Skip to main content

Why Functional Genomics Is the Central Concern of Biology and the Hard Problem of Abiogenesis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1054 Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

Life has many defining characteristics, not the least of which is that it exists in a self-perpetuating homeostatic state that is far from thermodynamic equilibrium. However, since the universe contains many abiotic dissipative structures that are far from thermodynamic equilibrium, that alone cannot be taken to be definitive of life, at least not life on earth as we know it. What distinguishes the latter from nonlife, and hence biology as a science distinct from chemistry and physics, is genomic information, i.e., the information encoded in DNA. Living systems do what they do only by virtue of that information. As Robert Rosen showed by mathematical abstraction, life is a complex self-entailing system of metabolism, repair, and replication, and organisms embody modeling relations with their environment. In all known organisms, metabolism, repair, and replication require a genome, which informs the entailments through which the organism relates and adapts to its environment. Biologists came to recognize this in the latter part of the twentieth century, and hence the cutting edge of biology is now focused almost entirely on genomics (and its derivatives such as epigenomics). With genomic information as its central concern, biology is a historical as much as a physical science. Life cannot be reduced to chemistry and physics because genomically informed modeling relations are physically indeterminate and context-dependent, with historical contingency being an irreducible part of the relevant context. As a result, the science of paleontology is essential for reconstructing the evolutionary development of life on earth. This then constitutes the hard problem for the origin-of-life discourse: the sequence of contingencies that produced the first functional genome is not well preserved in the fossil record. Therefore, the problem of abiogenesis will probably remain unsolved and a matter of speculation until we learn how to create a true (i.e., genomically informed) organism from scratch.

What I cannot create I do not understand

– Richard Feynman, on his blackboard a the time of his death, February 1988

Perhaps the first lesson to be learned from biology is that there are lessons to be learned from biology

– Robert Rosen, Essays on Life Itself, Chapter 18.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamala, K & Szostak, JW. Nonenzymatic template-directed RNA synthesis inside model protocells. Science 2013; 342: 1098–1100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alon, U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 2007; 8: 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boveri, T. Uber mehrpolige Mitosen als Mittel zur Analzyse des Zellkerns. Verhandlungen der physicalish-medizinischen Gesselschaft zu Wurzburg. Neu Folge 1902; 35: 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. How Peircean semiotic philosophy connects Western science with Eastern emptiness ontology. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2017; 131: 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Britten, RJ & Davidson, EH. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science 1969; 165: 349–357.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, JA. Developmental ascendency: from bottom-up to top-down control. Biol Theor 2006; 1: 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, JA. Information as a manifestation of development. Information 2011; 2: 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, JA. On the meaning of chance in biology. Biosemiotics 2014; 7: 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley, SD, Smith, E & Morowitz, HJ. The origin of the RNA world: Co-evolution of genes and metabolism. Bioorg Chem 2007; 35: 430–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damer, B. A Field Trip to the Archaean in Search of Darwin’s Warm Little Pond. Life (Basel) 2016; 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection (John Murray, London, 1859).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, EH. The Regulatory Genome: Gene Regulatory Networks in Development and Evolution (Academic Press/Elsevier, San Diego, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, EH. Network design principles from the sea urchin embryo. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2009; 19: 535–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djokic, T, Van Kranendonk, MJ, Campbell, KA, Walter, MR & Ward, CR. Earliest signs of life on land preserved in ca. 3.5 Ga hot spring deposits. Nat Commun 2017; 8: 15263.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. Nothing in Biology Makes Sense except in the Light of Evolution. The American Biology Teacher 1973; 35: 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, MS, Papineau, D, Grenne, T, Slack, JF, Rittner, M, Pirajno, F et al. Evidence for early life in Earth’s oldest hydrothermal vent precipitates. Nature 2017; 543: 60–64.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, DH, Laflamme, M, Tweedt, SM, Sperling, EA, Pisani, D & Peterson, KJ. The Cambrian conundrum: early divergence and later ecological success in the early history of animals. Science 2011; 334: 1091–1097.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, E. Biosemiotics and self-reference from Peirce to Rosen. Eighth Annual Gatherings in Biosemiotics, 2008; University of the Aegean, Syros, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glansdorff, N, Xu, Y & Labedan, B. The last universal common ancestor: emergence, constitution and genetic legacy of an elusive forerunner. Biol Direct 2008; 3: 29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A & Seckl, J. Glucocorticoids, prenatal stress and the programming of disease. Horm Behav 2011; 59: 279–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, CA, 3rd, Chuang, RY, Noskov, VN, Assad-Garcia, N, Deerinck, TJ, Ellisman, MH et al. Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science 2016; 351: aad6253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, F & Monod, J. Genetic regulatory mechanisms in the synthesis of proteins. J Mol Biol 1961; 3: 318–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, SA. Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution (Oxford University Press, New York, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koonin, EV. Comparative genomics, minimal gene-sets and the last universal common ancestor. Nat Rev Microbiol 2003; 1: 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koonin, EV. CarlWoese’s vision of cellular evolution and the domains of life. RNA Biol 2014; 11: 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laubichler, MD & Davidson, EH. Boveri’s long experiment: sea urchin merogones and the establishment of the role of nuclear chromosomes in development. Dev Biol 2008; 314: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin WF, Weiss MC, Neukirchen S, Nelson-Sathi S & Sousa FL. Physiology, phylogeny, and LUCA. Microb Cell 2016; 3: 582–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulecky, DC. Robert Rosen: the well-posed question and its answer—why are organisms different from machines? Systems Research and Behavioral Science, ISSN 1099-1743 2000; 17: 419–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J. Chance and Necessity: An Essay on the Natural Philosophy of Modern Biology (Vintage, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  • Monod, J & Jacob, F. Teleonomic mechanisms in cellular metabolism, growth, and differentiation. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 1961; 26: 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutman, AP, Bennett, VC, Friend, CR, Van Kranendonk, MJ & Chivas, AR. Rapid emergence of life shown by discovery of 3,700-million-year-old microbial structures. Nature 2016; 537: 535–538.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Pasteur, L. Sur les corpuscules organisés qui existent dans l’atmosphère: Examen de la doctrine des générations spontanées. Leçon Professée a la Société Chimique de Paris 1861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattee, HH. The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut. Biosystems 2001; 60: 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, IS & Davidson, EH. Genomic Control Process: Development and Evolution (Academic Press, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peter, IS & Davidson, EH. Implications of Developmental Gene Regulatory Networks Inside and Outside Developmental Biology. Curr Top Dev Biol 2016; 117: 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, IS & Davidson, EH. Assessing regulatory information in developmental gene regulatory networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114: 5862–5869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, KJ, Cotton, JA, Gehling, JG & Pisani, D. The Ediacaran emergence of bilaterians: congruence between the genetic and the geological fossil records. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363: 1435–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, KJ, Dietrich, MR & McPeek, MA. MicroRNAs and metazoan macroevolution: insights into canalization, complexity, and the Cambrian explosion. Bioessays 2009; 31: 736–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. Anticipatory Systems: Philosophical, Mathematical and Methodological Foundations (Pergamon Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. Life Itself: A Comprehensive Inquiry into the Nature, Origin, and Fabrication of Life (Columbia University Press, New York, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, R. Essays on Life Itself (Columbia University Press, New York, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, SN. Development and Evolution: Complexity and Change in Biology (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. What is Life? (Cambridge University Press, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoval, O & Alon, U. SnapShot: network motifs. Cell 2010; 143: 326–e321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E & Morowitz, HJ. Universality in intermediary metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004; 101: 13168–13173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, KA. Developmental stress and social phenotypes: integrating neuroendocrine, behavioural and evolutionary perspectives. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2017; 372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, RE. Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz, RE. Ecology, the Ascendent Perspective (eds. Allen, T. F. H. & Roberts, D. W.) (Columbia University Press, New York, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetsigian, K, Woese, C & Goldenfeld, N. Collective evolution and the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006; 103: 10696–10701.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, SI & Davies, PC. The algorithmic origins of life. J R Soc Interface 2012; 10: 20120869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, JD & Crick, FH. Molecular structure of nucleic acids; a structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid. Nature 1953a; 171: 737–738.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, JD & Crick, FH. Genetical implications of the structure of deoxyribonucleic acid. Nature 1953b; 171: 964–967.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, MC, Sousa, FL, Mrnjavac, N, Neukirchen, S, Roettger, M, Nelson-Sathi, S et al. The physiology and habitat of the last universal common ancestor. Nat Microbiol 2016; 1: 16116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, BM, Heimberg, AM, Moy, VN, Sperling, EA, Holstein, TW, Heber, S et al. The deep evolution of metazoan microRNAs. Evol Dev 2009; 11: 50–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woese, CR & Fox, GE. Phylogenetic structure of the prokaryotic domain: the primary kingdoms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977; 74: 5088–5090.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank Dr. Kevin Peterson for helpful comments on an initial draft of this paper and an autonomous reviewer for suggestions that greatly improved the final manuscript. Work in my laboratory is supported by grants from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (NIGMS) of the National Institutes of Health (P20GM103423 and P20GM104318).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James A. Coffman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Coffman, J.A. (2019). Why Functional Genomics Is the Central Concern of Biology and the Hard Problem of Abiogenesis. In: Georgiev, G., Smart, J., Flores Martinez, C., Price, M. (eds) Evolution, Development and Complexity. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00075-2_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics