Skip to main content

The Danger of Using Ratio Performance Metrics in System Evaluations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems Engineering in Context
  • 744 Accesses

Abstract

As we delve further into the data science/big data era, we create more and more forecasts or predictions for systems evaluation applications. Many practitioners use ratio variables as performance metrics, one of the most common being the benefit/cost (B/C) ratio of alternatives; however, ratio metrics are used extensively throughout disparate industries. There is significant risk associated with using ratio metrics, and in this paper, we focus on one simple trap that can result from forecasting a ratio metric. We illustrate and motivate the issues with a stylized television-viewing index forecasting problem and with two examples using real-world data. Our goal in this paper is to make systems practitioners aware of these pitfalls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blank, L., & Tarquin, A. (2005). Engineering economy. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen, K. H., & Shimerda, T. A. (1981). An empirical analysis of useful financial ratios. Financial Management, 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shirata, C. Y. (1998). Financial ratios as predictors of bankruptcy in Japan: an empirical research. In Proceedings of the second Asian Pacific interdisciplinary research in accounting conference (pp. 437–445).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yeh, Q. J. (1996). The application of data envelopment analysis in conjunction with financial ratios for bank performance evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 47(8), 980–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gibson, J. E., Scherer, W. T., Gibson, W. F., & Smith, M. C. (2016). How to do systems analysis: Primer and casebook. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Casella, G., & Berger, R. L. (2002). Statistical inference (Vol. 2). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kendall, M., Stuart, A., Ord, J. K., & O’Hagan, A. (1994). Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics, volume 1: Distribution theory (6th ed.). Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seltman, H. (2017). Approximations for mean and variance of a ratio. www.stat.cmu.edu/~hseltman/files/ratio.pdf

  9. Michalski, R. S., Carbonell, J. G., & Mitchell, T. M. (2013). Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach. Berlin, Germany: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Clemen, R. T., & Reilly, T. (2013). Making hard decisions with decision tools. Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Adams .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Scherer, W.T., Adams, S. (2019). The Danger of Using Ratio Performance Metrics in System Evaluations. In: Adams, S., Beling, P., Lambert, J., Scherer, W., Fleming, C. (eds) Systems Engineering in Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00114-8_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics