Skip to main content

Scintigraphie et ischémie myocardique en 2011

  • Conference paper
Imagerie en coupes du cœur et des vaisseaux

Résumé

La scintigraphie myocardique de stress constitue depuis près de trente ans un examen clé pour la recherche de l’ischémie. Elle cible les processus cellulaires et les événements physiopathologiques initiaux de la cascade ischémique (fig. 1). Plus de 11 millions de scintigraphies myocardiques de stress sont pratiquées par an aux États-Unis. Depuis l’avènement du 201thallium dans les années 1970, elle a connu des progrès continuels. La tomoscintigraphie SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) a remplacé les images planaires dans les années 1980, les traceurs technétiés ont amélioré la qualité d’image et ont conduit à des protocoles plus souples à partir des années 1990 ; plus récemment, la synchronisation à l’ECG (Gated-SPECT) a permis l’évaluation concomitante de la fonction ventriculaire. Ce chapitre dresse l’état de l’art de la scintigraphie myocardique conventionnelle tout en pointant ses limites, et annonce les progrès attendus avec l’imagerie hybride, les caméras à semi-conducteurs et le PET/CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Thompson RC, SJ Cullom (2006) Issues regarding radiation dosage of cardiac and radiography procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 13: 19–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giorgetti A, Kusch A, Casagranda M et al. (2010) Myocardial imaging with 99mTctetrofosmine: Influence of post-stress acquisition time, regional radiotracer uptake, and wall motion abnormalities on the clinical results. J Nucl Cardiol 17: 276–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Henzlova MJ, Cerqueira MD, Hansen CL et al. (2009) Stress protocols and tracers. www.asnc.org/imageuploads/ImagingGuidelinesStressProtocols021109.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hendel RC, Berman DS, Di Carli MF et al. (2009) Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 53: 2201–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliver Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I et al. (2007) Cardiac image fusion from standalone SPECT and CT: Clinical experience. J Nucl Med 48: 696–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Underwood SR, Anagnostopoulos C, Cerqueira M et al. (2004) Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: the evidence. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31: 261–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kapur A, Latus KA, Davies G et al. (2002) A comparison of three radionuclide myocardial perfusion tracers in clinical practice: the ROBUST study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29: 1608–1616

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Emmett L, Iwanochko RM, Freeman MR et al. (2002) Reversible regional wall motion abnormalities on exercise 99mTc-Gated-SPECT predict high-grade angiographic stenoses. J Am Coll Cardiol 39: 991–998

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Taillefer R, DePuey GE, Udelson JE et al. (1997) Comparative diagnostic accuracy of 201Tl and 99mTc sestamibi SPECT imaging (Perfusion and G-SPECT) in detecting coronary artery disease in women. J Am Coll Cardiol 29: 69–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shaw LJ, AE Iskandrian (2004) Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 11: 171–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw LJ, Hendel RC, Heller GV et al. (2008) Prognostic estimation of coronary artery disease risk with resting perfusion abnormalities and stress ischemia on myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 15: 762–773

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Alqaisi F, Albadarin F, Jaffery Z et al. (2008) Prognostic predictors and outcomes in patients with abnormal myocardial perfusion imaging and angiographically insignificant coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 15: 754–761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Adamu U, Knollmann D, Almutairi B et al. (2010) Stress/rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients without significant coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 17: 38–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boden WE, O’Rourke RA, Teo KK et al. (2007) Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 356: 1503–1516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH et al. (2009) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360: 213–224

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hachamovitch R, Hayes SW, Friedman JD et al. (2003) Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion SPECT. Circulation 107: 2900–2906

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Maron DJ et al. (2008) Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to reduce ischemic burden. Circulation 117: 1283–1291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garcia EV, Faber TL (2009) New trends in camera and software technology in nuclear cardiology. Cardiol Clin 27: 227–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Berman DS, Kang X, Tamarapoo B et al. (2009) Stress 201Tl/rest 99mTc sequential dual isotope high-speed myocardial perfusion imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Imaging 2: 273–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demangeat, JL., Didon-Poncelet, A., Steinbach, M. (2011). Scintigraphie et ischémie myocardique en 2011. In: Imagerie en coupes du cœur et des vaisseaux. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0212-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0212-1_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0211-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0212-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics