Abstract
As development and implementation of the Internet of Things (IoT) and embedded systems technologies increase, there is the need for a design framework that allows for thorough exploration of potential designs while detecting any potential risks and security violations. Without verification and validation, assuring that system security requirements are properly enforced becomes as tedious as it is hazardous. Our work proposes the use of a novel security development framework for exploration of secure embedded system designs. In this manner we are able to ensure that security functional and architectural requirements are maintained without the introduction of additional risk factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Jürjens, J. (2005). Secure systems development with UML. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
SysML Sec. http://sysml-sec.telecom-paristech.fr
Jürjens, J. (2002). UMLsec: Extending UML for secure systems development, UML 2002 the unified modeling language (pp. 412–425). Berlin: Springer Publishing.
Sadeghi, A., Visconti, I., & Wachsmann, C. (2009). Anonymizer-enabled security and privacy for RFID. In International Conference on Cryptology and Network Security (pp. 134–153). Berlin: Springer.
Abidin, A., Matsuura, K., & Mitrokotsa, A. (2014). Security of a privacy-preserving biometric authentication protocol revisited. In International Conference on Cryptology and Network Security (pp. 290–304). Cham: Springer.
Dong, C., & Kiefer, F. (2015). Secure set-based policy checking and its application to password registration. In International Conference on Cryptology and Network Security (pp. 59–74). Cham: Springer.
Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A. (2007). Quo Vadis, SLD? Reasoning about the trends and challenges of system level design. Proceedings of the IEEE, 95(3), 467–506.
Feiler, P. (2010). SAE AADL V2: An overview. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University.
AADL Tools. https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/aadl/index.php/AADL\tools
Ellison, R., Householder, A., Hudak, J., Kazman, R., & Woody, C. (2015). Extending AADL for security design assurance of cyber-physical systems. Pittsburgh: Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University CMU/SEI-2015-TR-014.
Delange, J., Feiler, P., Klieber, W., Nam, M., & Seibel, J. AADL security annex. https://github.com/saeaadl/userdays/blob/master/UserDays/May2016/security-annex-May2016.pdf
Delange, J., Nam, M., & Seibel, J. AADL security analysis tools. https://github.com/saeaadl/userdays/blob/master/UserDays/May2016/security-analysis-May2016.pdf
Feiler, P. Automated assurance of security-policy enforcement in critical systems. https://insights.sei.cmu.edu/seiblog/2018/02/automated-assurance-of-security-policy-enforcement-in-critical-systems.html
AASPE AADL Github. https://github.com/cmu-sei/AASPE
Ferrante, A., Milosevic, J., & Janjusévić, M. (2013). A security-enhanced design methodology for embedded systems. In International Conference on Security and Cryptography (SECRYPT).
Alisa User Guide. https://rawgit.com/osate/alisa/develop/org.osate.alisa.help/contents/00-Main.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wortman, P.A., Chandy, J.A. (2019). Framework for Design Exploration of Secure Embedded System Development. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_39
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_39
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00113-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00114-8
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)