Skip to main content

Vers la définition automatique des éléments de données des fiches RCP en cancérologie à partir d’une ontologie

  • Chapter
Systèmes d’information pour l’amélioration de la qualité en santé

Part of the book series: Informatique et Santé ((INFORMATIQUE,volume 1))

  • 569 Accesses

Abstract

Semantic interoperability based on ontologies allows systems to combine their information and process them automatically. The ability to extract meaningful fragments from ontology is a key for the ontology re-use and the construction of a subset will help to structure clinical data entries. The aim of this work is to provide a method for extracting a set of concepts for a specific domain, in order to help to define data elements of an EHR. Method: an extraction algorithm was developed to extract, from the National Cancer Institute’s Thesaurus (NCIT) and for a specific disease (i.e. prostate neoplasm), all the concepts of interest into a sub-ontology. The extraction takes as input, one or several key concepts. We compared all the concepts extracted to the concepts encoded manually and contained into the multi-disciplinary meeting report form (MDMRF). Results: NCIT contained 83143 concepts from which we extracted two sub-ontologies: sub-ontology 1 contained 434 concepts (by using a single key concept) and sub-ontology 2 contained 480 concepts (by using 5 additional keywords). The coverage of sub-ontology 2 to the MDMRF concepts was 51%. The low rate of coverage is due to the lack of definition or misclassification of the NCIT concepts. By providing a subset of concepts focused on a particular domain, this extraction method helps to optimize the binding process of data elements and at maintaining and enriching a domain ontology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. HL7 Templates. Disponible sur: 〈http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/template/index.cfm〉 (Consulté le 01.12.2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kalra D, Beale T, Heard S. The openEHR Foundation. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 2005; 115: 153–173

    Google Scholar 

  3. Data element — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Disponible sur: 〈http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_element〉 (Consulté le 01.12.2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rosenbloom ST, Miller RA, Johnson KB, Elkin PL, Brown SH. Interface Terminologies: Facilitating Direct Entry of Clinical Data into Electronic Health Record Systems. J American Medical Informatics Association 2006; 13: 277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Daniel C, Buemi A, Mazuel L, Ouagne D, Charlet J. Functional Requirements of Terminology Services for Coupling Interface Terminologies to Reference Terminologies. MIE 2009; 205–209

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pathak J, Jiang G, Dwarkanath SO, Buntrock JD, Chute CG, Chute C. LexValueSets: an approach for context-driven value sets extraction. AMIA Annu Symposium Proc 2008; 556–560

    Google Scholar 

  7. Noy N, Musen M. The PROMPT suite: Interactive tools for ontology mapping and merging. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2003; 6(59): 983–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seidenberg J, Rector A. Web ontology segmentation: analysis, classification and use. Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web. ACM 2006; 13–22

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stuckenschmidt H, Klein M. Structure-based partitioning of large class hierarchies. Proc. ISWC 2004; 289–303

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rector A, Napoli A, Stamou G, Stoilos G, Wolger H, Pan J, D’Aquin M, Spaccapietra S, Tzouvaras V. Report on modularization of ontologies. Technical report, Knowledge Web Deliverable D2.1.3.1, (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ocean terminology toolset: Oceaninformatics product description, July 2007. Page 16–18. Format PDF. Disponible sur: 〈http://www.oceaninformatics.com/media/docs/ProductDescription-e95c85c6-4197-4700-8c5c-5de85561f009.pdf〉 (Consulté le 01.12.2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fung KW, McDonald C, Srinivasan S. The UMLS-CORE project: a study of the problem list terminologies used in large healthcare institutions. J American Medical Informatics Association 2010; 17: 675–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Classification TNM — Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Disponible sur: 〈http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classification_TNM〉 (Consulté le 01.12.2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL, McCray AT. The Unified Medical Language System. Methods Inf Med 1993; 32: 281–91

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annabel Bourdé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bourdé, A. et al. (2011). Vers la définition automatique des éléments de données des fiches RCP en cancérologie à partir d’une ontologie. In: Staccini, P.M., Harmel, A., Darmoni, S.J., Gouider, R. (eds) Systèmes d’information pour l’amélioration de la qualité en santé. Informatique et Santé, vol 1. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0285-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0285-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0284-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0285-5

Publish with us

Policies and ethics