Advertisement

Blockchain in the Construction Sector: A Socio-technical Systems Framework for the Construction Industry

  • Jennifer LiEmail author
  • David Greenwood
  • Mohamad Kassem
Conference paper

Abstract

Distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) including blockchain are increasingly being investigated as a potential solution to address many of the challenges hindering the construction industry’s performance such as collaboration, information sharing and intellectual property rights. Existing studies addressing blockchain applications within construction and the built environment have ignored the interrelation of social and technological dimensions. To address this gap, this paper proposes a multi-dimensional emergent framework for DLT adoption within the construction sector. The framework was developed following a focus group discussion and took a socio-technical systems approach that encompasses three dimensions: political, social and technical. The framework was overlaid with an extensive set of construction-related challenges and opportunities and identified a number of associated agents across the dimensions. The structured and inter-connected dimensions provided by the framework can be used by field researchers as a point of departure to investigate a range of research questions from political, social or technical perspectives.

Keywords

Blockchain Distributed ledger technology Construction industry Built environment Socio-technical systems 

References

  1. 1.
    Barima, O.: Leveraging the blockchain technology to improve construction value delivery: the opportunities, benefits and challenges. In: Hall, K. (ed.) Construction Projects, pp. 93–112. Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, USA (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cardeira, H.: Smart contracts and possible applications to the construction industry. In: New Perspectives in Construction Law Conference on New Perspectives in Construction Law Conference, Bucharest (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mason, J., Escott, H: Smart contracts in construction: views and perceptions of stakeholders. In Proceedings of FIG Conference, Istanbul May 2018. [In Press], Available from: http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/35123 (2018)
  4. 4.
    Merschbrock, C.: Unorchestrated symphony: the case of inter-organizational collaboration in digital construction design. Electron. J. Inf. Technol. Constr. 17, 333–350 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oesterreich, T.D., Teuteberg, F.: Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput. Ind. 83, 121–139 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    Succar, B., Kassem, M.: Macro-BIM adoption: conceptual structures. Autom. Constr. 57, 64–79 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathews, M., Robles, D., Bowe, B.: BIM + Blockchain: a solution to the trust problem in collaboration? In: CITA BIM Gathering 2017, Dublin, Ireland (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Heiskanen, A.: The technology of trust: how the internet of things and blockchain could usher in a new era of construction productivity The technology of trust: how the internet of things and blockchain could. Constr. Res. Innov. 8, 66–70 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Christidis, K., Devetsikiotis, M.: Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access. 4, 2292–2303 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakamoto, S.: Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Www.Bitcoin.Org. 9 (2008)
  12. 12.
    Mengelkamp, E., Gärttner, J., Rock, K., Kessler, S., Orsini, L., Weinhardt, C.: Designing microgrid energy markets: a case study: The Brooklyn Microgrid. Appl. Energy 210, 870–880 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Azaria, A., Ekblaw, A., Vieira, T., Lippman, A.: MedRec: using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. In: Proceedings of the 2016 2nd International Conference on Open Big Data, OBD 2016, pp. 25–30 (2016)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kogure, J., Kamakura, K., Shima, T., Kubo, T.: Blockchain technology for next generation ICT. Fujitsu Sci. Tech. J. 53, 56–61 (2017)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Mason, J.: Intelligent contracts and the construction industry. J. Leg. Aff. Dispute Resolut. Eng. Constr. 9, 4517012 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zheng, Z., Xie, S., Dai, H.N., Wang, H.: Blockchain challenges and opportunities: a survey. Work Pap.–2016 (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Danilin, P.I., Lukin, A.A., Reshetova, E.N.: Assessment organization service based on Ethereum platform. In: Cavalli, A.R., Petrenko, A., Pozin, B. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Actual Problems of System and Software Engineering, pp. 291–294, Moscow, Russia (2017)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Li, J., Greenwood, D.J., Kassem, M.: Blockchain in the built environment: analysing current applications and developing an emergent framework. In: Creative Construction Conference 2018 (2018)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Catlow, R.: Artists Re: thinking the blockchain introduction. In: Catlow, R., Garrett, M., Jones, M., Skinner, S. (eds.) Artists Re: Thinking the Blockchain, pp. 21–37. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool (2017)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kiviat, T.I.: Beyond bitcoin: issues in regulating blockchain transactions. Duke Law J. 65, 569–608 (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Atzori, M.: Blockchain technology and decentralized governance: is the state still necessary? SSRN Electron. J. (2015)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hamida, E.B., Brousmiche, K.L., Levard, H., Thea, E.: Blockchain for enterprise: overview, opportunities and challenges. In: Thirteenth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications (ICWMC 2017), pp. 83–88 (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kypriotaki, K.N., Zamani, E.D., Giaglis, G.M.: From bitcoin to decentralized autonomous corporations: extending the application scope of decentralized peer-to-peer networks and blockchains. Presented at the (2015)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Swan, M.: Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy. O’Reilly Media Inc, Sebastoplo, CA (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karafiloski, E., Mishev, A.: Blockchain solutions for big data challenges: a literature review. In: IEEE EUROCON 2017–17th International Conference on Smart Technologies, pp. 763–768, Ohrid, Macedonia (2017)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Biswas, K., Muthukkumarasamy, V.: Securing Smart Cities Using Blockchain Technology <Go to ISI>://WOS:000401700900187 (2016)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A.: Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin is Changing Money, Business, and the World. Penguin, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Yermack, D.: Corporate governance and blockchains. Rev. Financ. 21, 7–31 (2017)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nofer, M., Gomber, P., Hinz, O., Schiereck, D.: Blockchain. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59, 183–187 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boucher, P., Nascimento, S., Kritikos, M.: How Blockchain Technology Could Change Our Lives: In-depth Analysis. European Parliament (2017)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mylrea, M., Gourisetti, S.N.G.: Blockchain for smart grid resilience: exchanging distributed energy at speed, scale and security. Resilience Week (RWS). 18–23 (2017)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ølnes, S., Ubacht, J., Janssen, M.: Blockchain in government: benefits and implications of distributed ledger technology for information sharing. Gov. Inf. Q. 34, 355–364 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sun, J., Yan, J., Zhang, K.Z.K.: Blockchain-based sharing services: what blockchain technology can contribute to smart cities. Financ. Innov. 26 (2016)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Maupin, J.: The G20 countries should engage with blockchain technologies to build an inclusive, transparent, and accountable digital economy for all. Economics Discussion Papers (2017)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    NEO: NEO White paper: a distributed network for the smart economy. http://docs.neo.org/en-us/index.html
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
  39. 39.
    Shin, D.: A socio-technical framework for internet-of-things design: a human-centered design for the internet of things. Telematics. Inform. 31, 519–531 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Baxter, G., Sommerville, I.: Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact. Comput. 23, 4–17 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Geels, F.W.: From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems. Res. Policy 33, 897–920 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kshetri, N.: Will blockchain emerge as a tool to break the poverty chain in the Global South? Third World Q. 38, 1710–1732 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ammous, S.H.: Blockchain technology: what is it good for? SSRN Electron. J (2016)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kovic, M.: Blockchain for the people: blockchain technology as the basis for a secure and reliable e-voting system. Zurich, Switzerland (2017)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Pieroni, A., Scarpato, N., Di Nunzio, L., Fallucchi, F., Raso, M.: Smarter city: smart energy grid based on blockchain technology. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 8, 298–306 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Hou, H.: The application of blockchain technology in e-government in China. In: 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN), 2017, pp. 1–4. IEEE, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2017)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yuan, Y., Wang, F.-Y.: Towards blockchain-based intelligent transportation systems. In: 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2663–2668. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. (2016)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kang, J., Yu, R., Huang, X., Maharjan, S., Zhang, Y., Hossain, E.: Enabling localized peer-to-peer electricity trading among plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using consortium blockchains. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 13, 3154–3164 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wang, J., Wu, P., Wang, X.Y., Shou, W.C.: The outlook of blockchain technology for construction engineering management. Front. Eng. Manag. 4, 67–75 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kinnaird, C., Geipel, M.: Blockchain technology: how the inventions behind bitcoin are enabling a network of trust for the built environment. https://www.arup.com/publications/research/section/blockchaintechnology (2018)
  51. 51.
    Tapscott, D., Tapscott, A.: How blockchain will change organizations. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 58, 9–13 (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northumbria UniversityNewcastleUK

Personalised recommendations