Skip to main content

Didactic Methodologies Used in Industrial Design and Mechanical Engineering for the Implementation of the Marked Competencies and Their Professional Insertion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Trends in Educational Activity in the Field of Mechanism and Machine Theory

Part of the book series: Mechanisms and Machine Science ((Mechan. Machine Science,volume 64))

Abstract

Since the academic year 2010–11 the Technical University of Madrid (UPM), University Carlos III of Madrid (UC3M) and the Salesianos Atocha College (CSA), have been steadil working on teaching their subjects through the Project-Oriented Learning (POL) methodology. Later they also implemented more didactics methodologies in order to achieve a higher development in the competences of students. These schools incorporated Service-Learning (SL), and several other tools such as Dynamic Technical Documentation (DTD), Google Sites and Moodle. Other teaching methodologies have been added since the academic year 2014–15 in order to further improve the training of students, which pay special attention to training units which are particularly difficult to understand. To this end, didactic methodologies such as Kounaikenshuu, Flipped Classroom, and tools such as Portfolio, Plickers and Kahoot! all aimed at improving the quality of the Bachelor Final Thesis. The implementation of these new didactic methodologies not only improved students’ academic training (32% improvement in UPM, 14% in theoretical training and 33% in practical training in CSA) but also achieved the competencies marked for the double Degree in Design and Mechanical Engineering at UPM and Industrial Mechatronics in the CSA These results were also confirmed by the satisfaction surveys carried out by the collaborating partners of the projects which showed improvements of between 19% and 43% in theoretical training and between 53% and 68% in practical training at UPM, whereas in CSA, the improvement in theoretical training was 22% and 85% in practical training according to the criterion of the partner-collaborators. Professors and teachers from both institutions said that the implementation of these methodologies caused them to be overworked due to the excessive number of students but on the other hand, they also improved their teaching competencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sein-Echaluce, M.L., Fidalgo-Blanco, A., Alves, A.Y.: Technology behaviors in education innovation. Comput. Hum. Behav. 72, 596–598 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tippelt, R., Lindemann, H.: El método de proyectos. El Salvador (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bush, V.: Science: the endless frontier. Trans. Kans. Acad. Sci. 48(3), 231–264 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Keating, D., Stanford, T.G.: An innovative strategy to integrate relevant graduate professional education for engineers in industry with continual technological innovation. In: SEE Annual Conference Proceedings (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciampi, M.M., Da Brito, C.R.: Awareness of social impact of engineering: the task for engineering schools. American Society for Engineering Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Da Brito, C.R., Ciampi, M.M.: The discussions after the Bologna process in Europe: the global engineer. American Society for Engineering Education (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tao, Y.P., Wang, X.B., Li, K.Q., Liang, Z.: Assessing Chinese engineering graduates’ abilities for problem-solving, scientific discovery and technological innovation from a professoriate perspective. Age 5, 1 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Seery, N., Donal C., Dunbar, R.J.: Maximising the impact of creative and innovative activities within the constraints of defined educational structures. In: ASEE Conference and Exposition. American Society for Engineering Education, Louisville (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Islam, R.: Engineering and technology education in Bangladesh: comparative study of the public and private universities for problems and prospects. In: Conference Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vaezi-Nejad, S.M., Cullinan, M., Bishop, P.: Telematics education I: teaching, learning and assessment at postgraduate level. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 42(2), 132–146 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Godfrey, D.: A new approach to teaching introduction to electrical engineering at the United States coast guard academy. In: ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, W., Huiru S., Mo, Y.-L.: Integration of cognitive instructions and problem/project-based learning into civil engineering curriculum to cultivate creativity and self-directed learning skills. American Society for Engineering Education (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Blaya, F., Nuere, S., Soriano, E., García, J.M., Islán, M. Implementation of a methodology project oriented learning (POL) on specific subjects of bachelor and master in industrial design. In: ICERI Annual Conference Proceedings (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Garcia, J.M., Soriano, E., Garcia, I., Rubio, H.: Implementation of service-learning projects in engineering colleges. Int. J. Electr. Eng. Educ. 29(5), 1119–1125 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. de Miguel Díaz, M.: Modalidades de enseñanza centradas en el desarrollo de competencias. Orientaciones para promover el cambio metodológico en el Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. García-Alonso .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

García-Alonso, J.M., Soriano-Heras, E., Blaya, F., Rubio, H. (2019). Didactic Methodologies Used in Industrial Design and Mechanical Engineering for the Implementation of the Marked Competencies and Their Professional Insertion. In: García-Prada, J., Castejón, C. (eds) New Trends in Educational Activity in the Field of Mechanism and Machine Theory . Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 64. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00108-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00108-7_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-00107-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-00108-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics