Skip to main content

Résumé

Depuis quelques années, plusieurs publications ont mis en exergue l’avantage de l’examen du sperme au fort grossissement (× 6 600), permettant l’évaluation de la morphologie du noyau spermatique et la densité de sa chromatine en temps réel avant micro-injection ovocytaire. Ce procédé est communément appelé motile sperm organelle morphology examination (MSOME). La technique d’ICSI est appelée intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). En reproduction, nous déplorons hélas plus d’échecs que de succès. Les causes des échecs sont multiples, d’origine maternelle mais aussi paternelle. En effet, un sperme inadéquat peut conduire au pire à un défaut de fécondation ou de développement embryonnaire précoce et au mieux à une implantation embryonnaire suivie d’une fausse couche.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. World Health Organization (1999) WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm cervical mucus interaction. 4th ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kruger TF, Acosta AA, Simmons KF et al. (1988) Predictive value of sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 49:112–121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nagy ZP, Liu J, Joris H et al. (1995) The result of ICSI is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum Reprod 10:1123–1129

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Svalander P, Jakobsson AH, Forsberg AS et al. (1996) The outcome of ICSI is unrelated to’ strict criteria’ sperm morphology. Hum Reprod 11:1019–1022

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tezarik J, Mendoza C, Greco E (2002) Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI. Hum Reprod 17:184–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F et al. (2002) Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl 23:1–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bartoov B, Eltes F, Pansky M et al. (1994) Improved diagnosis of male fertility potential via a combination of quantitative ultramorphology and routine semen analyses. Hum Reprod 9:2069–2075

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S et al. (2005) The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Hum Reprod 20:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Ellenbogen A et al. (2006) Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod 21:1787–1790

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wittemer C, Pujol A, Boughali H, Viville S (2006) The impact of high-magnification evaluation of sperm on ART outcome. Hum Reprod 21(Suppl l):i59–i60

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F et al. (2003) Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertil Steril 80:1413–1419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hazout A, Dumont-Hassan M, Junca AM et al. (2006) High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 12:19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Lederman H et al. (2006) How to improve IVF-ICSI outcome by sperm selection. Reprod Biomed Online 12:634–638

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G et al. (2008) Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reprod Biomed Online 16:835–841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boldi Cotti P, Chigioni S, Galofre Ballesteros GM et al. (2008) Advantages of HM-ICSI for the treatment of different fertility disorders. Hum Reprod 23(Suppl 1):i157–i159

    Google Scholar 

  16. Aitken RJ, De Iuliis GN (2007) Origins and consequences of DNA damage in male germ cells. Reprod Biomed Online 14:727–733

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernández-Gonzalez R, Moreira PN, Pérez-Crespo M et al. (2008) Long-term effects of mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection with DNA-fragmented sperm on health and behaviour of adult offspring. Biol Reprod 78:761–772

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tesarik J, Greco E, Mendoza C (2004) Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation. Hum Reprod 19:611–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tesarik J (2005) Paternal effects on cell division in the human preimplantation embryo. Reprod Biomed Online 10:370–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cayli S, Jakab A, Ovari L et al. (2003) Biochemical markers of sperm function: male fertility and sperm selection for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 7:462–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Franco JG Jr, Baruffi RL, Mauri AL et al. (2008) Significance of large nuclear vacuoles in human spermatozoa: implications for ICSI. Reprod Biomed Online 17:42–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Garolla A, Fortini D, Menegazzo M et al. (2008) Highpower microscopy for selecting spermatozoa for ICSI by physiological status. Reprod Biomed Online 17:610–616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Massaro FC et al. (2008) Comparison of day 2 embryo quality after ICSI versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) using sibling oocytes. Hum Reprod 23(Suppl1):i70–i72

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vanderzwalmen P, Hiemer A, Rubner P et al. (2008) Blastocyst development after sperm selection at high magnification is associated with size and number of nuclear vacuoles. Reprod Biomed Online17:617–627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin-Segal G, Geerts L et al. (1991) Sperm morphology and IVF pregnancy rate: comparison between Percoll gradient centrifugation and swim-up procedures. Hum Reprod 6:581–588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D (1998) Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a paternal influence? Hum Reprod 13:1632–1637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Cassuto NG, Bouret D, Plouchart JM et al. (2008) A new real-time morphology classification for human spermatozoa: a link for fertilization and improved embryo quality. Fertil Steril 92:1616–1625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Peer S, Eltes F, Berkovitz A et al. (2007) Is fine morphology of the human sperm nuclei affected by in vitro incubation at 37 degrees C? Fertil Steril 88:1589–1594

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hammadeh_ME, Strehler E, Zeginiadou T et al. (2001) Chromatin decondensation of human sperm in vitro and its relation to fertilization rate after ICSI. Arch Androl 47:83–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hazout, A. et al. (2011). Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). In: Physiologie, pathologie et thérapie de la reproduction chez l’humain. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0061-5_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0060-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0061-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics