paper, we propose an algorithm to manage multiple interfaces at the routing level (using RPL), and a re-transmission scheme to improve the reliability of the network when a PLC interface fails.

Keywords

RPL LLN Hybrid routing Smart grid Heterogeneous networks 

References

  1. 1.
    Hauser, C.H., Bakken, D.E., Bose, A.: A failure to communicate: next generation communication requirements, technologies, and architecture for the electric power grid. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 3(2), 47–55 (2005).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MPAE.2005.1405870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Oliveira, L.G., Colen, G.R., Ribeiro, M.V., Vinck, A.J.H.: Narrow-band interference error correction in coded OFDM-based PLC systems, pp. 13–18, March 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPLC.2016.7476279
  3. 3.
    Winter, T., et al.: RPL: IPv6 routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks. RFC 6550 (Proposed Standard), Mar 2012Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Perkins, C.E., Belding-Royer, E.M., Das, S.R.: Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. RFC 3561, 1–37 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC3561
  5. 5.
    Daniel Park, D.: 6LoWPAN ad hoc on-demand distance vector routing (LOAD) (draft-daniel-6lowpan-load-adhoc-routing-03), June 2007. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-daniel-6lowpan-load-adhoc-routing-03, work in Progress
  6. 6.
    Lemercier, F., Montavont, N., Toutain, L., Vijayasankar, K., Vedantham, R., Itron, P.C.: Support for hybrid network in RPL, pp. 527–532 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartGridComm.2016.7778815
  7. 7.
    Vasseur, J., Kim, M., Pister, K., Dejean, N., Barthel, D.: Routing metrics used for path calculation in low-power and lossy networks. RFC 6551 (Proposed Standard), March 2012. http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6551.txt
  8. 8.
    Kim, Y., Bae, J.N., Kim, J.Y.: Performance of power line communication systems with noise reduction scheme for smart grid applications. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 57(1), 46–52 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ben Saad, L., Chauvenet, C., Tourancheau, B.: Heterogeneous IPv6 infrastructure for smart energy efficient building, September 2011. https://hal.inria.fr/hal-00646061
  10. 10.
    Ben-Shimol, Y., Zohar, Y.: Routing in large realistic PLC smart-grids, pp. 1–6, April 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPLC.2017.7897115
  11. 11.
    Pignolet, Y.A., Rinis, I., Dzung, D., Karaagac, A.: Heterogeneous multi-interface routing: networking stack and simulator extensions, pp. 1–6 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1109/MASS.2012.6708526
  12. 12.
    Ropitault, T., Lampropulos, A., Pelov, A., Toutain, L., Vedantham, R., Chiummiento, P.: Doing it right - recommendations for RPL in PLC-based networks for the smart grid, pp. 452–457 (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartGridComm.2014.7007688

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Itron, IMT Atlantique, IRISA, UBLCesson SevignéFrance
  2. 2.IMT Atlantique, IRISA, UBLCesson SevignéFrance

Personalised recommendations