Advertisement

Technique d’implantation d’une électrode de stimulation médullaire chirurgicale

  • Philippe RigoardEmail author
  • Philippe Cam

Résumé

Il existe de nombreux modèles d’)électrodes de stimulation médullaire. Au-delà de l’indication proprement dite et du processus de sélection des patients, leurs caractéristiques volumétriques, surfaciques et leurs propriétés électriques conditionnent en tout ou partie leur pose. Il est donc délicat mais essentiel pour le chirurgien implanteur

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. 1.
    North RB, Kidd DH, Olin J, et al. (2006) Spinal Cord Stimulation for Axial Low Back Pain: A Prospective Controlled Trial Comparing 16-Contact Insulated Electrodes with 4-Contact Percutaneous Electrodes: Comparison of SCS Electrodes for Low Back Pain. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface 9: 56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holsheimer J, Wesselink WA (1997) Optimum electrode geometry for spinal cord stimulation: the narrow bipole and tripole. Med Biol Eng Comput 35: 493–497CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Struijk JJ, Holsheimer J (1996) Transverse tripolar spinal cord stimulation: theoretical performance of a dual channel system. Med Biol Eng Comput 34: 273–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holsheimer J, Wesselink WA (1997) Effect of anode-cathode configuration on paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 41: 654–659; discussion 659–660PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oakley JC, Espinosa F, Bothe H, et al. (2006) Transverse Tripolar Spinal Cord Stimulation: Results of an International Multicenter Study. Neuromodulation J Int Neuromodulation Soc 9: 192–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rigoard P, Jacques L, Delmotte A, et al. (2014) An Algorithmic Programming Approach for Back Pain Symptoms in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Using Spinal Cord Stimulation with a Multicolumn Surgically Implanted Epidural Lead: A Multicenter International Prospective Study. Pain PractGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim DD, Vakharyia R, Kroll HR, Shuster A (2011) Rates of lead migration and stimulation loss in spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective comparison of laminotomy versus percutaneous implantation. Pain Physician 14: 513–524PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sankarasubramanian V, Buitenweg JR, Holsheimer J, Veltink PH (2013) Staggered transverse tripoles with quadripolar lateral anodes using percutaneous and surgical leads in spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 72: 483–491CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rigoard P, Delmotte A, D’Houtaud S, et al. (2012) Back pain: a real target for spinal cord stimulation? Neurosurgery 70: 574–584; discussion 584–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rigoard P, Delmotte A, Moles A, et al. (2012) Successful treatment of pudendal neuralgia with tricolumn spinal cord stimulation: case report. Neurosurgery 71: E757–762; discussion E763CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cameron T (2004) Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 100: 254–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bendersky D, Yampolsky C (2013) Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Safe? A Review of Its Complications. World NeurosurgGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mathew L, Winfree C, Miller-Saultz D, Sonty N (2010) Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulator trial may be used as a screening tool prior to spinal cord stimulator implantation. Pain 150: 327–331CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park P, Foley KT (2008) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis: technique and outcomes after a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up. Neurosurg Focus 25: E16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holly LT, Schwender JD, Rouben DP, Foley KT (2006) Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: indications, technique, and complications. Neurosurg Focus 20: E6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Beems T, van Dongen RTM (2006) Use of a tubular retractor system as a minimally invasive technique for epidural plate electrode placement under local anesthesia for spinal cord stimulation: technical note. Neurosurgery 58: ONS-E177; discussion ONS-E177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rigoard P, Luong AT, Delmotte A, et al. (2013) Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation lead implantation using an optic transligamentar minimally invasive technique. Neurosurgery 73: 550–553CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vangeneugden J (2007) Implantation of surgical electrodes for spinal cord stimulation: classical midline laminotomy technique versus minimal invasive unilateral technique combined with spinal anaesthesia. Acta Neurochir Suppl 97: 111–114PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Paris 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Unité rachis-neurostimulation, service de neurochirurgieCHU de PoitiersFrance
  2. 2.N3lab (Neuromodulation and Neural Networks)CHU de PoitiersFrance
  3. 3.Inserm CIC 802CHU de PoitiersFrance

Personalised recommendations