Advertisement

Imaging in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

  • Susanne Sloth Osther
  • Palle Jørn Sloth OstherEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

With regard to patient selection for PNL, planning of percutaneous access, intraoperative guidance and postoperative evaluation of potential complications and stone-free status, imaging plays a crucial role. In this chapter the role of current imaging modalities is discussed, and focus is made on how appropriate imaging studies may lead to safe and efficacious percutaneous renal surgery. The role of the various preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative imaging tools is discussed. Furthermore, possible future scenarios with regard to imaging in PNL are briefly touched.

Keywords

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Calcium Oxalate Monohydrate Residual Stone Nephrostomy Tube Colon Injury 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Park S, Pearle MS (2006) Imaging for percutaneous renal access and management of renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am 33:353–364PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jackman SV, Potter SR, Regan F, Jarrett TW (2000) Plain abdominal X-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after non-enhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 164:308–310PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ray AA, Chung D-G, Honey JD (2009) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in prone and prone-flexed positions: anatomic considerations. J Endourol 23:1607–1614PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Honey JD, Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculette D, Pace SP, Ray AA, Pace KT (2011) Comparison of supracostal versus infracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy using the novel prone-flexed position. J Endourol 25:947–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miller OF, Rineer SK, Reichard SR, Buckley RG, Donovan SM, Graham IR, Goff WB, Kane CJ (1998) Prospective comparison of unenhanced spiral computed tomography and intravenous urogram in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Urology 52:982–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pfister SA, Deckhart A, Laschke S, Dellas S, Otto U, Buitrago C, Roth J, Wiesner W, Bontgartz G, Gasser TC (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 13:2513–2520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shine S (2008) Urinary calculus IVU vs. CT renal stone? A critical appraised topic. Comput Biol Med 33:41–43Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patel U, Walkden RM, Ghani KR, Anson K (2009) Three-dimensional CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: accuracy of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction. Eur Radiol 19:1280–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nolte-Emsting C, Cowan N (2006) Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: many roads lead to Rome. Eur Radiol 16:2670–2686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thiruchelvam N, Mostafid H, Ubhayakar G (2005) Planning percutaneous nephrolithotomy using multidetector computed tomography urography, multiplanar reconstruction and three-dimensional reformatting. BJU Int 95:1280–1284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Cossu M, Grande S, Poggio M, Scarpa RM (2008) Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery in Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position: a new standard for percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Eur Urol 54:1393–1403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heyns CF, van Geldern WF (1990) 3-dimensional imaging of the pelvicalyceal system by computerized tomographic reconstruction. J Urol 144:1335–1338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Osther PJ, Razvi H, Liatsikos E, Averch T, Crisci A, Garcia JL, Mandal A, de la Rosette JJ (2011) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy among patients with renal anomalies: patient characteristics and outcomes; a subgroup analysis of the clinical research office of the endourological society global percutaneous nephrolithotomy study. J Endourol 25:1627–1632PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Graumann O, Osther SS, Spasojevic D, Osther PJ (2012) Can the CT planning image determine whether a kidney stone is radiopaque on a plain KUB? Urol Res 40:333–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kalb B, Sharma P, Salman K, Ogan K, Martin DR (2010) Acute abdominal pain: is there a potential role for MRI in the setting of the emergency department in a patient with renal calculi? J Magn Reson Imaging 32:1012–1023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopper KD, Sherman JL, Lurthke JM, Ghaed N (1987) The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162:443–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chalasani V, Bissoon D, Bhuvanagir AK, Mizzi A, Dunn IB (2010) Should PCNL patients have a CT in the prone position preoperatively? Can J Urol 17:5082–5086PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Azhar RA, Szymanski KM, Lemercier E, Valenti D, Andonian S, Anidjar M (2011) Visceral organ-to-percutaneous tract distance is shorter when patients are placed in the prone position on bolsters compared with the supine position. J Endourol 25:687–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tuttle DN, Yeh BM, Meng MV, Breiman RS, Stoller ML, Coakley FV (2005) Risk of injury to adjacent organs with lower-pole fluoroscopically guided percutaneous nephrostomy: evaluation with prone, supine, and multiplanar reformatted CT. J Vasc Interv Radiol 16:1489–1492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ng CS, Herts BR, Streem SB (2005) Percutaneous access to upper pole renal stones: role of prone 3-dimensional computerized tomography in inspiratory and expiratory phases. J Urol 173:124–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zarse CA, Hameed TA, Jackson ME, Pischalnikov YA, Lingemen JE, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr (2007) CT visible internal stone structure, but not Hounsfield unit value, of calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) calculi predicts lithotripsy fragility in vitro. Urol Res 35:201–206PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kim SC, Burns EK, Lingeman JE, Paterson RF, McAteer JA, Williams JC Jr (2007) Cystine calculi: correlation of CT-visible structure, CT number, and stone morphology with fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Res 35:319–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Evans HJ, Wollin TA (2001) The management of urinary calculi in pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol 11:379–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kalogeropoulou C, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN (2009) Imaging in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 23:1571–1577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ko R, Soucy F, Denstedt JD, Razvi H (2007) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy made easier: a practical guide, tips and tricks. BJU Int 101:535–539PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ibarluzea G, Scoffone CM, Cracco CM, Poggio M, Porpiglia F, Terrone C, Astobieta A, Camargo I, Gamarra M, Tempia A, Valdivia Uria JG, Scarpa RM (2007) Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 100:233–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Eisner BH, Cloyd J, Stoller ML (2009) Lower-pole fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous renal access: which calix is posterior? J Endourol 23:1621–1625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Osman M, Wendt-Nordahl G, Heger K, Michel MS, Alken P, Knoll T (2005) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography-guided renal access: experience from over 300 cases. BJU Int 96:875–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ghani KR, Patel U, Anson K (2009) Computed tomography for percutaneous access. J Endourol 23:1633–1639PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Magnusson A, Radecka E, Lönnemark M, Raland H (2005) Computed-tomography-guided punctures using a new guidance device. Acta Radiol 46:505–509PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hellawell GO, Mutch SJ, Thevendran G, Wells E, Morgan RJ (2005) Radiation exposure and the urologist: what are the risks? J Urol 174:948–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ogan K, Corwin SC, Smith T, Watumull LM, Mullican MA, Cadeddu JA, Pearle MS (2003) Sensitivity of chest fluoroscopy compared with chest CT and chest radiography for diagnosing hydropneumothorax in association with percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. Urology 62:988–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Traxer O (2009) Management of injury to the bowel during percutaneous stone removal. J Endourol 23:1777–1780PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Goswami AK, Shrivatava P, Mukherjee A, Sharma SK (2001) Management of colonic perforation during percutaneous nephrolithotomy in horseshoe kidney. J Endourol 15:989–991PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Valdivia JG, Scarpa RM, Duvdevani M, Gross AJ, Nadler RB, Nutahare K, de la Rosette JJ (2011) Supine versus prone position during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a report from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Global Study. J Endourol 25:1619–1625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Jain V, Ganpule A, Vyas J, Muthu V, Sabnis MRB, Rajapurkar MM, Desai MR (2009) Management of non-neoplastic renal hemorrhage by transarterial embolization. Urology 74:522–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lu M-H, Pu X-Y, Gao X, Zhou X-F, Qiu J-G, Si-Tu J (2010) A comparative study of clinical value of single B-mode ultrasound guidance and B-mode combined with color doppler ultrasound guidance in mini-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy to decrease hemorrhagic complications. Urology 76:815–820PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Portis AJ, Laliberte MA, Drake S, Holtz C, Rosenberg MS, Bretzke CA (2006) Intraoperative fragment detection during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: evaluation of high magnification rotational fluoroscopy combined with aggressive nephroscopy. J Urol 175:162–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gettman MT, Pearle MS (2000) Evaluation of residual stones following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Braz J Urol 26:579–583Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Preminger GM (1999) Editorial comment. J Urol 162:314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Denstedt JD, Clayman RV, Picus DD (1991) Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 145:703–705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA (1999) Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 162:23–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Park J, Hong B, Park T, Park HK (2007) Effectiveness of noncontrast computed tomography in evaluation of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 21:684–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Osman Y, El-Tabey N, Rafai H, Elnahas A, Shoma A, Eraky I, Kenwy M, El-Kapany H (2008) Detection of residual stones after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: role of nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 179:198–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Narepalem N, Sundaram C, Boridy IC, Yan Y, Heiken JP, Clayman RV (2002) Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. J Urol 167:1235–1238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tisdale BE, Siemens DR, Lysack J, Nolan RL, Wilson JW (2007) Correlation of CT scan versus plain radiography for measuring urinary stone dimensions. Can J Urol 14:3489–3492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fowler KAB, Locken JA, Duchesne JH, Williamson MR (2002) US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology 222:109–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ulusan S, Koc Z, Tokmak N (2007) Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: comparison with CT. J Clin Ultrasound 35:256–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA, Scales CD, Rampersaud E, Pearle MS, Preminger GM (2009) Radiation exposure in the acute and short term management of urolithiasisat 2 academic centers. J Urol 181:668–673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hyams ES, Shah O (2010) Evaluation and follow-up of patients with urinary lithiasis: minimizing radiation exposure. Curr Urol Rep 11:80–86PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Boctor EM, Choti MA, Burdette EC, Webster RJ (2008) Three-dimensional ultrasound-guided robotic needle placement: an experimental evaluation. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 4:180–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mozer P, Conort P, Leroy A, Baumann M, Payan Y, Troccaz J, Chartier-Kastler E, Richard F (2007) Aid to percutaneous renal access by virtual projection of the ultrasound puncture tract onto fluoroscopic images. J Endourol 21:460–465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    de la Rosette JJMCH, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ, Conort P (2008) Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy – a critical review. Eur Urol 54:994–1003PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gupta R, Cheung AC, Bartling SH, Lisauskas J, Grasruck M, Leidecker C, Schmidt B, Flohr T, Brady TJ (2008) Flat-panel volume CT: fundamental principles, technology, and applications. Radiographics 28:2009–2022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Su L-M, Stoianovici D, Jarrett TW, Patriciu A, Roberts WW, Caddeddu JA, Ramakumar SY, Solomon SB, Kavoussi LR (2002) Robotic percutaneous access to the kidney: comparison with standard manual access. J Endourol 16:471–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Challacombe B, Patriciu A, Glass J, Aron M, Jarrett T, Kim F, Pinto P, Stoianovici D, Smeeton N, Tiptaft R, Kavoussi L, Dasgupta P (2005) A randomized controlled trial versus robotic and telerobotic access to the kidney as the first step in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Comput Aided Surg 10:165–171PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hernandez DJ, Sinkov VA, Roberts WW, Allaf ME, Patriciu A, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR, Stoianovici D (2001) Measurement of bio-impedance with a smart needle to confirm percutaneous kidney access. J Urol 166:1520–1523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susanne Sloth Osther
    • 1
  • Palle Jørn Sloth Osther
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Urology, Fredericia Hospital – A part of Hospital LittlebeltUniversity of Southern DenmarkFredericiaDenmark

Personalised recommendations