Skip to main content

Les vraies indications de la nutrition parentérale

  • Chapter
Post’U FMC-HGE

Résumé

La dénutrition se définit par des apports ou des stocks énergétiques ou protéiniques insuffisants pour répondre aux besoins métaboliques de l’organisme. Un apport alimentaire inapproprié ou insuffisant fait partie des nombreux mécanismes qui conduisent à la dénutrition, de même que l’augmentation des besoins métaboliques liée à une maladie ou l’augmentation des pertes énergétiques par un tube digestif malade. Les conséquences de la dénutrition sont nombreuses: diminution des capacités fonctionnelles, de la qualité de vie des malades, mais aussi augmentation de la morbidité, retard de cicatrisation, augmentation des infections secondaires et surtout de la mortalité. La voie orale doit toujours être privilégiée lorsque celle-ci est insuffisante ou impossible, une nutrition artificielle (nutrition entérale ou nutrition parentérale) doit être envisagée.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Bozzetti F and Forbes A. The ESPEN clinical practice Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: present status and perspectives for future research. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28(4):359–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hadfield RJ, et al. Effects of enteral and parenteral nutrition on gut mucosal permeability in the critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 1995. 152(5 Pt 1):1545–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Windsor AC, et al. Compared with parenteral nutrition, enteral feeding attenuates the acute phase response and improves disease severity in acute pancreatitis. Gut, 1998. 42(3):p. 431–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Stroud M, Duncan H and Nightingale J. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut, 2003. 52Suppl 7:vii1–vii12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cano N, et al. Traité de nutrition artificielle de l’adulte. Springer-Verlag, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Howard L and Ashley C. Management of complications in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology, 2003. 124(6):p.1651–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Messing B and Joly F. Guidelines for management of home parenteral support in adult chronic intestinal failure patients. Gastroenterology, 2006. 130(2 Suppl 1):S43–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mermel LA, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis, 2009. 49(1):1–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cavicchi M, et al. Prevalence of liver disease and contributing factors in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition for permanent intestinal failure. Ann Intern Med, 2000. 132(7): 525–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Gossum A, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: gastroenterology. Clin Nutr, 2009. 28(4):415–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lochs H, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Gastroenterology. Clin Nutr, 2006. 25(2):260–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffiths AM, et al. Meta-analysis of enteral nutrition as a primary treatment of active Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology, 1995. 108(4):1056–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zachos M, Tondeur M and Griffiths AM. Enteral nutritional therapy for inducing remission of Crohn’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2001(3): CD000542.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Messing B, et al. Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with the short bowel syndrome. Gastroenterology, 1999. 117(5):043–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meier R, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Pancreas. Clin Nutr, 2006. 25(2):275–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Marik PE and Zaloga GP. Metaanalysis of parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis. BMJ, 2004. 328(7453): 1407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ziegler TR. Parenteral nutrition in the critically ill patient. N Engl J Med, 2009. 361(11):1088–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Singer P, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: intensive care. Clin Nutr, 2009. 28(4):387–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. August DA and Huhmann MB. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2009. 33(5): 472–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology. Clin Nutr, 2009. 28(4): 445–54.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisca Joly .

Editor information

Philippe Lévy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Layec, S. et al. (2011). Les vraies indications de la nutrition parentérale. In: Lévy, P. (eds) Post’U FMC-HGE. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0237-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0237-4_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0236-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0237-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics