Advertisement

Instruments and Accessories for ECIRS

  • Cesare Marco ScoffoneEmail author
  • András Hoznek
  • Julie Rode
Chapter

Abstract

Since ECIRS offers the possibility of a simultaneous antegrade and retrograde access to the upper urinary tract performed by two distinct urologists, the optimal working environment should comprise a valid video network with adequate settings, a complete imaging equipment, an irrigation system, and a variety of instruments and accessories, which should be well known in terms of features and technological details. In this chapter the authors describe a complete landscape of all the alternatives on the market, with regard to ureteroscopes and nephroscopes, disposable accessories like access needles, guidewires and dilation systems, intracorporeal lithotripsy, and fragments retrieval devices.

Keywords

Outer Probe Holmium Laser Camera Head Ureteral Access Sheath Percutaneous Tract 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Hoznek A, Ouzaid I, Gettman M et al (2011) Fluoroscopy-guided renal access in supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 78:221–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fernstrom I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alken P (1981) Telescopbougierset zur perkutanen Nephrostomie. Aktuel Urol 12:216–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rusnak B, Castaneda-Zuniga W, Kotula F, Herrera M, Amplatz K (1982) An improved dilator system for percutaneous nephrostomies. Radiology 144:174PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mulvaney WP (1953) Attempted disintegration of calculi by ultrasonic vibrations. J Urol 70:704–707PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gasteyer KH (1971) Eine neue Methode der Blasensteinzertrummerung: Die Ultraschall-Lithotripsie. Urologe 10:30–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hemal AK, Goel A, Aron M et al (2003) Evaluation of fragmentation with single or multiple pulse setting of Lithoclast for renal calculi during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and its impact on clearance. Urol Int 70:265–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teichman JM, Vassar GJ, Bishoff JT, Bellman GC (1998) Holmium:YAG lithotripsy yields smaller fragments than lithoclast, pulsed dye laser or electrohydraulic lithotripsy. J Urol 159:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoffman N, Lukasewycz SJ, Canales B et al (2004) Percutaneous renal stone extraction: in vitro study of retrieval devices. J Urol 172:559–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cesare Marco Scoffone
    • 1
    Email author
  • András Hoznek
    • 2
  • Julie Rode
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of UrologyCottolengo HospitalTorinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of UrologyCHU Henri MondorCréteil CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations