Advertisement

Intraoperative Complications: How to Avoid Them?

  • Francisco Pedro Juan DaelsEmail author
  • Mariano Sebastian Gonzalez
Chapter

Abstract

At present, PNL is the minimally invasive technique of choice to treat complex renal stones. Despite being a safe surgical intervention, PNL is not exempt from potential complications, which can arise at any stage of the procedure: patient positioning, renal puncture, tract dilation, intraoperative manipulation, stone fragmentation and postoperative management. Besides being the majority of them minor, they can be kept to a minimum in experienced hands with the development of new techniques and improved technologies. However, patient positioning-related complications are not considered in any classification, as well as those related to anaesthesiological problems, which are the ones minimised adopting ECIRS in the Galdakao-modified supine Valdivia position. In particular, with regard to the potential complications due to decubitus, haemodynamic conditions, management of the respiratory tract and the relative location of the colon with respect to the puncture site, PNL performed in supine decubitus or in any of its variations proves to be safer than in prone decubitus.

Keywords

Access Tract Safe Area Splenic Lesion Stone Fragmentation Amplatz Sheath 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Langmayr J, Ortler M, Obwegeser A, Felber S (1996) Quadriplegia after lumbar disc surgery. A case report. Spine 21:1932–1935CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderton J, Schady W, Markham D (1994) An unusual cause of postoperative brachial plexus palsy. J Anaesth 72:605–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwartz D, Drummond D, Hahn M et al (2000) Prevention of positional brachial plexopathy during surgical correction of scoliosis. Spinal Disord 13:178–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Winfree C, Kline D (2005) Intraoperative positioning nerve injuries. Surg Neurol 63:5–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Valdivia Uria J, Valle J, Villarroya S et al (1990) Why is percutaneous nephrostomy still performed with patient prone? J Endourol 4:269–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Sio M, Autorino R, Quarto G et al (2008) Modified supine versus prone position in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones treatable with a single percutaneous access. a prospective randomized trial. Eur Urol 54:196–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ibarluzea G, Scoffone C, Cracco C et al (2007) Supine Valdivia and modified lithotomy position for simultaneous anterograde and retrograde endourological access. BJU Int 100: 233–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Daels F, Gonzalez M, Garcia Freire F et al (2009) Percutaneous lithotripsy in Valdivia-Galdakao decubitus position: our experience. J Endourol 23:1615–1620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Valdivia Uría JG, Valle Gerhol J, López López JA (1999) Percutaneous nephroscopy technique in supine position. Braz J Urol 25:263–267Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anderton J (1991) The prone position for the surgical patient: a historical review of the principles and hazards. Br J Anaesth 67:452–463CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jain Y, Bithal P, Rath J (2007) Pressure score on malar prominences by horseshoe headrest in prone position. Anaesth Int Care 35:304–305Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moore D, Edmunds L (1950) Prone position frame. Surgery 27:276–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ray C (1987) New kneeling attachment and cushioned face rest for spinal surgery. Neurosurgery 20:266–269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jericho B, Scaria G (2003) Contact dermatitis after use of the prone positioned. Br Anesth Analg 19:1–4Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kai Y, Yamaoka A, Irita K, Zaitsu A, Takahashi S (1995) Transient tracheal obstruction during surgical correction of scoliosis in a patient with Marfan’s syndrome. Masui 44:868–873PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Szabo M, Denman W, Marota J, Roberts J (1997) Evaluation of airway edema in patients operated on in the prone position. J Neurosurg Anaesthesiol 9:380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng M, Todorov A, Templehoff R et al (2001) The effect of prone positioning on intraocular pressure in anesthetized patients. Anaesthesiology 95:1351–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee L (2003) Postoperative visual loss registry: preliminary analysis of factors associated with spine operations. ASA Newsl 67:7–8Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roth S, Tung A, Ksiazek S (2007) Visual loss in a prone-positioned spine surgery patient with the head on a foam headrest and goggles covering the eyes: an old complication with a new mechanism. Anesth Analg 104:1185–1187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee L, Posner K (2006) The American Society of Anaesthesiologists Postoperative visual loss registry: analysis of 93 spine surgery cases with postoperative visual loss. Anaesthesiology 105:652–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stevens W, Glazer P, Kelley S et al (1997) Ophthalmic complications after spinal surgery. Spine 22:1319–1322CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palmon S, Kirsch J, Deppe J, Toung T (1998) The effect of the prone position on pulmonary mechanics is frame dependent. Anesth Analg 87:1175–1180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lee T, Yamg L, Chen H (1998) Effect of patient position and hypotensive anesthesia on inferior vena cava pressure. Spine 23:941–948CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tobias D, Mencio G, Atwood R, Gurwitz G (1994) Intraoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the prone position. J Pediatr Surg 29:1537–1538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gonzalez MS, Billordo Peres N, Garcia Marchibena P et al (2009) Colon position in ventral and intermediate dorsal decubitus (Valdivia). J Endourol 23(Suppl 1):A49, World Congress of Endourology 2009, abstract MP4-19Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hopper K, Sherman J, Luethke J, Ghaed N (1987) The retrorenal colon in the supine and prone patient. Radiology 162:443–446PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    LeRoy A, Williams H Jr, Bender C (1985) Colonic perforation following percutaneous nephrostomy and renal calculus removal. Radiology 155:83–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gupta R, Kumar A, Kapoor R et al (2002) Prospective evaluation of safety and efficacy of the supracostal approach for percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU Int 90:809–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Munver R, Delvecchio FC, Newman GE, Preminger GM (2001) Critical analysis of supracostal access for percutaneous renal surgery. J Urol 166:1242–1246CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robert M, Maubon A, Roux JO et al (1999) Direct percutaneous approach to the upper pole of the kidney: MRI anatomy with assessment of the visceral risk. J Endourol 13:17–20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Desai A, Jain S, Benway B et al (2010) Spleen injury during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a case report with a novel management technique. J Endourol 24:541–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Valer Algarabel J, Valdivia Uria J, Orozco J et al (1992) Anatomia renal aplicada a la cirugia percutánea, Cuadernos de Endourologia. Hospital Clinico Universitario, ZaragozaGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sampaio F (1992) Anatomic background for intrarenal endourologic surgery. J Endourol 6:301–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sampaio F, Zanier J, Aragao A (1992) Intrarenal access: three dimensional anatomical study. J Urol 148:1769–1773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sampaio F, Aragao A (1990) Anatomical relationship between the intrarenal arteries and the kidney collecting system. J Urol 143:679–681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Koroglu A, Toga T, Cicek M et al (2003) The effects of irrigation fluid volume and irrigation time on fluid electrolyte balance and hemodynamics in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol 35:1–6CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rozentsveig V, Neulander E, Roussabrov E et al (2007) Anesthetic considerations during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Anesth 19:351–355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gehring H, Nahm W, Zimmermann K et al (1999) Irrigation fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 43:316–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Roberts S, Bolton D, Stoller M (1994) Hypothermia associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 44:832–835CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tefekli A, Altunrende F, Tepeler K et al (2007) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients: a prospective randomized comparison. Int Urol Nephrol 39:57–63CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Shah H, Khandar A, Sodha H et al (2009) Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: 3 years of experience with 454 patients. BJU Int 104:840–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    De La Rosette JJ, Zuazu JR, Tsakiris P et al (2008) Prognostic factors and per cutaneous nephrolithotomy morbidity: a multivariate analysis of a contemporary series using the Clavien classification. J Urol 180:2489–2493CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tefekli A, Ali Karadag M, Tepeler K et al (2008) Classification of percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications using the modified Clavien grading system: looking for a standard. Eur Urol 53:184–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zuazu JR, Hruza M, Rassweiler JJ, De Rosette JJ (2010) The Clavien classification system to optimize documentation of PCNL morbidity. Arch Ital Urol Androl 82:20–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    De La Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, CROES PCNL Study Group (2011) The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications and outcomes in 5,803 patients. J Endourol 25:11–17CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Yakupoglu YK et al (2011) Modified Clavien classification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of complications in children. J Urol 185:264–268CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Labate G, Modi P, Timoney A et al (2011) The percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: classification of complications. J Endourol 25:1275–1280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Seitz C, Desai M, Haecker A et al (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61:146–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Pedro Juan Daels
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mariano Sebastian Gonzalez
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of UrologyInstituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos AiresBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations