Advertisement

PNL in Paediatric Patients

  • Antonio FrattiniEmail author
  • Cesare Marco Scoffone
  • Stefania Ferretti
Chapter

Abstract

Incidence and indications of urolithiasis treatment in children are revised in this chapter. In particular, the authors afford the issue of paediatric PNL, with particular reference to the operative armamentarium needed, patient positioning and advantages of the supine position in children, renal anatomical features and technical aspects of ECIRS (Endoscopic Combined IntraRenal Surgery) in young age (with details regarding renal access and tract dilation). Paediatric ECIRS is as safe and effective as in adults, especially in case of concomitant congenital urinary malformations.

Keywords

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Bladder Stone Ureteral Access Sheath Renal Access Paediatric Urolithiasis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Sarica K, Horuz R (2013) In: Knoll T, Pearle MS (eds) Clinical management of urolithiasis. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp 133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Straub M, Gschwend J, Zorn C (2010) Pediatric urolithiasis: the current surgical management. Pediatr Nephrol 25:1239–1244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sternberg K, Greenfield SP, Williot P, Wan J (2005) Pediatric stone disease: an evolving experience. J Urol 174:1711–1714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rhee K, Palmer JS (2006) Ungated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: an initial series. Urology 67:392–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dawaba MS, Shokeir AA, Hafez A, Shoma AM et al (2004) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children: early and late anatomical and functional results. J Urol 172:1078–1081PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ozden E, Mercimek MN, Yakapoglu YK, Ozkaya O, Sarikaya S (2011) Modified Clavien classification in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: assessment of complications in children. J Urol 185:264–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guven S, Frattini A, Onal B, Desai M et al (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children in different age groups: data from the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study. BJU Int 111:148–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zargooshi J (2011) Open stone surgery in children: is it justified in the era of minimally invasive therapies? BJU Int 88:928–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bayrak O, Seckiner I, Erthrhan S, Duzgun I, Yagci F (2012) Comparative analyses of percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus open surgery in pediatric urinary stone disease. Pediatr Surg Int 28:1025–1029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Frattini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Cesare Marco Scoffone
    • 2
  • Stefania Ferretti
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of UrologyGuastalla HospitalGuastalla, (Reggio Emilia)Italy
  2. 2.Department of UrologyCottolengo HospitalTorinoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Surgery, Urology UnitUniversity Hospital of ParmaParmaItaly

Personalised recommendations