Skip to main content

Learning processes and recovery of higher functions after brain damage

  • Chapter
Rethinking physical and rehabilitation medicine

Abstract

All brain damage, whatever its nature (usually vascular or traumatic), gives rise to serious deficiencies that are often interconnected. Some may be described as elementary to the extent that they result from changes to the sensorimotor cortex or primary sensorial cortex (rolandic areas, visual cortex, or primary auditive areas), or nervous pathways originating from them or projecting out of them. Others concern the so-called higher functions based on the multimodal association cortex, of which, it should be remembered, the surface is phylogenetically most developed in the human species; the association cortex conforms to the now largely relativized principle of functional asymmetry of the hemispheres.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andrewes D, Gielewski E (1999) The work rehabilitation of a herpes simplex encephalitis patient with anterograde amnesia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 9:77–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atri A, Shanghnessy LW, Locascio JJ, Growdon JH (2008) Long-term course and effectiveness of combination therapy in Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 22(3):209–221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baddeley AD, Wilson BA (1994) When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia 32: 53–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barat M, Mazaux JM, Joseph PA (2000) Intérêt de la rééducation prolongée des aphasies en décours des accidents vasculaires cérébraux. La lettre du Neurologue 3(4):151–154

    Google Scholar 

  5. Basso A, Capitani E, Vignolo LA (1979) Influence of rehabilitation on language skills in aphasic patients: a controlled study. Arch Neurol 36(4):190–196

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ben-Yishay Y, Prigatano GP (1990) Cognitive remediation. In: Rehabilitation of the adult and child with traumatic brain injury. F.A. David, Philadelphia, pp. 393–409

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bier N, Van der Linden M, Gagnon L, et al. (2008) Face-name association learning in early Alzheimer’s disease: a comparison of learning methods and their underlying mechanisms. Neuropsychol Rehabil 18(3):343–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Booth S, Perkins L (1999) Individualized advice and evaluating change in aphasia. Aphasiology 13(4/5):283–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Camp CJ (1989) Facilitation of new learning in Alzheimer’s disease. In: Gilmore GC, Withhouse PJ, Wykle ML (eds) Memory, aging and dementia. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ceccaldi M, Clarke S, Meulemans T (2008) From perception to learning. Rev Neurol (Paris) 164:S154–S163

    Google Scholar 

  11. Changeux JP (1979) Théories du langage. Théories de l’apprentissage. Le débat entre Jean Piaget et Noam Chomsky. Centre Royaumont pour une science de l’homme. Seuil (ed), Paris, 525 pp

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, Friel JC (2004) Community integration and satisfaction with functioning after intensive cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehab 85(6):943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cicerone KD, Mott T, Azulay J, et al. (2008) A randomized controlled trial of holistic neuropsychologic rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehab 12:2239–2249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Clarke S, Bellmann A, Thiran A (2004) Auditory reflect: what and where in auditory space. Cortex 40:291–300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Constantinidou F, Thomas RD, Scharp VL, et al. (2005) Effects of categorization training in patients with TBI during post acute rehabilitation: preliminary findings. J Head Traum Rehabil 20(2):143–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cotelli M, Manenti R, Cappa SF, et al. (2006) Effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation on action naming in patients with Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol 63(11):1602–1604

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cotelli M, Manenti R, Cappa SF, et al. (2008) Transcranial magnetic stimulation improves naming in Alzheimer disease patients at different stages of cognitive decline. Eur J Neurol 15(12):1286–1292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coyette F, Van der Linden M (1999) La rééducation des troubles de la mémoire: les stratégies de facilitation. In: La rééducation en neuropsychologie: études de cas. Solal (ed), Marseille, pp. 209–225

    Google Scholar 

  19. Darrigrand B, Mazaux JM (2000) Echelle de communication verbale de Bordeaux. Ortho Edition, Isbergues, France

    Google Scholar 

  20. David GA, Wilcox MJ (1981) Incorporating parameters of natural conversation in aphasia treatment. In R. Chapey ed. Language intervention strategies in adult aphasia. Baltimore: Williams et Wilkins: 169–193

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Santis L, Spierer L, Clarke S, Murray MM (2007) Getting in touch: segregated somatosensory what and where pathways in humans revealed by electrical neuroimaging. Neuro Image 37(3):890–903

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ducarne B (1988) Rééducation sémiologique de l’aphasie. Masson (ed), Paris, 1 vol., 350 pp

    Google Scholar 

  23. Elman RJ, Bernstein-Ellis E (1999) The efficacy of group communication treatment in adults with chronic aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:411–419

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Farina E, Mantovani F, Fioravanti R, et al. (2006) Evaluating two group programmes of cognitive training in mild-to-moderate AD: is there any difference between a “global” stimulation and a “cognitive-specific” one? Aging Ment Health 10(3):211–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Galante E, Venturini G, Fiaccadori C (2007) Computer-based cognitive intervention for dementia: preliminary results of a randomized clinical trial. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 29(3):26–32

    Google Scholar 

  26. Glisky EL, Schacter DL, Tulving E (1986) Learning and retention of computer-related vocabulary in memory-impaired patients: method of vanishing cues. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 8:292–312

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Gruneberg MM, Sykes RN, Gillett E (1994) The facilitating effects of mnemonic strategies in two learning tasks in learning disabled adults. Neuropsychol Rehabil 4:241–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Laforce R (2002) Revue des mécanismes d’apprentissage par lesquels le striatum participe à l’apprentissage implicite d’habiletés. Rev Neuropsychol 12(3):379–399

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall JC, Newcombe F (1973) Patterns of paralexia: a psycholinguistic approach. J Psycholing Res 2:175–179

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Meulemans T (1998) L’apprentissage implicite. Solal (ed), Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meulemans T (2000) Neuropsychologie de l’apprentissage implicite et de la mémoire procédurale. Rev Neuropsychol 10:129–157

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mishkin M, Ungerleider LG, Macko KA (1983) Object vision and spatial vision. Trends Neurosci 6:414–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Novack TA, Caldwell SG, Duke LW, Berquist T (1996) Focused versus unstructured intervention for attention deficits after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 11(3):52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Parkin AJ, Hunkin NM, Squires EJ (1998) Unlearning John Major: the use of errorless learning in the reacquisition of proper names following herpes simplex encephalitis. Cogn Neuropsychol 15:361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ponsford JL, Kinsella G (1988) Evaluation of a remedial programme for attentional deficits following closed head injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 10:693–708

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Prigatano GP (1999) Principles of neuropsychological rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, 1 vol., 374 pp

    Google Scholar 

  37. Pulvermuller F, Neininger B, Elbert T, et al. (2001) Constraint induced therapy of chronic aphasia after stroke. Stroke 32(7):1621–1626

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ramachandran VS, Oberman LM (2006) Broken mirrors: a theory of autism Sci Am; 295(5):62–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rami L, Gironch A, Kulisevsky J et al. (2003) Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on memory subtypes: a controlled study. Neuropsychologica 41(14):1877–1883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rizzolatti G, Craighero L (2004) The mirror-neuron system. Annu Rev Neurosci 27:169–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schacter DL, Rich SA, Stampp MS (1985) Remediation of memory disorders: experimental evaluation of the spaced retrieval technique. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 7:79–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Seger CA (1994) Implicit learning. Psychol Bullet 115(2):163–196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Sekiguchi A, Kawashima R (2007) Cognitive rehabilitation — the learning therapy for the senile dementia. Brain Nerve 59(4):357–365

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Séron X (1997) La Neuropsychologie cognitive. «Que sais-je» PUF, Paris, 3ème éd

    Google Scholar 

  45. Séron X (1997) Rééducation des déficiences cognitives: perspectives théoriques actuelles. In: Ravaud JF, Didier JP, Audilloux C, Aymé S (eds) De la déficience à la réinsertion, pp. 67–86. Editions INSERM, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  46. Séron X (1999) Efficacité de la rééducation en neuropsychologie. La rééducation en neuropsychologie: etude de cas. Solal (ed), Marseille, pp. 19–40

    Google Scholar 

  47. Séron X, Rossetti Y, Vallat-Azouvi C, et al. (2008) Cognitive rehabilitation. Rev Neurol (Paris) 164:S154–S163

    Google Scholar 

  48. Soliveri P, Brown RG, Jahanshabi M, Marsden CD (1992) Procedural memory and neurological disease. Eur J Cogn Psychol 4:161–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sunderland A, Tuke A (2005) Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: a critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil 15(2):81–96

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Talassi E, Guerreschi M, Feriani M, et al. (2007) Effectiveness of a cognitive rehabilitation program in mild dementia (MD) and mild cognitive impairment: a case control study. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 44(1):391–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Thoene AT, Glisky EL (1995) Learning of name-face associations in memory impaired patients: a comparison of different training procedures. J Intern Neuropsychol Soc 1:29–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Tulving E (1995) Organisation of memory: Quo vadis? In: Gazzaniga MS (ed) The cognitive neurosciences, pp. 839–847. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  53. Vallat C, Azouvi P, Hardisson H, et al. (2005) Rehabilitation of verbal working memory after left hemisphere stroke. Brain Injury 19:1157–1164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Vallat-Azouvi C, Azouvi P, Pradat-Diehl P (2007) Rééducation cognitive de la mémoire de travail. In: Aubin G, Coyette F, Pradat-Diehl P, Vallet-Azouvi C (eds) Neuropsychologie de la mémoire de travail, pp. 195–209. Solal, Marseille

    Google Scholar 

  55. Van der Linden M, Van der Kaa MA (1989) Reorganization therapy for memory impairments. In: Séron X, Deloche G (eds) Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation, pp. 105–158. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, New York

    Google Scholar 

  56. Van der Linden M, Coyette F (1995) Acquisition of word processing knowledge in an amnesie patient: implications for theory and rehabilitation. In: Campbell R, Conway M, Gathercole S (eds) Broken memories: neuropsychological case studies, pp. 54–80. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  57. Van der Linden M, Coyette F, Majerus S (1999) La rééducation des patients amnésiques: exploitation des capacités mnésiques préservées. Ici-La rééducation en neuropsychologie: études de cas. Solal (ed), Marseille, pp. 227–248

    Google Scholar 

  58. Wiart L, Bon Saint Corne A, Debelleix X, et al. (1997) Unilateral neglect syndrome rehabilitation by trunk rotation and scanning training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:424–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wilson BA (2002) Towards a comprehensive model of cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil 12(2):97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barat, M., Mazaux, JM., Joseph, PA., Dehail, P. (2010). Learning processes and recovery of higher functions after brain damage. In: Rethinking physical and rehabilitation medicine. Collection de L’Académie Européenne de Médecine de Réadaptation. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0034-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-8178-0034-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-8178-0033-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-8178-0034-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics