Résumé
Si les essais thérapeutiques randomisés sont le moyen qui offre le plus de garanties scientifiques pour fonder son opinion sur un choix thérapeutique, des raisons techniques ou éthiques peuvent limiter leur réalisation [1].
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Références
Solomon MJ, McLeod RS (1995) Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery 118: 459–67
Huguier M, Chastang C, Houry S, et al. (1997) Sphincter-saving resection or not for cancer of the midrectum. Am J Surg 174: 11–5
Maciejewski ML, Livingston EH, Smith VA (2011) Survival among high-risk patients after bariatric surgery. JAMA 305(23): 2419–26
Hejblum G, Loos V, Vibert JF, et al. (2008) A web-based Delphi study on the indications of chest radiography for patients in ICUs. Chest 133: 1107–12
Hejblum G, Chalumeau-Lemoine L, Loos V, et al. (2009) Comparison of routine and on-demand prescription of chest radiography in mechanically ventilated adult: a multicentre, cluster-randomized, two-period cross-over study. Lancet 374: 1687–93
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huguier, M., Boëlle, PY. (2013). Lorsqu’un essai randomisé n’est pas possible. In: Biostatistiques pour le clinicien. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0464-4_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0464-4_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0463-7
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0464-4
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)