Skip to main content

Environmental Impacts of Building Technologies: A Comparative Study in Kutch District, Gujarat State, India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Technologies and Innovations for Development

Abstract

This chapter is based on the findings of a research project co-financed by the Rector’s Conference of the Swiss Universities of Applied Sciences (KFH) and carried out in 2008–2009 in collaboration between the World Habitat Research Centre, University of Applied Sciences of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Lugano, the Center for Environmental Planning and Technology University (CEPT), Faculty of Architecture in Ahmadabad, India, and Hunnarshala Foundation for Building Technology and Innovations in Bhuj, Gujarat, India. The project aims at filling a gap in the assessment of environmental impacts of building technologies in India. Previous research on global sustainability of post-disaster reconstruction have indeed clearly identified the lack of scientific data on such impacts in this country (Ding 2008; Duyne Barenstein and Pittet 2007; Gumaste 2006; Jönsson 2000). The lack of data hinders agencies and professionals from making informed choices of materials and technologies aiming at reducing environmental impacts of construction. Based on these considerations, the project’s specific objectives were (a) to design and test a methodology for assessing the environmental impacts of building materials in a specific context, (b) to provide data on environmental impacts of building technologies in Kutch District, (c) to provide and disseminate knowledge for increasing the sustainability of housing projects, and (d) to exchange and transfer knowledge and research capacity on environmental impacts of building materials assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asif, M., et al. (2007). Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Building and Environment, 42(3), 1391–1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boerjesson, P., & Gustavsson, L. (2000). Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: Wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy, 28(9), 575–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, A., & Honey, B. (1994). Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction. Energy and Buildings, 20(3), 205–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chani, P. S., et al. (2003). Comparative analysis of embodied energy rates for walling elements in India. Architectural Engineering, 84, 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Citherlet, S., & Defaux, T. (2007). Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span. Building and Environment, 42(2), 591–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, R. J. (1999). Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems. Building and Environment, 34(3), 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath, A., et al. (1995). Comparative assessment of energy requirements for different types of residential buildings in India. Energy and Building, 23(2), 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimoudi, A., & Tompa, C. (2008). Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(1–2), 86–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, G. K. (2008). Sustainable construction – The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duyne Barenstein, J., & Pittet, D. (2007). Post-disaster housing reconstruction: Current trends and sustainable alternatives for tsunami-affected communities in coastal Tamil Nadu. EPFL/Ingénieurs du Monde Point Sud, 26, 5–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent. (2008). The Ecoinvent database. Retrieved from www.ecoinvent.org. Accessed October 2, 2008.

  • Emmanuel, R. (2004). Estimating the environmental suitability of wall materials: Preliminary results from Sri Lanka. Building and Environment, 39(10), 1253–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González, M. J., & Navarro, J. (2006). Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Building and Environment, 41(7), 902–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumaste, K. (2006, December 4–5). Embodied energy computations in buildings. Advances in energy research. National Conference on Advances in Energy Research, Bombay, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustavsson, L., & Sathre, R. (2006). Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete materials. Building and Environment, 41(7), 940–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. D. (1999). A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials. Building and Environment, 34(6), 751–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, N., & Pearlmutter, D. (2008). A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert. Energy and Buildings, 40(5), 837–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, M. A. J., et al. (2006). Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environmental Science & Technology, 40(3), 641–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts, M. A. J., et al. (2008). Ecological footprinting accounting in the life cycle assessment of products. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 798–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (n.d.). Task force on national greenhouse gas inventories. Tratto il giorno 2008 da IPCC. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/find_ef_main.php. Accessed September 10, 2008.

  • International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. (2006). ISO 14044 environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. (2008). ISO 14040 environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles framework. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagadish, K. S. (1979). Energy and Rural Buildings in India. Energy and Buildings, 2 (1979) 287–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönsson, A. (2000). Tools and methods for environmental assessment of building products – Methodological analysis of six selected approaches. Building and Environment, 35(3), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel, J. C., et al. (2001). Building houses with local materials: Means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Building and Environment, 36(10), 1119–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlmutter, D., et al. (2007). Alternative materials for desert buildings: A comparative life cycle energy analysis. Building Research & Information, 32(2), 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. (1988). Fuels and combustion. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, A., et al. (2008). Embodied energy analysis of adobe house. Renewable Energy, 34(3), 755–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N., et al. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, N., et al. (2006). Environmental relevance and use of energy indicators in environmental management and research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(2), 134–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Energy and Resource Institute [TERI]. (n.d.). TEDDY: Teri energy data directory and handbook. New Delhi/Bangalore: The Energy Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatarama, B. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2003). Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy and Buildings, 35(2), 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vertical Shaft Brick Kiln Project [VSBK]. (2008). Database of embodied energy in building raw materials. Kathmandu, Nepal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasantha Abeysundra, U. G., et al. (2007). Environmental, economic and social analysis of materials for doors and windows in Sri Lanka. Building and Environment, 42(5), 2141–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Pittet .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pittet, D. et al. (2012). Environmental Impacts of Building Technologies: A Comparative Study in Kutch District, Gujarat State, India. In: Bolay, JC., Schmid, M., Tejada, G., Hazboun, E. (eds) Technologies and Innovations for Development. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0268-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics