Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Règles générales de décontamination après une épizootie d’influenza aviaire ou de maladie de Newcastle

  • Chapter
Influenza aviaire et maladie de Newcastle

  • 275 Accesses

Résumé

La mise en application rapide de mesures de biosécurité strictes représente la premièreétape de prévention et de contrôle de l’introduction des virus de l’influenza aviaire (IA) ou de la maladie de Newcastle (MN). Les deux composantes de la biosécurité sont: la bioexclusion et la biocontention. La bioexclusion englobe les mesures visant à exclure tout agent infectieux des locaux contaminés. Elle nécessite la prévention des contacts directs et indirects avec les volailles, les animaux infectés ou les matières contaminées. La biocontention regroupe les mesures visant à contenir le virus au sein des locaux contaminés, là où le premier diagnostic aété obtenu. Lors du processus de biocontention, il est nécessaire de décontaminer la ferme infectée (EFSA 2005). La propagation secondaire de l’IA et de la MN s’effectue principalement par le biais d’activités humaines telles que les déplacements des personnels, des véhicules, deséquipements et d’autres matériels contaminés.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  • Ahlvers (2003) Personal communication to Justin Kastner regarding Kansas State University College of Veterinary Medicine incinerator: Dennis Ahlvers (Physical Plant Supervisor, Kansas State University)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan, Version 3.1, 2006. Disease Strategy. Avian influenza. Interim Draft

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan, Version 3.1, 2006. Disease Strategy. Newcastle disease

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Operational Procedures Manual Disposal, Version 3.0, 2007. Carcass Disposal: A Comprehensive Review

    Google Scholar 

  • National Agricultural Biosecurity Center Consortium US-DA APHIS Cooperative Agreement Project Carcass Disposal Working Group, August 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Operational Procedures Manual, Version 3.0, 2006. Destruction of animals: A manual of techniques of humane destruction

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Operational Procedures Manual, 2000. Decontamination

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausvetplan Australian Veterinary Emergency Plan. Persistence of Disease Agents in Carcases and Animal Products. Report for Animal Health Australia, by Scott Williams. Consulting Pty Ltd Revised — December 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Beard CW, Hanson HP (1984) Newcastle Disease. In: Diseases of poultry. Hofstad MS, Barnes HJ, Calnek BW, Reid WM, Yoder HW (eds), 8th ed, Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press, pp. 452–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglez B (2003) Disposal of poultry carcasses in catastrophic avian influenza outbreaks: A comparison of methods (technical report for Master of Public Health). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr L, Broide HL, John HM et al. (1998) Composting catastrophic event poultry mortalities. Maryland: University of Maryland & Maryland Cooperative Extension. Retrieved April 21, 2003, from http://www.agnr.umd.edu/MCE/Publications/Publication.cfm?ID=35

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane N (1997) Animal disposal and the environment. State Veterinary Journal 7(3):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison S, Benson CE, Ziegler AF, Eckroade RJ (1999) Evaluation of disinfectants with the addition of an-tifreezing compounds against non pathogenic H7N2 avian influenza virus. Avian Dis 43(3):533–537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Benedictis P, Beato MS, Capua I (2007) Inactivation of avian influenza viruses by chemical agents and physical conditions: a review. Zoonoses Public Health 54(2):51–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (2005) Animal health and welfare aspects of Avian Influenza. The EFSA Journal 266:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis D (2001) Carcass disposal issues in recent disasters, accepted methods, and suggested plan to mitigate future events (applied research project for Master of Public Administration). San Marcos, Texas: Texas State University — San Marcos (formerly Southwest Texas State University)

    Google Scholar 

  • EPAA European Partnership for Alternative Approaches to Animal Testing (2002) Abattoirs: air emission control. Retrieved June 19, 2003, from http://www.epa.nsw.gov.au/mao/abattoirs.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory GA, Peer RW, Bendfeldt ES (2006) Evaluation of Poultry Carcass Disposal Methods Used During an Avian Influenza Outbreak in Virginia in 2002. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford G (2003) Disposal Technology Seminar on Air-Curtain Incineration. Kansas City, Missouri: Midwest Regional Carcass Disposal Conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford WB (1994) Swine carcass disposal evaluation using air curtain incinerator system, model TCh.2. ?Incineration 25:359 (Foreign Animal Disease Report, 22-2; reprinted by Air Burners, LLC, at http://www.airburners.com/DATAFILES_Tech/ab_swine_report.pdf url). Washington: USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman R, Fleming R (2003) Water quality impacts of burying livestock mortalities. Livestock Mortality Recycling Project Steering Committee, August 2003, Ridgetown, Ontario, Canada. Available at http://www.ridgetownc.on.ca/research/documents/fleming_carcassburial.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville TD (1993) Groundwater impacts of on farm live-stock burial. Iowa Groundwater Quarterly 4:21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville TD (2000) Impact of livestock burial on shallow groundwater quality. Paper presented at ASAE Mid-Central Meeting, St. Joseph, Missouri (No. MC00-116)

    Google Scholar 

  • Haug RT (1993) The practical handbook of compost engineering. Boca Raton, Florida: Lewis Publishers, Press, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickman M (2003) Disposal of END waste in southern California by landfill. Kansas City, Missouri: Midwest Regional Carcass Disposal Conference

    Google Scholar 

  • Keener HM, Elwell DL, Monnin MJ (2000) Procedures and equations for sizing of structures and windrows for composting animal mortalities. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 16(6):681–692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhtar S, Auvermann BW, Heflin K, Boriack CN (2003) A low maintenance approach to large carcass composting. Paper written for presentation at the 2003 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Paper Number: 032263

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DW, Carr LE (1991) Composting dead birds. Extension Sections in Departments of Poultry Science and Agricultural Engineering, University of Maryland at College Park. Fact sheet 537. Retrieved on April 11, 2003 from http://www.agnr.umd.edu/MCE/Publications/Publication.cfm?ID=145&cat=3

    Google Scholar 

  • NABC National Agricultural Biosecurity Center Consortium. USDA APHIS Cooperative Agreement Project. Carcass Disposal Working Group, August 2004. Carcass Disposal: A Comprehensive Review

    Google Scholar 

  • NAO National Audit Office (2002) The 2001 outbreak of foot and mouth disease. London: UK. National Audit Office

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll H, Youngner JS (1959) Virus-lipid interactions. II. The mechanism of adsorption of lipophilic viruses to water-insoluble polar lipids. Virology 8(3):319–343

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ockerman HW, Hansen CL (2000) Rendering: Animal by-product processing and utilization. Washington, DC: CRC Press LLC

    Google Scholar 

  • Osue (2000) Ohio’s livestock and poultry mortality composting manual. Columbus, Ohio, USA: The Ohio State University Extension, available at http://www.oardc.ohio-state.edu/ocamm/Keener-Maine%20Morta-lity%20Paper%205-24-05.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter WF, Chirnside AE (1990) Dead bird disposal and ground-water quality. Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Agricultural and Food Processing Wastes, Chicago, Illinois, pp 414–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter WF, Chirnside AE (1995) Impact of dead bird disposal pits on ground-water quality on the Delmarva Peninsula. Bioresource Technology 53:105–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riverside County Waste Management Department. Landfill fees. Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://www.rivcowm.org/landfill_fees_02.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Romans JR, Costello WJ, Carlson CW et al. (2001) Packing house by-products. In: The Meat We Eat. Danville, Illinois: Interstate Publishers, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynk R (1992) On-farm composting handbook. Ithaca, New York: Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service

    Google Scholar 

  • Samberg Y, Meroz M (1995) Application of disinfectants in poultry hatcheries. Rev Sci Tech 14(2):365–380

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UK Environment Agency (2001) The environmental impact of the foot and mouth disease outbreak: an interim assessment

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. (1995). Decision-makers’ guide to solid waste management (Vol. 2). Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • UKDEFRA United Kingdom Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (2000). The BSE Inquiry: The Report. Vol. 13: Industry Processes and Controls. Ch. 6: Rendering. Annex B: Manufacturing process of rendering. Retrieved June 10, 2003, from http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/report/volume13/chapterj.htm

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Maria Serena Beato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paola De Benedictis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Istituto Zooprofi lattico Sperimentale delle Venezie, Legnaro, Padoue, Italie

    Ilaria Capua (Chef du service de virologie Directeur de l’OIE/FAO et du laboratoire national de référence pour l’influenza aviaire et la maladie de Newcastle) (Chef du service de virologie Directeur de l’OIE/FAO et du laboratoire national de référence pour l’influenza aviaire et la maladie de Newcastle)

  2. Agences des laboratoires vétérinaires, Weybridge, Royaume-Uni

    Dennis J. Alexander (Ancien directeur laboratoire de référence de l’UE OIE/FAO pour l’influenza aviaire et la maladie de Newcastle) (Ancien directeur laboratoire de référence de l’UE OIE/FAO pour l’influenza aviaire et la maladie de Newcastle)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beato, M.S., De Benedictis, P. (2013). Règles générales de décontamination après une épizootie d’influenza aviaire ou de maladie de Newcastle. In: Capua, I., Alexander, D.J. (eds) Influenza aviaire et maladie de Newcastle. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99337-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation