Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Appareil fléchisseur : traitement des adhérences

  • Chapter
La traumatologie des parties molles de la main

Part of the book series: Approche pratique en orthopédie-traumatologie ((APPRPRAT))

  • 532 Accesses

Résumé

Les adhérences péritendineuses ne sont pas la seule cause de limitation de la mobilité active après lésion des tendons fléchisseurs. Raccourcissement tendineux excessif, rupture secondaire, raideur articulaire, lésion des poulies, effet quadrige, rétraction intrinsèque et/ou rétinaculaire, adhérences au niveau de l’appareil extenseur, bride rétractile cutanée, défaut de commande peuvent intervenir de façon isolée ou associée.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Hume MC, Gellman H, McKellop H, Brumfield RH (1990) Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand. J Hand Surg 15A: 240–243

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boyes J (1950) Flexor-tendon grafts in the fingers and thumb. An evaluation of the results. J Bone Joint Surg 32A: 489–499

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hunter JM, Salisbury RE (1971) Flexor-tendon reconstruction in severely damaged hands. A two-stage procedure using a silicone-dacron reinforced gliding prosthesis prior to tendon grafting. J Bone Joint Surg 53A: 829–858

    Google Scholar 

  4. Foucher G, Lenoble E, Ben Youssef K, Sammut D (1993) A post-operative regime after digital flexor tenolysis. A series of 72 patients. J Hand Surg 18B: 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fetrow KO (1967) Tenolysis in the hand and wrist. A clinical evaluation of two hundred and twenty flexor and extensor tenolyses. J Bone Joint Surg 49A: 667–685

    Google Scholar 

  6. Verdan CE (1972) Half a century of flexor-tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies. J Bone Joint Surg 54A: 472–491

    Google Scholar 

  7. Foucher G, Lenoble E, Ben Youssef K, Sammut D (1993) A post-operative regime after digital flexor tenolysis. A series of 72 patients. J Hand Surg 18B: 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wray RC, Moucharafieh B, Weeks PM (1978) Experimental study of the optimal time for tenolysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 61: 184

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Azari KK, Meals RA (2005) Flexor tenolysis. Hand Clin 21: 211–217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hunter JM, Schneider LH, Dumont J, Erickson JC (1974) Adynamic approach to problems of hand function using local anesthesia supplemented by intravenous fentanyl-droperidol. Clin Orthop Relat Res 104: 112–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider LH (1996) Tenolysis and capsulectomy after hand fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 327: 72–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Whiteker JH, Strickland JW, Ellis RK (1977) The role of flexor tenolysis in the palm and digits. J Hand Surg 2A: 462–470

    Google Scholar 

  13. Strickland JW (1985) Flexor tenolysis. Hand Clin 1: 121–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rouhier F (1950) La restauration du tendon long fléchisseur du pouce sans sacrifice du tendon primitif. J Chir 66: 8–9

    Google Scholar 

  15. Le Viet D (1986) Flexor tendon lengthening at musculo-tendinous junction. Ann Plast Surg 17: 239–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Verdan C, Michon J (1957) Tendolysis of flexor tendons; indications in cicatricial blocking. Rev Med Nancy 82: 69–79

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mentzel M, Hoss H, Keppler P, Ebinger T, Kinzl L, Wachter NJ (2000) The effectiveness of ADCON-T/N, a new anti-adhesion barrier gel, in fresh divisions of the flexor tendons in Zone II. J Hand Surg 25B: 590–592

    Google Scholar 

  18. Golash A, Kay A, Warner JG, Peck F, Watson JS, Lees VC (2003) Efficacy of ADCON-T/N after primary flexor tendon repair in Zone II: a controlled clinical trial. J Hand Surg 28B: 113–115

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liew SH, Potokar T, Bantick GL, Morgan I, Ford C, Murison MS (2001) The use of ADCON-T/N after repair of zone II flexor tendons. Chir Main 20: 384–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Merle M, Lallemand B, Lim A, Gantois M (2008) Experimental and clinical evaluation of an absorbable biomaterial inducing an ant-adhesive barrier (Divide®). Eur J Orthop Surg 18: 255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Strickland JW (1989) Flexor tendon surgery. Part 2: Free tendon grafts and tenolysis. J Hand Surg 14B: 368–382

    Google Scholar 

  22. Goloborod’ko SA (1999) Postoperative management of flexor tenolysis. J Hand Ther 12: 330–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yamazaki H, Kato H, Uchiyama S, Ohmoto H, Minami A (2008) Results of tenolysis for flexor tendon adhesion after phalangeal fracture. J Hand Surg 33E: 557–560

    Google Scholar 

  24. Eggli S, Dietsche A, Vogelin E (2005) Tenolysis after combined digital injuries in zone II. Ann Plast Surg 55: 266–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jupiter JB, Pess GM, Bour CJ (1989) Results of flexor tendon tenolysis after replantation in the hand. J Hand Surg 14A: 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  26. Diao E, Eaton RG (1993) Total collateral ligament excision for contractures of the proximal interphalangeal joint. J Hand Surg 18A: 395–402

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sprague BL (1976) Proximal interphalangeal joint contractures and their treatment. J Trauma 16: 259–265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Inoue G (1991) Lateral band release for post-traumatic extension contracture of the proximal interphalangeal joint. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 110: 298–300

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Gould JS, Nicholson BG (1979) Capsulectomy of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints. J Hand Surg 4A: 482–486

    Google Scholar 

  30. Young VL, Wray RC, Jr., Weeks PM (1978) The surgical management of stiff joints in the hand. Plast Reconstr Surg 62: 835–841

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Harrison DH (1977) The stiff proximal interphalangeal joint. Hand 9: 102–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rhode CM, Jennings WD, Jr. (1971) Operative treatment of the stiff proximal interphalangeal joint. Am Surg 37: 44–59

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bruser P, Poss T, Larkin G (1999) Results of proximal interphalangeal joint release for flexion contractures: midlateral versus palmar incision. J Hand Surg 24A: 288–294

    Google Scholar 

  34. Curtis RM (1970) Surgical restoration of motion in the stiff interphalangeal joints of the hand. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 31: 1–6

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ghidella SD, Segalman KA, Murphey MS (2002) Long-term results of surgical management of proximal interphalangeal joint contracture. J Hand Surg 27A: 799–805

    Google Scholar 

  36. Saffar P (1983) Total anterior teno-arthrolysis. Report of 72 cases. Ann Chir Main 2: 345–350

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Saffar P (1986) La ténoarthrolyse totale antérieure. In: Tubiana R (ed). Traité de chirurgie de la main. Masson, Paris, p. 274–281

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lorea P, Chahidi N, Marchesi S, Ezzedine R, Marin Braun F, Dury M (2006) Reconstruction of fingertip defects with the neurovascular tranquilli-leali flap. J Hand Surg 31B: 280–284

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lorea P, Medina Henriquez J, Navarro R, Legaillard P, Foucher G (2007) Anterior tenoarthrolysis for severe flexion contracture of the fingers (the “TATA” operation): a review of 50 cases. J Hand Surg 32E: 224–229

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de chirurgie de la main et du membre supérieur, chirurgie des nerfs périphériques Hôpital Lapeyronie, CHU Montpellier, 34295, Montpellier Cedex 5

    M. Chammas, B. Coulet, C. Lazerges & J. -C. Rouzaud

  2. Unité de rééducation de la main et du membre supérieur, CRRF du Docteur Ster, 9, avenue Jean Ster, 34240, Lamalou-Les-Bains

    M. -N. Thaury

  3. Institut de la Main, Clinique Clémentville, 25, rue Clémentville, 34070, Montpellier

    J. -C. Rouzaud

Authors
  1. M. Chammas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Coulet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Lazerges
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. -N. Thaury
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. -C. Rouzaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chammas, M., Coulet, B., Lazerges, C., Thaury, M.N., Rouzaud, J.C. (2011). Appareil fléchisseur : traitement des adhérences. In: La traumatologie des parties molles de la main. Approche pratique en orthopédie-traumatologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99068-7_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-99068-7_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-99067-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-99068-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation