Skip to main content

Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique Without Fracture Table

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mini-Invasive Surgery of the Hip

Abstract

Objective. To describe the minimally invasive anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating room table and report the short-term outcomes in a series of 128 patients. Indications. So-called primary osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and degenerative arthritis of the hip. Contraindications. Complex primary hips might be avoided, such as hips after prior hip surgery, revision total hip arthroplasty, posterior acetabular deficiency, proximal femoral deformities, or difficult dysplastic cases as a Crowe type 4 deformity. Surgical Technique. Through a straight 8–10 cm incision starting 2 cm lateral and distal to the ASIS the fascia of the TFL is opened anteriorly. After obtaining hemostasis, the rectus femoris is identified and retracted medially with or without transecting the indirect head. The gluteus medius and minimus and TFL are retracted laterally to expose the hip capsule. After capsulectomy and femoral neck osteotomy, the acetabulum is exposed. The patients’ legs are placed in the figure-of-four position, with the operative hip extended and the femur externally rotated to expose the femoral canal. A press fit or cemented femoral component can be used with this approach. Postoperative Management. Postoperatively, hip flexion is limited to 90° for 4 weeks. Patients are encouraged to ambulate on postoperative day 1 and are usually ready for discharge to home by postoperative day 4. Results. One hundred and 141 hips were operated on in 128 patients during a 1-year period (2007). There were 26 cemented femoral stems implanted, and 115 were press fit. All acetabular components were press fit. The mean patient age was 68 years, of which 84 were females and 57 were males. The average operative time ranged from 60 to 75 min. There were three complications: one dislocation (0.7 %) which did not require treatment and two revisions (1.4 %) for a socket fracture after a low velocity trauma and a cup revision for persistent iliopsoas pain. Radiographic evaluation of acetabular cup position demonstrated the median abduction angle of 44° and anteversion of 23°.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berger RA (2004) Mini-incision total hip replacement using an anterolateral approach: technique and results. Orthop Clin North Am 35:143–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Berry DJ (2005) “Minimally invasive” total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:699–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ciminiello M et al (2006) Total hip arthroplasty: is small incision better? J Arthroplasty 21:484–488

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kennon RE et al (2003) Total hip arthroplasty through a minimally invasive anterior surgical approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 4):39–48

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dorr LD et al (2007) Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1153–1160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duwelius PJ, Dorr LD (2008) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: an overview of the results. Instr Course Lect 57:215–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Berger RA (2003) Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417:232–241

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakamura S et al (2004) Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:214–217

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith-Petersen MN (1949) Approach to and exposure of the hip joint for mold arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 31A:40–46

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Judet J, Judet R (1950) The use of an artificial femoral head for arthroplasty of the hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 32-B:166–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dosanjh S et al (2009) The final straw: a qualitative study to explore patient decisions to undergo total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129(6):719–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Paillard P (2007) Hip replacement by a minimal anterior approach. Int Orthop 31(Suppl 1):S13–S15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meneghini RM et al (2006) Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:293–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Matta JM et al (2005) Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:115–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laude F (2006) Total hip arthroplasty through an anterior Hueter minimally invasive approach. Interact Surg 1:5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakata K et al (2008) A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 426:698–704

    Google Scholar 

  17. Siguier T et al (2004) Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:164–173

    Google Scholar 

  18. Woo RY, Morrey BF (1982) Dislocations after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1295–1306

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brooker AF et al (1973) Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 55:1629–1632

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rachbauer F (2006) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Anterior approach. Orthopade 35:723–724, 726–729

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Leunig MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kain, M.S.H., Leunig, M. (2014). Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty: Technique Without Fracture Table. In: Poitout, D., Judet, H. (eds) Mini-Invasive Surgery of the Hip. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-79931-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-79931-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-79930-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-79931-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics