Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biopsies guidées du sein: faut-il s’en méfier?

  • Conference paper
Cancer du sein

  • 272 Accesses

Abstrait

L’amélioration des techniques de prélèvements associée à la standardisation des indications conduit à l’optimisation de la prise en charge diagnostique et préthérapeutique des lésions mammaires. De vastes études multicentriques successives américaines et allemandes, concernant des milliers de prélèvements tant en microbiopsies qu’en macrobiopsies assistées par le vide, permettent de situer précisément la place de ces techniques dans le cadre d’une démarche de qualité en aval du dépistage organisé (1, 2). Néanmoins, les microbiopsies comme les macrobiopsies présentent des limites dont nous analyserons à travers les données de la littérature les causes et les conséquences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Parker SH, Burbank F, Jackman RJ et al. (1994) Percutaneous large-core breast biopsy: a multi-institutional study. Radiology 193: 359–364

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kettritz U, Rotter K, Schreer I et al. (2004) Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in 2874 patients. A multicenter study. Cancer 100: 245–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Darling MLR, Smith DN, Lester SC et al. (2000) Atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ as revealed by large-core needle breast biopsy: Results of surgical excision. Am J Roentgenol 175: 1341–1346

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Burbank F, Parker SH, Fogarty TJ (1996) Stereotactic breast biopsy: improved tissue harvesting with the mammotome. Am Surg 62: 738–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berg WA, Krebs TL, Campassi C et al. (1997) Evaluation of 14-and 11-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy probes and 14-gauge biopsy guns in a breast parenchymal model. Radiology 205: 203–208

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackman R, Burbank F, Parker SH et al. (2001) Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates. Radiology 218: 497–502

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Glassman JR et al. (1997) Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy. Radiology 203: 151–157

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Burbank F (1997) Mammographic findings after 14-gauge automated needle and 14-gauge directional, vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsies. Radiology 204: 153–156

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Liberman L, Kaplan JB, Morris EA et al. (2002) To excise or to sample the mammographic target: what is the goal of stereotactic 11-gauge vacuumassisted breast biopsy? Am J Roentgenol 179: 679–683

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soo MS, Baker JA, Rosen EL (2003) Sonographic detection and sonographically guided biopsy of breast microcalcifications. Am J Roentgenol 180: 941–948

    Google Scholar 

  11. Liberman L (2000) Percutaneous imaging-guided core breast biopsy: State of the Art at the Millennium. Am J Roentgenol 174: 1191–1199

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Liberman L, Smolkin JH, Dershaw DD et al. (1998) Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Radiology 208: 251–260

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Liberman L, Abramson AF (1996) Nondiagnostic stereotaxic core breast biopsy: results of rebiopsy. Radiology 198: 323–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Philpotts LE, Shaheen NA, Carter D, Lange RC, Lee CH (1999) Comparison of rebiopsy rates after stereotactic core needle biopsy of the breast with 11gauge vacuum suction probe versus 14-gauge needle and automatic gun. Am J Roentgenol 172: 683–687

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liberman L, Feng TL, Dershaw DD, Morris EA, Abramson AF (1998) USguided core breast biopsy: use and cost-effectiveness. Radiology 208: 717–723

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liberman L, Drotman M, Morris EA et al. (2000) Imaging-Histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy. Cancer 89: 2538–2545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackman RJ, Marzoni FA (1997) Needle-localized breast biopsy: why do we fail? Radiology 204: 677–684

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackman R, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J et al. (1999) Stereotactic automated large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 210: 799–805

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cherel P, Hagay Ch, De Maulmont Ch et al. (2002) Macrobiopsies mammaires par aspiration: problèmes posés au radiologue. Le Sein 12: 130–141

    Google Scholar 

  20. Goodman KA, Birdwell RL, Ikeda DM (1998) Compliance with recommanded follow-up after percutaneous breast core biopsy. Am J Roentgenol 170: 89–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liberman L, Benton CL, Dershaw DD et al. (2001) Learning curve for stereotactic breast biopsy: How many cases are enough. Am J Roentgenol 176: 721–727

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pfarl G, Helbich TH, Riedl CC et al. (2002) Stereotatic 11 — Gauge Vacuumassisted breast biopsy: a validation study. Am J Roentgenol 179: 1503–1507

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sebag P, Tourasse C, Rouyer N et al. (2006) Value of vacuum assisted biopsies under sonography guidance: results from a multicentric study of 650 lesions. J Radiol 87: 29–34

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cassano E, Urban LABD, Pizzamiglio M et al. (2006) Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted core breast biopsy: experience with 406 cases. Breast Cancer Res Treat 13

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grady I, Gorsuch H, Wilburn-Bailey S (2005) Ultrasound-guided, vacuumassisted, percutaneous excision of breast lesions: an accurate technique in the diagnosis of atypical ductal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Surg 201: 14–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA et al. (1993) US-guided automated largecore breast biopsy. Radiology 187: 507–511

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith DN, Rosenfield Darling ML, Meyer JE et al. (2001) The utility of ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy: results from 500 consecutive breast biopsies. J Ultrasound Med 20: 43–49

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Crystal P, Koretz M, Shcharynsky S et al. (2005) Accuracy of sonographically guided 14-gauge core-needle biopsy: results of 715 consecutive breast biopsies with at least two-year follow-up of benign lesions. J Clin Ultrasound 33: 47–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schoonjans JM, Brem RF (2001) Fourteen-gauge ultrasonographically guided large-core needle biopsy of breast masses. J Ultrasound Med 20: 967–672

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bucherberger W, Niehoff A, Obrist P et al. (2002) Sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast: technique, accuracy and indications. Radiology 42: 25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cho N, Moon WK, Cha JH et al. (2005) Sonographically guided core biopsy of the breast: comparison of 14-gauge automated gun and 11-gauge directional vacuum-assisted biopsy methods. Korean J Radiol 6: 102–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Cherel P, Hagay C, Becette V et al. (2005) Lésions mammaires avec histologie bénigne après biopsie stéréotaxique sur table dédiée numérisée: Une surveillance ? Laquelle ? SOFMIS Versailles, 3–4 juin 2005. Ed. Bialec Nancy: 301–321

    Google Scholar 

  33. Plantade R, Hammou JC, Gerard F et al. (2005) Ultrasound-guided vacuumassisted biopsy: review of 382 cases. J Radiol 86: 1003–1015

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Carpentier E, Maruani A, Michenet P et al. (2005) Can US-guided vacuumassisted biopsies be an alternative to diagnostic surgery in cases of non-diagnostic core needle biopsy? J Radiol 86: 475–480

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Plantade R, Gerard F, Hammou JC (2006) Les tumeurs papillaires non malignes du sein: quelle prise en charge après diagnostic percutané ? J Radiol 87: 299–305

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Balu-Maestro C, Chapellier C, Carrier P et al. (2005) Imagerie dans le bilan d’extension ganglionnaire et métastatique du cancer du sein. J Radiol 86: 1649–1657

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Duchesne N, Jaffey J, Florack P et al. (2005) Redefining ultrasound appearance criteria of positive axillary lymph nodes. Can Assoc Radiol J 56: 289–296

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de radiodiagnostic, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice cedex 02

    C. Balu-Maestro & C. Chapellier

  2. Service d’anatomopathologie, Centre Antoine-Lacassagne, 33, avenue de Valombrose, 06189, Nice cedex 02

    F. Ettore & I. Peyrottes

Authors
  1. C. Balu-Maestro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. Ettore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Chapellier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Peyrottes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this paper

Cite this paper

Balu-Maestro, C., Ettore, F., Chapellier, C., Peyrottes, I. (2007). Biopsies guidées du sein: faut-il s’en méfier?. In: Cancer du sein. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71478-8_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-71477-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-71478-8

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation