Skip to main content

Désordres de la conscience : Aspects éthiques

  • Chapter
Coma et états de conscience altérée

Résumé

L’apparition de la ventilation mécanique dans les années cinquante et le développement des soins intensifs dans les années soixante ont permis à de nombreux patients de survivre à de graves lésions cérébrales. Bien que ces avancées technologiques soient étonnantes, de nombreux patients vont alors se retrouver dans des états cliniques critiques peu rencontrés auparavant (1). L’impact éthique de ces états d’inconscience se reflète lors de la rédaction des premiers comités de bioéthique et lors de léapparition du concept d’acharnement thérapeutique. En 1968, le comité spécial de l’école médicale de Harvard a publié un article essentiel redéfinissant la mort comme étant un coma irréversible et une perte permanente de toutes les fonctions cérébrales (2). Le comité, composé de dix médecins, d’un théologien, d’un avocat et d’un historien des sciences, a débattu des questions médicales, juridiques et sociétales quant à la prise en charge des patients en mort cérébrale. Nous donnerons ici un bref aperçu des principales questions éthiques liées à la notion de conscience et à la prise en charge médicale des patients atteints de troubles de la conscience (TDC) tels que le coma, l’état végétatif et l’état de conscience minimale. Nous mettrons également l’accent sur le problème de la gestion de la douleur et des prises de décision en fin de vie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Laureys S, Boly M (2007) What is it like to be vegetative or minimally conscious? Curr Opin Neurol 20: 609–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death (1968) A definition of irreversible coma. JAMA 205: 337–40

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zeman A (2001) Consciousness. Brain 124: 1263–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Demertzi A, Liew C, Ledoux D et al. (2009) Dualism persists in the science of mind. Ann NY Acad Sci 1157: 1–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Posner J, Saper C, Schiff N, Plum F (2007) Plum and Posner’s diagnosis of stupor and coma. New York: Oxford University Press, 4th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jennett B, Plum F (1972) Persistent vegetative state after brain damage. A syndrome in search of a name. Lancet 1: 734–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N et al. (2002) The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology 58: 349–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Schnakers C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Giacino JT et al. (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of the vegetative and minimally conscious state: clinical consensus versus standardized neurobehavioral assessment. BMC Neurol 9: 35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Owen AM, Coleman MR, Boly M et al. (2006) Detecting awareness in the vegetative state. Science 313: 1402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Monti MM, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Coleman MR et al. (2010) Willful modulation of brain activity in disorders of consciousness. N Engl J Med 362: 579–89

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Horne M (2009) Are people in a persistent vegetative state conscious? Monash Bioeth Rev 28: 12–1–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahane G, Savulescu J (2009) Brain damage and the moral significance of consciousness. J Med Philos 34: 6–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. International Association for the Study of Pain (1994) Classification of Chronic Pain: descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Task force on taxonomy. Seattle: IASP Press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Demertzi A, Schnakers C, Ledoux D et al. (2009) Different beliefs about pain perception in the vegetative and minimally conscious states: a European survey of medical and paramedical professionals. Prog Brain Res 177: 329–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fins JJ (2006) Affirming the right to care, preserving the right to die: disorders of consciousness and neuroethics after Schiavo. Palliat Support Care 4: 169–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ahronheim JC, Gasner MR (1990) The sloganism of starvation. Lancet 335: 278–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. The Medical Task Force on Anencephaly (1990) The infant with anencephaly. N Engl J Med 322: 669–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. McQuillen MP (1991) Can people who are unconscious or in the vegetative state perceive pain? Issues Law Med 6: 373–83

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Laureys S, Faymonville ME, Peigneux P et al. (2002) Cortical processing of noxious somatosensory stimuli in the persistent vegetative state. Neuroimage 17: 732–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Poldrack RA (2008) The role of fMRI in Cognitive Neuroscience: where do we stand? Curr Opin Neurobiol 18: 223–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Boly M, Faymonville ME, Schnakers C et al. (2008) Perception of pain in the minimally conscious state with PET activation: an observational study. Lancet Neurol 7: 1013–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Demertzi A, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Bruno MA et al. (2008) Is there anybody in there? Detecting awareness in disorders of consciousness. Expert Rev Neurother 8: 1719–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schnakers C, Zasler ND (2007) Pain assessment and management in disorders of consciousness. Curr Opin Neurol 20: 620–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bernat JL (2004) Ethical issues in the perioperative management of neurologic patients. Neurol Clin 22: 457–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Youngner SJ (1987) Do-not-resuscitate orders: no longer secret, but still a problem. Hastings Cent Rep 17: 24–33–27

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laureys S (2005) Science and society: death, unconsciousness and the brain. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 899–909

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Boveroux P, Kirsch M, Boly M et al. (2008) Évaluation du pronostic neurologique dans les encéphalopathies postanoxiques. Réanimation 17: 613–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rosner F (1993) Why nutrition and hydration should not be withheld from patients. Chest 104: 1892–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Steinbrook R, Lo B (1988) Artificial feeding —-solid ground, not a slippery slope. N Engl J Med 318: 286–90–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Royal College of Physicians (2003) The vegetative state: guidance on diagnosis and management. Clin Med 3: 249–54

    Google Scholar 

  31. Demertzi A, Ledoux D, Bruno MA et al. (2011) Attitudes towards end-of-life issues in disorders of consciousness: a European survey. J Neurol 258(6): 1058–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bernat JL, Steven L (2005) The concept and practice of brain death. Prog Brain Res 150: 369–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bernat JL (2002) Ethical issues in neurology. Boston: Butterworth Heinemann, second ed.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brierley JB, Graham DI, Adams JH, Simpsom JA (1971) Neocortical death after cardiac arrest. A clinical, neurophysiological, and neuropathological report of two cases. Lancet 2: 560–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bernat JL (1998) A defense of the whole-brain concept of death. Hastings Cent Rep 28: 14–23

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Engelhardt K (1998) Organ donation and permanent vegetative state. Lancet 351: 211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Truog RD, Robinson WM (2003) Role of brain death and the dead-donor rule in the ethics of organ transplantation. Crit Care Med 31: 2391–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bernat JL (2002) Clinical ethics and the Law. In: Butterworth Heinemann (ed). Ethical issues in neurology. Boston, p 79–107

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bernat JL (2002) The persistent vegetative state and related states. In: Butterworth Heinemann (ed). Ethical issues in neurology. Boston, p 283–305

    Google Scholar 

  40. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL (1994) The economics of dying. The illusion of cost savings at the end of life. N Engl J Med 330: 540–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Jennett B (1976) Editorial: Resource allocation for the severely brain damaged. Arch Neurol 33: 595–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Beresford HR (1977) The Quinlan decision: problems and legislative alternatives. Ann Neurol 2: 74–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Quill TE (2005) Terri Schiavo —-a tragedy compounded. N Engl J Med 352: 1630–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Wijdicks EFM (2008) Law and bioethics. In: The comatose patient. New York: Oxford University Press, p 201–16

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jennett B (2002) Ethical issues. In: Jennett B (ed) The vegetative state. Medical facts, ethical and legal dilemmas. Cambridge: University Press, p 97–125

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demertzi, A. et al. (2011). Désordres de la conscience : Aspects éthiques. In: Coma et états de conscience altérée. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0127-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0127-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0126-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0127-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics