Skip to main content

The Influence of the Laparoscopic Approach in Abdominal Surgery: The Third Surgical Revolution

  • Chapter
Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair
  • 264 Accesses

Abstract

In the mid-1980s, general (abdominal) surgery was relatively stagnant and at risk of being overshadowed by non-surgical specialties performing less invasive procedures for what had previously been major “open” surgical operations. These challenges to general surgery included flexible endoscopy (removal of mucosal tumours and endoscopic treatment of choledocholithiasis, management of gastrointestinal hemorrhage, endoscopic placement of feeding tubes, etc.) and interventional radiology (percutaneous drainage of abscesses, biopsy of tumor masses, etc.). Furthermore, great efforts were being made to develop non-invasive treatment of gallstones by using extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and gallstone dissolution agents. In the late 1980s, surgeons in Germany, France and the United States, working independently, began performing procedures that would revolutionize the practice of general surgery. Using traditional laparoscopic instruments and techniques (CO2 pneumoperitoneum, trocar/sheath assemblies and long narrow instruments), but coupling the laparoscope to a CCD-video camera, the first laparoscopic cholecystectomies were performed. Although the academic community was slow to embrace the development, practicing surgeons and patients alike rapidly accepted and even demanded this new “minimally invasive” approach to the treatment of gallstones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Payne JH, Grininger LM, Izawa MT, et al. Laparoscopic or open inguinal herniorrhaphy? A randomized propective trial. Arch Surg 1994; 129; 973–979.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Trondseu E, Reiertsen O, Andersen OK, Kjaersgeard P. Laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized study. Eur J Surg 1993; 159: 217–221.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shea JA, Healey MJ, Berlin JA, et al. Mortality and complications associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 1996; 224: 609–620.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sietses C, Havenith CEG, Eijsbouts QAJ, et al. Laparoscopic surgery preserves monocyte-mediated tumour cell killing in contrast to the conventional approach. Surg Endose 2000; 14: 456–460.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Allendorph JDF, Bessler M, Cayton ML, et al. Increased tumour establishment and growth after laparotomy versus laparoscopy in a murine model. Arch Surg 1995; 130:649–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cameron JL, Pitt HA, Yeo CJ, et al. 145 consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies without mortality. Ann Surg 1993; 217: 430–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, et al. Randomized controled trial of laparoscopic versus minicholecystectomy. Lancet 1992; 340:1116–1119.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McMahon AJ, Russell IT, Baxter JN, et al. Laparoscopic versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy; A randomized trial. Lancet 1994; 343:135–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Steiner CA, Bass EB, Tallamini MA, Pitt HA, Steinberg EP. Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland. N Eng J Med 1994; 330: 403–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nilsson G, Larsson S, Johnsson F, Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open fundoplication; Blind evaluation of recovery and discharge. Brit J Surg 2000; 87: 873–878.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Laine S, Rantala A, Gullichsen R, Ovaska J. Laparoscopic versus conventional Nissen fundoplication. A prospective, randomized study. Surg Endosc 1997; 11: 441–444.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Soper, N.J. (2003). The Influence of the Laparoscopic Approach in Abdominal Surgery: The Third Surgical Revolution. In: Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0752-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0752-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-59755-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0752-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics