Abstrait
En ce qui concerne la médecine moderne rationnelle et scientifique, la pression de la société sur les praticiens est en augmentation permanente. La bonne santé est considérée comme un droit plutôt qu’un privilège, et l’attente de la population est que les maladies soient guéries rapidement et efficacement. Ceci s’applique à toutes les maladies, dont l’infécondité.
Bibliographie
Berry JJ (2002) Congenital anomalies after IVF/ICSI. Tulane Law Review 72:248–256
Clements S, Cooke ID, Barratt CL (1995) Implementing comprehensive quality control in the andrology laboratory. Hum Reprod 10:2096–2106
Cleophas TJ (1996) Clinical trials: design flaws associated with use of a placebo. Am J Ther 3:529–534
Comhaire FH, Mahmoud AM (2004) Editorial commentary. J Androl 25:771–772
Editorial (1997) Meta-analysis under scrutiny. Lancet 350:675
Ellis SJ, Adams RF (1997) The cult of the double-blind placebo controlled trial. Br J Clin Pract 51:36–39
Evers J, Collins J (2004) Surgery or embolisation for varicocele in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD000479
Fergusson D, Glass KC, Waring D, Shapiro S (2004) Turning a blind eye: the success of blinding reported in a random sample of randomised, placebo controlled trials. BMJ 328:432
Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S (2002) The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 346:725–730
Hope T (1995) Evidence based medicine and ethics. J Med Ethics 21:259–260
In’t Veld P, Brandenburgh H, Verhoeff A, Dhont M, Los F (1995) Sex chromosomal abnormalities and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Lancet 346:773
Kaptchuk TJ (2001) The double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: gold standard or golden calf? J Clin Epidemiol 54:541–549
Kassirer JP, Kopelman RI (1989) Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences. Am J Med 86:433–441
Khan KS, Daya S, Collins JA, Walter SD (1996) Empirical evidence of bias in infertility research: overestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials using pregnancy as the outcome measure. Fertil Steril 65:939–945
Kiene H (1996a) A critique of the double-blind clinical trial. Part 1. Altern Ther Health Med 2:74–80
Kiene H (1996b) A critique of the double-blind clinical trial. Part 2. Altern Ther Health Med 2:59–64
Kirk-Smith MD, Stretch DD (2001) Evidence-based medicine and randomized double-blind clinical trials: a study of flawed implementation. J Eval Clin Pract 7:119–123
Kjaergard LL, Gluud C (2002) Citation bias of hepato-biliary randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 55:407–410
Koudstaal J, Bruinse HW, Helmerhorst FM, Vermeiden JP, Willemsen WN, Visser GH (2000) Obstetric outcome of twin pregnancies after in-vitro fertilization: a matched control study in four Dutch University hospitals. Hum Reprod 15: 935–940
LeLorier J, Gregoire G, Benhaddad A, Lapierre J, Derderian F (1997) Discrepancies between meta-analyses and subsequent large randomized, controlled trials. N Engl J Med 337:536–542
Miller FG, Shorr AF (2002) Ethical assessment of industry-sponsored clinical trials: a case analysis. Chest 121:1337–1342
Mitchell AA (2002) Infertility treatment-more risks and challenges. N Engl J Med 346:769–770
Neuwinger J, Behre HM, Nieschlag E (1990) External quality control in the andrology laboratory: an experimental multicenter trial. Fertil Steril 54:308–314
Nilsson S, Edvinsson A, Nilsson B (1979) Improvement of semen and pregnancy rate after ligation and division of the internal spermatic vein: fact or fiction? Br J Urol 51:591–596
Olive DL (1996) Evidence based medicine and the surgical procedure. Course on evidence based medicine: contemporary mode of practice. Am Soc Reprod Med 1–65
Schroder AK, Katalinic A, Diedrich K, Ludwig M (2004) Cumulative pregnancy rates and drop-out rates in a German IVF programme: 4102 cycles in 2130 patients. Reprod Biomed Online 8:600–606
Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002) Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what. Lancet 359:696–700
Smith R (1998) Beyond conflict of interest. Transparency is the key. BMJ 317:291–292
Steinberger E, Rodriguez-Rigau LJ, Smith KD (1981) The interaction between the fertility potentials of the two members of an infertile couple. In: Frajese G, Hafez ES, Conti C, Fabbrini A (eds) Oligozoospermia: recent progress in andrology. Raven, New York, pp 9–19
Stelfox HT, Chua G, O’Rourke K, Detsky AS (1998) Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. N Engl J Med 338:101–106
Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnstrom O, Koster M, Stjernqvist K (2002) Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population-based study. Lancet 359:461–465
Sutcliffe AG, Taylor B, Li J, Thornton S, Grudzinskas JG, Lieberman BA (1999) Children born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: population control study. Br Med J 318:704–705
Teris B. (ed) (1998) Recombinant FSH: a collection of previously published papers. Fertil Steril 69(Suppl 2)
Van Steirteghem A (1998) Outcome of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 338:194–195
Wennerholm U, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Lundin K, Nilsson L, Wikland M, Kallen B (2000) Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod 15: 944–948
WHO (1987) Towards more objectivity in diagnosis and management of male infertility. Int J Androl Suppl 7
Wilson AM (2002) Press communication. The Independent, 22 October 2002
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag France
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Comhaire, F., Mahmoud, A. (2008). Médecine basée sur les preuves en médecine de la reproduction et en andrologie. In: Schill, WB., Comhaire, F., Hargreave, T.B. (eds) Traité d’andrologie à l’usage des cliniciens. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-72080-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-72080-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Paris
Print ISBN: 978-2-287-72079-6
Online ISBN: 978-2-287-72080-2