Skip to main content

Meniscal sutures

  • Chapter
The Knee Joint
  • 405 Accesses

Abstract

Biomechanical and clinical trials have demonstrated the importance of the menisci for the function of the knee. The menisci increase the surface area for femoro-tibial load transmission, aid in the mechanics of joint lubrication, and act as secondary stabilizers in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)- deficient knees. Th us the focus in the treatment of meniscal tears has shifted from systematic removal of the menisci toward preservation and repair whenever possible. Nonetheless, most investigators estimate that only 10–15% of meniscal tears are reparable, usally in association with ACL reconstructions (1,2). The aim of meniscal repair is to reduce pain and possibly to restore ideal knee function by keeping the original meniscus. Indications for meniscal repair are:

  • full-thickness, vertical longitudinal tears >10 mm;

  • partial-thickness unstable vertical longitudinal tears (generally in tears >10 mm);

  • location at the meniscosynovial junction or in the vascularized red-red and red-white zones (less than 3 mm away from the meniscosynovial junction);

  • little secondary meniscal degeneration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Scott GA, Jolly BL, Henning CE (1986) Combined posterior incision and arthroscopic intra-articular repair of the meniscus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:647–661

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan CD, Wojtys EM, Casscells CD, Casscells SW (1991) Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 19:632–637

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Henning CE, Lynch MA, Clark JR (1987) Vascularity for healing of meniscus repairs. Arthroscopy 3:13–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Arnoczky SP, Warren RF (1983) The microvasculature of the meniscus and its response to injury. Am J Sports Med 11:131–141 Arnoczky SP (1992) Gross and vascular anatomy of the meniscus and its role in meniscal healing, regeneration and remodelling. In: Mow VC, Arnoczky SP, Jackson DW, editors. Knee meniscus: basic and clinical foundations. New York: Raven Press

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fox JM, Rintz KG, Ferkel RD (1993) Trephination of incomplete meniscal tears. Arthroscopy. 9(4):451–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang Z, Arnold JA (1996) Trephination and suturing of avascular meniscal tears: a clinical study of the trephination procedure. Arthroscopy 12(6):726–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McAndrews PT, Arnoczky SP (1996) Meniscal repair enhancement techniques. Clin Sports Med 15(3):499–510

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohn D (1997) Diagnostische und operative Arthroskopie großer Gelenke. Stuttgart: Thieme

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morgan CD, Casscells SW (1986) Arthroscopic meniscus repair: a safe approach to the posterior horns. Arthroscopy 2(1):3–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ross G, Grabill J, McDevitt E (2000) Chondral injury after meniscal repair with bioabsorbable arrows. Arthroscopy 16(7):754–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Seil R, Rupp S, Dienst M, Müller B, et al. (2000) Chondral lesions after arthroscopic meniscus repair using meniscus arrows. Arthroscopy 16(7): E17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zantop T, Eggers AK, Musahl V, et al. (2004) A new rigid biodegradable anchor for meniscus refi xation: biomechanical evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 12(4):317–324

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Becker R, Schroeder M, Starke C, et al. (2001) Biomechanical investigations of diff erent meniscal repair implants in comparison with horizontal sutures on human meniscus. Arthroscopy 17:439–444

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Seil R, Rupp S, Jurecka C, et al. (2003) Réparation méniscale par fixations biodégradables: étude biomécanique comparative. Rev Chir Orthop 89:35–43 Shoemaker SC, Markolf KL (1986) The role of the meniscus in the anteroposterior stability of the loaded anterior cruciate-deficient knee: effects of partial versus total excision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:71–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zantop T, Eggers AK, Weimann A, et al. (2004) Initial fixation strength of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors in comparison to conventional suture technique and rigid anchors: biomechanical evaluation of new meniscus refixation systems. Am J Sports Med 32(4):863–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Benedetto KP, Ellermann A, Große C (2001) Expertenmeinung: Meniskusrefixation. Arthroskopie 14:276–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Borden P, Nyland J, Caborn DN, Pienkowski D (2003) Biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system with vertical mattress sutures and meniscus arrows. Am J Sports Med 31(3):374–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cohen SB, Boyd L, Miller MD (2007) Vascular risk associated with meniscal repair using Rapidloc versus FasT-Fix: comparison of two all-inside meniscal devices. J Knee Surg 20(3):235–240

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Haas AL, Schepsis AA, Hornstein J, Edgar CM (2005) Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device. Arthroscopy 21(2):167–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kocabey Y, Chang HC, Brand JC, et al. (2006) A biomechanical comparison of the FasT-Fix meniscal repair suture system and the RapidLoc device in cadaver meniscus. Arthroscopy 22(4):406–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kotsovolos ES, Hantes ME, Mastrokalos DS, et al. (2006) Results of all-inside meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system. Arthroscopy 22(1):3–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nyland J, Chang H, Kocabey Y, et al. (2007) A cyclic testing comparison of FasT-Fix and RapidLoc devices in human cadaveric meniscus. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zantop T, Eggers AK, Musahl V, et al. (2005) Cyclic testing of flexible all-inside meniscus suture anchors: biomechanical analysis. Am J Sports Med 33(3):388–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang HC, Nyland J, Caborn DN, Burden R (2005) Biomechanical evaluation of meniscal repair systems: a comparison of the Meniscal Viper Repair System, the vertical mattress FasT-Fix Device, and vertical mattress ethibond sutures. Am J Sports Med 33(12):1846–1852

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chang HC, Caborn DN, Nyland J, Burden R (2006) Effect of lesion location on fixation strength of the meniscal viper repair system: an in vitro study using porcine menisci. Arthroscopy 22(4):394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Albrecht-Olsen P, Lind T, Kristensen G, Falkenberg B (1997) Failure strength of a new meniscus arrow repair technique: biomechanical comparison with horizontal suture. Arthroscopy 13:183–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Asik M, Sener N, Akpinar S, et al. (1997) Strength of different meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:80–83 Asik M, Sener N (2002) Failure strength of repair devices versus meniscus suturing techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(1):25–29

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Barber FA, Herbert MA (2000) Meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy 16(6):613–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Richards DP (2004) Load to failure testing of new meniscal repair devices. Arthroscopy 20(1):45–50 Barrett GR, Field MH, Treacy SH, Ruff CG (1998) Clinical results of meniscus repair in patients 40 years and older. Arthroscopy 14:824–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Becker R, Starke C, Heymann M, Nebelung W (2002) Biomechanical properties under cyclic loading of seven meniscus repair techniques. Clin Orthop 400:236–45

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Bellemans J, Vandenneucker H, Labely L, Van Audekercke R (2002) Fixation strength of meniscal repair devices. Knee 9(1):11–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Boenisch UW, Faber KJ, Ciarelli M, et al. (1999) Pull-out strength and stiff ness of meniscal repair using absorbable arrows or Ti-Cron vertical and horizontal loop sutures. Am J Sports Med 27:626–631

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Dervin GF, Downing KJ, Keene GC, McBride DG (1997) Failure strengths of suture versus biodegradable arrow for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Arthroscopy 13:296–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dürselen L, Schneider J, Galler M, et al. (2003) Cyclic joint loading can affect the initial stability of meniscal fixation implants. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18 (1):44–49 Dürselen L, Hebisch A, Claes LE, Bauer G (2003) Gapping phenomenon of longitudinal meniscal tears. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 18(6):505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Fisher SR, Markel DC, Koman JD, Atkinson TS (2002) Pull-out and shear failure strengths of arthroscopic meniscal repair systems. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 10(5):294–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McDermott ID, Richards SW, Hallam P, et al. (2003) A biomechanical study of four different meniscal repair systems, comparing pull-out strengths and gapping under cyclic loading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(1):23–29

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Post WR, Akers SR, Kish V (1997) Load to failure of common meniscal repair techniques: effects of suture technique and suture material. Arthroscopy 13:731–736

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rankin CC, Lintner DM, Noble PC, et al. (2002) A biomechanical analysis of meniscal repair techniques. Am J Sports Med 30(4):492–497

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Rimmer MG, Nawana NS, Keene GC, Pearcy MJ (1995) Failure strengths of diff erent meniscal suturing techniques. Arthroscopy 11:146–150 Rockborn P, Gillquist J (1995) Outcome of arthroscopic meniscectomy: a 13-year physical and radiological follow-up of 43 patients under 23 years of age. Acta Orthop Scand 66:113–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Seil R, Rupp S, Kohn D (2000) Cyclic testing of meniscus sutures. Arthroscopy 16(4):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  41. Seil R, Rupp S, Jurecka C, Kohn D (2001) Biomechanical evaluation of new meniscus fixation devices. ISAKOS, May 14–18, Montreux, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  42. Seil R, Rupp S, Jurecka C, et al. (2001) Der Einfluß verschiedener Nahtstärken auf das Verhalten von Meniskusnähten unter zyklischer Zugbelastung. Unfallchirurg 104(5):392–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Song EK, Lee KB (1999) Biomechanical test comparing the load to failure of the biodegradable meniscus arrow versus meniscal suture. Arthroscopy 15(7):726–732

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Kohn D, Siebert W (1989) Meniscus suture techniques: a comparative biomechanical cadaver study. Arthroscopy 5:324–327

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dienst M, Seil R, Kühne M, Kohn D (2001) Cyclic testing of meniscal sutures after in vitro culture. Congress of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Montreux, May 14–18

    Google Scholar 

  46. Seil R, Rupp S, Kohn D (2001) Technik und Biomechanik der Meniskusrekonstruktion. Arthroskopie 14:254–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Arnoczky SP, Lavagnino M (2001) Tensile fixation strengths of absorbable meniscal repair devices as a function of hydrolysis time. An in vitro experimental study. Am J Sports Med 29(2):118–123

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Port J, Jackson DW, Lee TQ, Simon TM (1996) Meniscal repair supplemented with exogenous fibrin clot and autogenous cultured marrow cells in the goat model. Am J Sports Med 24:547–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kawai Y, Fukubayashi T, Nishino J (1989) Meniscal suture. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Orthop Relat Res 243:286–293

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Roeddecker K, Muennich U, Nagelschmidt M (1994) Meniscal healing: a biomechanical study. J Surg Res 56:20–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Koukoubis TD, Glisson RR, Feagin JAJ, et al. (1997) Meniscal fixation with an absorbable staple. An experimental study in dogs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:22–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Guisasola I, Vaquero J, Forriol F (2002) Knee immobilization on meniscal healing after suture: an experimental study in sheep. Clin Orthop Relat Res 395:227–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Cook JL, Fox DB (2007) A novel bioabsorbable conduit augments healing of avascular meniscal tears in a dog model. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1877–1887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kirsch L, Kohn D, Glowik A (1999) Forces in medial and lateral meniscus sutures during knee extension — an in vitro study. J Biomech 31(Suppl 1):104

    Google Scholar 

  55. Dürselen L, Hebisch A, Wagner D, et al. (2007) Meniscal screw fixation provides sufficient stability to prevent tears from gapping. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 22(1):93–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Becker R, Brettschneider O, Gröbel KH, et al. (2006) Distraction forces on repaired bucket-handle lesions in the medial meniscus. Am J Sports Med 34(12):1941–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zantop T, Temmig K, Weimann A, et al. (2006) Elongation and structural properties of meniscal repair using suture techniques in distraction and shear force scenarios: biomechanical evaluation using a cyclic loading protocol. Am J Sports Med 34(5):799–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bray RC, et al. (2000) Prolonged meniscal hyperaemia following anterior cruciate ligament injury. Trans Orth Res Soc

    Google Scholar 

  59. Bray RC, et al. (2001) Vascular response of the meniscus to injury: eff ect of immobilization. J Orthop Res

    Google Scholar 

  60. DeHaven KE, Lohrer WA, Lovelock JE (1995) Long term results of open meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med 23:524–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Rubman MH, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD (1998) Arthroscopic repair of meniscal tears that extend into the avascular zone: A review of 198 single and complex tears. Am J Sports Med 26:87–95

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Verdonk PC, Forsyth RG, Wang J, et al. (2005) Characterisation of human knee meniscus cell phenotype. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13(7):548–560

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Bhargava MM, Attia ET, Murrell GA, et al. (1999) The effect of cytokines on the proliferation and migration of bovine meniscal cells. Am J Sports Med 27(5):636–643

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Tumia NS, Johnstone AJ (2004) Promoting the proliferative and synthetic activity of knee meniscal fibrochondrocytes using basic fi broblast growth factor in vitro. Am J Sports Med 32(4):915–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Kambic HE, Futani H, McDevitt CA (2000) Cell, matrix changes and alpha-smooth muscle actin expression in repair of the canine meniscus. Wound Repair Regen 8(6):554–561

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Lin BY, Richmond JC, Spector M (2002) Contractile actin expression in torn human menisci. Wound Repair Regen 10(4):259–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Becker R, Pufe T, Kulow S, et al. (2004) Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor during healing of the meniscus in a rabbit model. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(7):1082–1087

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Peretti GM, Gill TJ, Xu JW, et al. (2004) Cell-based therapy for meniscal repair: a large animal study. Am J Sports Med 32(1):146–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Small NC (1986) Complications in arthroscopy: the knee and other joints. Arthroscopy 4:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  70. Benedetto KP (1989) Die Bedeutung und Indikation der Meniskusnaht. Chirurg 60:760–764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Cameron H (1990) Tips of the trade 20. A simple method of meniscal suture. Orthop Rev 19:103–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Janousek A, Beer T, Pelinka H, Hertz H (1998) Langzeitergebnisse nach Meniskusrefi xation. Arthroskopie 11:94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Kimura M, Hagiwara A, Hasegawa A (1993) Cyst of the medial meniscus after arthroscopic meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med 21:755–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Miller DB (1988) Arthroscopic meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med 16:315–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Rühmann O, Kohn D, Sander-Beuermann A (1996) Läsionen des N. saphenus durch arthroskopische mediale Meniskusnaht und ihre Vermeidung. Arthroskopie 9:281–284

    Google Scholar 

  76. Ryu RK, Dunbar WH (1988) Arthroscopic meniscus repair with two-year follow-up: a clinical review. Arthroscopy 4:168–173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Salisbury RB, Nottage WM (1989) A simple method of meniscus repair. Arthroscopy 5:346–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Villiger A, Mayer M (1997) Mittelfristige Ergebnisse nach arthroskopischer Meniskusnaht. Swiss Surg 3:149–153 Walsh SP, Evans SL, O’Doherty DM, Barlow IW (2001) Failure strengths of suture vs. Biodegradable arrow and staple for meniscal repair: an in vitro study. Knee 8(2):151–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Jurist KA, Greene PW, Shirkhoda A (1989) Peroneal nerve dysfunction as a complication of lateral meniscus repair: a case report and anatomic dissection. Arthroscopy 5:141–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Oliverson TJ, Lintner DM (2000) Biofix arrow appearing as a subcutaneous foreign body. Arthroscopy 16:652–655

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Menche DS, Phillips GI, Pitman MI, Steiner GC (1999) Inflammatory foreign-body reaction to an arthroscopic bioabsorbable meniscal arrow repair. Arthroscopy 15:770–772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Anderson K, Marx RG, Hannafin J, Warren RF (2000) Chondral injury following meniscal repair with a biodegradable implant. Arthroscopy 16:749–753 Arnoczky SP, Warren RF (1982) Microvasculature of the human meniscus. Am J Sports Med 10(2):90–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Ménétrey J, Seil R, Rupp S, Fritschy D (2002) Chondral damage after meniscal repair with the use of a bioabsorbable implant. Am J Sports Med 30(6):896–899

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Henning CE (1983) Arthroscopic repair of meniscus tears. Orthopedics 6:1130–1132

    Google Scholar 

  85. Albrecht-Olsen P, Kristensen G, Burgaard P, et al. (1999) The arrow versus horizontal suture in arthroscopic meniscus repair. A prospective randomized study with arthroscopic evaluation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 7:268–273.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Cannon WD, Vittori JM (1992) The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructed knees versus stable knees. Am J Sports Med 20:176–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Seil R, Kohn D (2001) Meniskusrekonstruktion — bewährte und innovative Verfahren. Unfallchirurg 104(4):274–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Asahina S, Muneta T, Yamamoto H (1996) Arthroscopic meniscal repair in conjunction with anterior cruciateligament reconstruction: factors aff ecting the healing rate. Arthroscopy 12:541–545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Valen B, Molster A (1994) Meniscal lesions treated with suture: a follow-up study using survival analysis. Arthroscopy 10:654–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Cannon WD, Morgan CD (1994) Meniscal repair: arthroscopic repair techniques. Instr Course Lect 43:77–96. Review Cannon WD (1996) Arthroscopic meniscal repair. In: McGinty JB, Caspari RB, Jackson RW, editors. Operative arthroscopy. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven:299–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Buseck MS, Noyes FR (1991) Arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal repairs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and immediate motion. Am J Sports Med 19:489–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Tenuta JJ, Arciero RA (1994) Arthroscopic evaluation of meniscal repairs.Factors that eff ect healing. Am J Sports Med 22:797–802

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Horibe S, Shino K, Maeda A, et al. (1996) Results of isolated meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 12:150–155

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Abdelkafy A, Aigner N, Zada M, et al. (2007) Two to nineteen years follow-up of arthroscopic meniscal repair using the outside-in technique: a retrospective study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 127(4):245–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Eggli S, Wegmüller H, Kosina J, et al. (1995) Long-term results of arthroscopic meniscal repair. An analysis of isolated tears. Am J Sports Med 23(6):715–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Johnson MJ, Lucas GL, Dusek JK, Henning CE (1999) Isolated arthroscopic meniscal repair: a long-term outcome study (more than 10 years). Am J Sports Med 27(1):44–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Kimura M, Shirakura K, Higuchi H, et al. (2004) Eight-to 14-year followup of arthroscopic meniscal repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:175–180 King D. (1936) Th e healing of semilunar cartilages. J Bone Joint Surg Am 18:333–342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Majewski M, Stoll R, Widmer H, et al. (2006) Midterm and long-term results after arthroscopic suture repair of isolated, longitudinal, vertical meniscal tears in stable knees. Am J Sports Med 34(7):1072–1076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Muellner T, Egkher A, Nikolic A, et al. (1999) Open meniscal repair: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings after twelve years. Am J Sports Med 27:16–20.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Rockborn P, Messner K (2000) Long-term results of meniscus repair and meniscectomy: a 13-year functional and radiographic follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:2–10

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Rockborn P, Gillquist J (2000) Results of open meniscus repair. Long-term follow-up study with a matched uninjured control group. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:494–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Steenbrugge F, Verdonk R, Verstraete K (2002) Long-term assessment of arthroscopic meniscus repair: a 13-year follow-up study. Knee 9(3):181–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Lee GP, Diduch DR (2005) Deteriorating outcomes after meniscal repair using the Meniscus Arrow in knees undergoing concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: increased failure rate with long-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med 33(8):1138–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Siebold R, Dehler C, Boes L, Ellermann A (2007) Arthroscopic all-inside repair using the Meniscus Arrow: long-term clinical follow-up of 113 patients. Arthroscopy 23(4):394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Rosenberg TD, Scott SM, Coward DB, et al. (1986) Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated with repeat arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 2(1):14–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilmes, P., Pape, D., Seil, R. (2012). Meniscal sutures. In: The Knee Joint. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99353-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99353-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99352-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99353-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics