Abstract
This chapter is based on the findings of a research project co-financed by the Rector’s Conference of the Swiss Universities of Applied Sciences (KFH) and carried out in 2008–2009 in collaboration between the World Habitat Research Centre, University of Applied Sciences of Southern Switzerland (SUPSI), Lugano, the Center for Environmental Planning and Technology University (CEPT), Faculty of Architecture in Ahmadabad, India, and Hunnarshala Foundation for Building Technology and Innovations in Bhuj, Gujarat, India. The project aims at filling a gap in the assessment of environmental impacts of building technologies in India. Previous research on global sustainability of post-disaster reconstruction have indeed clearly identified the lack of scientific data on such impacts in this country (Ding 2008; Duyne Barenstein and Pittet 2007; Gumaste 2006; Jönsson 2000). The lack of data hinders agencies and professionals from making informed choices of materials and technologies aiming at reducing environmental impacts of construction. Based on these considerations, the project’s specific objectives were (a) to design and test a methodology for assessing the environmental impacts of building materials in a specific context, (b) to provide data on environmental impacts of building technologies in Kutch District, (c) to provide and disseminate knowledge for increasing the sustainability of housing projects, and (d) to exchange and transfer knowledge and research capacity on environmental impacts of building materials assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asif, M., et al. (2007). Life cycle assessment: A case study of a dwelling home in Scotland. Building and Environment, 42(3), 1391–1394.
Boerjesson, P., & Gustavsson, L. (2000). Greenhouse gas balances in building construction: Wood versus concrete from life-cycle and forest land-use perspectives. Energy Policy, 28(9), 575–588.
Buchanan, A., & Honey, B. (1994). Energy and carbon dioxide implications of building construction. Energy and Buildings, 20(3), 205–217.
Chani, P. S., et al. (2003). Comparative analysis of embodied energy rates for walling elements in India. Architectural Engineering, 84, 47–50.
Citherlet, S., & Defaux, T. (2007). Energy and environmental comparison of three variants of a family house during its whole life span. Building and Environment, 42(2), 591–598.
Cole, R. J. (1999). Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems. Building and Environment, 34(3), 335–348.
Debnath, A., et al. (1995). Comparative assessment of energy requirements for different types of residential buildings in India. Energy and Building, 23(2), 141–146.
Dimoudi, A., & Tompa, C. (2008). Energy and environmental indicators related to construction of office buildings. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53(1–2), 86–95.
Ding, G. K. (2008). Sustainable construction – The role of environmental assessment tools. Journal of Environmental Management, 86(3), 451–464.
Duyne Barenstein, J., & Pittet, D. (2007). Post-disaster housing reconstruction: Current trends and sustainable alternatives for tsunami-affected communities in coastal Tamil Nadu. EPFL/Ingénieurs du Monde Point Sud, 26, 5–8.
Ecoinvent. (2008). The Ecoinvent database. Retrieved from www.ecoinvent.org. Accessed October 2, 2008.
Emmanuel, R. (2004). Estimating the environmental suitability of wall materials: Preliminary results from Sri Lanka. Building and Environment, 39(10), 1253–1261.
González, M. J., & Navarro, J. (2006). Assessment of the decrease of CO2 emissions in the construction field through the selection of materials: Practical case study of three houses of low environmental impact. Building and Environment, 41(7), 902–909.
Gumaste, K. (2006, December 4–5). Embodied energy computations in buildings. Advances in energy research. National Conference on Advances in Energy Research, Bombay, India.
Gustavsson, L., & Sathre, R. (2006). Variability in energy and carbon dioxide balances of wood and concrete materials. Building and Environment, 41(7), 940–951.
Harris, J. D. (1999). A quantitative approach to the assessment of the environmental impact of building materials. Building and Environment, 34(6), 751–758.
Huberman, N., & Pearlmutter, D. (2008). A life-cycle energy analysis of building materials in the Negev desert. Energy and Buildings, 40(5), 837–848.
Huijbregts, M. A. J., et al. (2006). Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environmental Science & Technology, 40(3), 641–648.
Huijbregts, M. A. J., et al. (2008). Ecological footprinting accounting in the life cycle assessment of products. Ecological Economics, 64(4), 798–807.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (n.d.). Task force on national greenhouse gas inventories. Tratto il giorno 2008 da IPCC. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/EFDB/find_ef_main.php. Accessed September 10, 2008.
International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. (2006). ISO 14044 environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.
International Organization for Standardization [ISO]. (2008). ISO 14040 environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles framework. Geneva: ISO.
Jagadish, K. S. (1979). Energy and Rural Buildings in India. Energy and Buildings, 2 (1979) 287–296.
Jönsson, A. (2000). Tools and methods for environmental assessment of building products – Methodological analysis of six selected approaches. Building and Environment, 35(3), 223–238.
Morel, J. C., et al. (2001). Building houses with local materials: Means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Building and Environment, 36(10), 1119–1126.
Pearlmutter, D., et al. (2007). Alternative materials for desert buildings: A comparative life cycle energy analysis. Building Research & Information, 32(2), 144–155.
Sarkar, S. (1988). Fuels and combustion. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
Shukla, A., et al. (2008). Embodied energy analysis of adobe house. Renewable Energy, 34(3), 755–761.
Stern, N., et al. (2006). Stern review: The economics of climate change. London: HM Treasury.
Svensson, N., et al. (2006). Environmental relevance and use of energy indicators in environmental management and research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(2), 134–145.
The Energy and Resource Institute [TERI]. (n.d.). TEDDY: Teri energy data directory and handbook. New Delhi/Bangalore: The Energy Research Institute.
Venkatarama, B. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2003). Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy and Buildings, 35(2), 129–137.
Vertical Shaft Brick Kiln Project [VSBK]. (2008). Database of embodied energy in building raw materials. Kathmandu, Nepal.
Yasantha Abeysundra, U. G., et al. (2007). Environmental, economic and social analysis of materials for doors and windows in Sri Lanka. Building and Environment, 42(5), 2141–2149.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Paris
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pittet, D. et al. (2012). Environmental Impacts of Building Technologies: A Comparative Study in Kutch District, Gujarat State, India. In: Bolay, JC., Schmid, M., Tejada, G., Hazboun, E. (eds) Technologies and Innovations for Development. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0268-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0268-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0267-1
Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0268-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)