Skip to main content

Patient Selection for Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technical Aspects of Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer

Abstract

The aim of focal therapy is to offer selected patients with prostate cancer (PCa) better control of their disease and lower treatment-related morbidity. Whole-mount prostate treatment is often associated with urinary incontinence (5–20 %), erectile dysfunction (30–70 %), and bowel toxicity (5–10 %). Treating the correct population by proper patient selection is certainly the cornerstone of this new prostate cancer treatment strategy. Although there are still no high-level evidence studies at the moment, several retrospective or noncontrolled prospective series draw the lines for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selection has to balance between the risk of overtreatment of nonthreatening disease where active surveillance has proven to be a safe strategy, and an inefficient strategy for potentially harmful disease that might require multimodal strategies, including whole-mount prostate treatment (radical prostatectomy or external beam therapy). We base our recommendations on previous and long-running trials and three consensus meetings organized around prostate cancer focal therapy. The main features to focus on are the patient’s general health condition, classic prostate cancer criteria for risk stratification, and, more specific to focal therapy, cancer topography into the gland. At the margin of current admitted application of focal therapy but still in the field of patient selection, we mention the role of focal therapy as a salvage treatment after external beam radiation therapy or brachytherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, Sandler HM, Northouse L, Hembroff L, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(12):1250–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, Kane RL. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(6):435–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eggener SE, Scardino PT, Carroll PR, Zelefsky MJ, Sartor O, Hricak H, et al. Focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: a critical appraisal of rationale and modalities. J Urol. 2007;178(6):2260–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. De la Rosette J, Ahmed H, Barentsz J, Johansen TB, Brausi M, Emberton M, et al. Focal therapy in prostate cancer-report from a consensus panel. J Endourol. 2010;24(5):775–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van den Bos W, Muller BG, Ahmed H, Bangma CH, Barret E, Crouzet S, et al. Focal therapy in prostate cancer: international multidisciplinary consensus on trial design. Eur Urol. 2014;65(6):1078–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, et al. ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(4):746–57.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Valerio M, Ahmed HU, Emberton M, Lawrentschuk N, Lazzeri M, Montironi R, et al. The role of focal therapy in the management of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2014;66(4):732–51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Langley S, Ahmed HU, Al-Qaisieh B, Bostwick D, Dickinson L, Veiga FG, et al. Report of a consensus meeting on focal low dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012;109 Suppl 1:7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmed HU, Akin O, Coleman JA, Crane S, Emberton M, Goldenberg L, et al. Transatlantic consensus group on active surveillance and focal therapy for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2012;109(11):1636–47.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein JI, Walsh PC, Carmichael M, Brendler CB. Pathologic and clinical findings to predict tumor extent of nonpalpable (stage T1c) prostate cancer. JAMA. 1994;271(5):368–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Epstein JI. Prognostic significance of tumor volume in radical prostatectomy and needle biopsy specimens. J Urol. 2011;186(3):790–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolla M, Van Tienhoven G, Warde P, Dubois JB, Mirimanoff R-O, Storme G, et al. External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11(11):1066–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Viterbo R, Rangel LJ, Bergstralh EJ, Horwitz EM, et al. Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy versus external-beam radiotherapy for patients with high-risk prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117(13):2883–91.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Meiers I, Waters DJ, Bostwick DG. Preoperative prediction of multifocal prostate cancer and application of focal therapy: review 2007. Urology. 2007;70(6 Suppl):3–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell. 2000;100(1):57–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA. 2009;302(15):1685–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wise AM, Stamey TA, McNeal JE, Clayton JL. Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens. Urology. 2002;60(2):264–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barzell WE, Melamed MR, Cathcart P, Moore CM, Ahmed HU, Emberton M. Identifying candidates for active surveillance: an evaluation of the repeat biopsy strategy for men with favorable risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2012;188(3):762–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taira AV, Merrick GS, Bennett A, Andreini H, Taubenslag W, Galbreath RW, et al. Transperineal template-guided mapping biopsy as a staging procedure to select patients best suited for active surveillance. Am J Clin Oncol. 2013;36(2):116–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Djavan B, Ravery V, Zlotta A, Dobronski P, Dobrovits M, Fakhari M, et al. Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detected on biopsies 1, 2, 3 and 4: when should we stop? J Urol. 2001;166(5):1679–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lecornet E, Ahmed HU, Hu Y, Moore CM, Nevoux P, Barratt D, et al. The accuracy of different biopsy strategies for the detection of clinically important prostate cancer: a computer simulation. J Urol. 2012;188(3):974–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Eisenberg ML, Shinohara K. Partial salvage cryoablation of the prostate for recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy failure. Urology. 2008;72(6):1315–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ahmed HU, Cathcart P, McCartan N, Kirkham A, Allen C, Freeman A, et al. Focal salvage therapy for localized prostate cancer recurrence after external beam radiotherapy: a pilot study. Cancer. 2012;118(17):4148–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Castro Abreu AL, Bahn D, Leslie S, Shoji S, Silverman P, Desai MM, et al. Salvage focal and salvage total cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation therapy. BJU Int. 2013;112(3):298–307.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen PL, Chen M-H, D’Amico AV, Tempany CM, Steele GS, Albert M, et al. Magnetic resonance image-guided salvage brachytherapy after radiation in select men who initially presented with favorable-risk prostate cancer: a prospective phase 2 study. Cancer. 2007;110(7):1485–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shariat SF, Raptidis G, Masatoschi M, Bergamaschi F, Slawin KM. Pilot study of radiofrequency interstitial tumor ablation (RITA) for the treatment of radio-recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate. 2005;65(3):260–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean J. M. C. H. de la Rosette .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ingels, A., Van den Bos, W., de la Rosette, J.J.M.C.H. (2015). Patient Selection for Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer. In: Barret, E., Durand, M. (eds) Technical Aspects of Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0484-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0484-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0483-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0484-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics