Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multidisciplinarité

  • Chapter
Chirurgie oncoplastique et reconstruction dans le cancer du sein

  • 413 Accesses

Abstrait

Les techniques de chirurgie esthétique deviennent de plus en plus sophistiquées et l’exigence de patientes traitées pour un cancer du sein également. Parfois, la patiente exige une reconstruction immédiate de son chirurgien. En même temps, dans la dernière édition des « Standards, Options & Recommandations (SOR) du traitement des cancers du sein infiltrants non métastatiques » il a été décrété que « le choix d’une reconstruction mammaire immédiate ne doit pas compromettre la réalisation optimale d’une radiothérapie locorégionale et d’un traitement général « (1). Quand le traitement local nécessite une mastectomie totale et que la patiente souhaite une reconstruction mammaire immédiate (RMI), une concertation multidisciplinaire préalable est indispensable pour évaluer la néces sité d’une radiothérapie et l’interférence éventuelle avec une reconstruction en fonction de la technique choisie.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. (2001) Standards, Options & Recommandations (SOR) du traitement des cancers du sein infiltrants non métastatiques. Radiothérapie 138–57. John Libbey Eurotext, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  2. Contant CM, van Geel AN, van der Holt B, et al. (2000) Morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy by subpectorally placed silicone prosthesis: the adverse effect of radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 26: 344–50

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chu FCH, Kaufmann TP, Dawson GA, et al. (1992) Radiation therapy of cancer in prosthetically augmented or reconstructed breasts. Radiology 185: 429–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Klein EE, Kuske RR (1993) Changes in photon dose distribution due to breast prostheses. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25: 541–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Faucher A, Dihuydy JM, Etcheberry TG, et al. (1998) Reconstruction mammaire prothétique et radiothérapie: analyse de 67 cas. Bull Cancer 85: 167–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kirova Y, Campana F, Fournier-Bidoz N, et al. (2007) Radiothérapie pour qui et comment? In: Morère JF ed. Cancer du sein. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kirova YM, Servois V, Campana F, et al. (2006) CT-scan based localization of the internal mammary chain and supra clavicular nodes for breast cancer radiation therapy planning. Radiother Oncol 79: 310–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. ICRU. Report 50 (1993) Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Washington DC: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements

    Google Scholar 

  9. ICRU. Report 62: (supplement to ICRU Report 50) (1999) Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy. Bethesda, MD: International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fourquet A, Rosenwald JC, Campana F, et al. (2000) Radiotherapy of cancer of the breast. Technical problems and new approaches. Cancer Radiother Suppl 1: 180s–186s

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ringberg A, Tengrup I, Aspegren K, et al. (1999) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 25: 470–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. (2001) Complications and patients satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49: 713–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dian D, Schwenn K, Mylonas I, et al. (2007) Aesthetic result among breast cancer patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction versus breast conserving therapy. Arch Gynecol Obstet [Ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

Références

  1. Punglia RS, Morrow M, Winer EP, et al. (2007) Local therapy and survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356: 2399–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (2005) Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 365: 1687–717

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Colozza M, de Azambuja E, Cardoso F, et al. (2006) Breast cancer: achievements in adjuvant systemic therapies in the pre-genomic era. Oncologist 11: 111–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor CW, Horgan K, Dodwell D (2005) Oncological aspects of breast reconstruction. Breast 14: 118–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Azuar P (2007) Oncoplastic surgery in breast cancer: indications and results. Presse Med 36: 341–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Yule GJ, Concannon MJ, Croll G, et al. (1996) Is there liability with chemotherapy following immediate breast construction? Plast Reconstr Surg 97: 969–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Munhoz AM, Montag E, Fels KW, et al. (2005) Outcome analysis of breast-conservation surgery and immediate latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction in patients with T1 to T2 breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 116: 741–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mortenson MM, Schneider PD, Khatri VP, et al. (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy increases wound complications: however, initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy is not delayed. Arch Surg 139: 988–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rey P, Martinelli G, Petit JY, et al. (2005) Immediate breast reconstruction and high-dose chemotherapy. Ann Plast Surg 55: 250–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Allweis TM, Boisvert ME, Otero SE, et al. (2002) Immediate reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer does not prolong the time to starting adjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg 183: 218–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Taylor CW, Kumar S (2005) The effect of immediate breast reconstruction on adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast 14: 18–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson CR, Brown IM, Weiller-Mithoff E, et al. (2004) Immediate breast reconstruction does not lead to a delay in the delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 30: 624–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gouy S, Rouzier R, Missana MC, et al. (2005) Immediate reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: effect on adjuvant treatment starting and survival. Ann Surg Oncol 12: 161–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Colleoni M, Bonetti M, Coates AS, et al. (2000) Early start of adjuvant chemotherapy may improve treatment outcome for premenopausal breast cancer patients with tumors not expressing estrogen receptors. The International Breast Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18: 584–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shannon C, Ashley S, Smith IE (2003) Does timing of adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer influence survival? J Clin Oncol 21: 3792–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jara Sanchez C, Ruiz A, Martin M, et al. (2007) Influence of timing of initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy over survival in breast cancer: a negative outcome study by the Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Breast Cancer Res Treat 101: 215–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cold S, During M, Ewertz M, et al. (2005) Does timing of adjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis after early breast cancer? Results of the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group (DBCG). Br J Cancer 93: 627–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lohrisch C, Paltiel C, Gelmon K, et al. (2006) Impact on survival of time from definitive surgery to initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24: 4888–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mauri D, Pavlidis N, Ioannidis JP (2005) Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant systemic treatment in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 188–94

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaufmann M, Hortobagyi GN, Goldhirsch A, et al. (2006) Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol 24: 1940–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones RL, Smith IE (2006) Neoadjuvant treatment for early-stage breast cancer: opportunities to assess tumour response. Lancet Oncol 7: 869–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Loibl S, von Minckwitz G, Raab G, et al. (2006) Surgical procedures after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: results of the GEPARDUO trial. Ann Surg Oncol 13: 1434–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Clough KB, Lewis JS, Couturaud B, et al. (2003) Oncoplastic techniques allow extensive resections for breast-conserving therapy of breast carcinomas. Ann Surg 237: 26–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Oh JL, Bonnen M, Outlaw ED, et al. (2006) The impact of young age on locoregional recurrence after doxorubicin-based breast conservation therapy in patients 40 years old or younger: How young is “young”? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65: 1345–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ring A, Webb A, Ashley S, et al. (2003) Is surgery necessary after complete clinical remission following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer? J Clin Oncol 21: 4540–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Deutsch MF, Smith M, Wang B, et al. (1999) Immediate breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Plast Surg 42: 240–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, et al. (2006) Complications after microvascular breast reconstruction: experience with 1195 flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 118: 1100–9; discussion 1110-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Deutsch M, Flickinger JC (2003) Patient characteristics and treatment factors affecting cosmesis following lumpectomy and breast irradiation. Am J Clin Oncol 26: 350–3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Caine GJ, Stonelake PS, Rea D (2003) Coagulopathic complications in breast cancer. Cancer 98: 1578–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J, et al. (2005) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353: 1673–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith I, Procter M, Gelber RD, et al. (2007) 2-year follow-up of trastuzumab after adjuvant chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 369: 29–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Tagliabue E, Agresti R, Carcangiu ML, et al. (2003) Role of HER2 in wound-induced breast carcinoma proliferation. Lancet 362: 527–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Coudert BP, Largillier R, Arnould L, et al. (2007) Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant therapy with trastuzumab, docetaxel, and carboplatin for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-overexpressing stage II or III breast cancer: results of the GETN(A)-1 trial. J Clin Oncol 25: 2678–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Buzdar AU, Valero V, Ibrahim NK, et al. (2007) Neoadjuvant therapy with paclitaxel followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy and concurrent trastuzumab in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive operable breast cancer: an update of the initial randomized study population and data of additional patients treated with the same regimen. Clin Cancer Res 13: 228–33

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Miller KD, Sledge GW, Burstein HJ (2007) Angiogenesis inhibition in the treatment of breast cancer: a review of studies presented at the 2006 san antonio breast cancer symposium. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 5: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Eskens FA, Verweij J (2006) The clinical toxicity profile of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) targeting angiogenesis inhibitors; a review. Eur J Cancer 42: 3127–39

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Références

  1. Ganz PA, Desmond KA, Leedham B, et al. (2002) Quality of life in long-term, disease-free survivors of breast cancer: a follow-up study. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 39–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ganz PA, Coscarelli A, Fred C, et al. (1996) Breast cancer survivors: psychosocial concerns and quality of life. Breast Cancer Res Treat 38: 183–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al. (2005) Populationbased study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res 14: 1467–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lehmann A (2007) Incidences psychologiques de la chirurgie du sein. In: JY Petit et al. Le cancer du sein, chirurgie diagnostique, curative et reconstructrice. 2e éd (mise à jour). Arnette, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kornblith A, Ligibel J (2003) Psychosocial and sexual functioning of survivors of breast cancer. Semin Oncol 30: 799–813

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Boussard V, Capuano A, Borde-Müller G (2006) Les difficultés psychologiques liées à la chirurgie mammaire. Référentiels de l’Institut Curie

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schover LR (2004) Myth-busters: telling the true story of breast cancer survivorship. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 1800–1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganz PA, Kwan L, Stanton AL, et al. (2004) Quality of life at the end of primary treatment of breast cancer: first results from the moving beyond cancer randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 376–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hopwood P, Haviland J, Mills J, et al. (2007) The impact of age and clinical factors on quality of life in early breast cancer: An analysis of 2208 women recruited to the UK START Trial (Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy Trial). Breast 16: 241–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Al-Ghazal SK, Sully L, Fallowfield L, et al. (2000) The psychological impact of immediate rather than delayed breast reconstruction. Eur J Surg Oncol 26: 17–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brédart A, Petit JY (2005) Partial mastectomy: a balance between oncology and aesthetics. Lancet Oncol 6: 130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ananian P, Houvenaeghel G, Protière C, et al. (2004) Determinants of patients’ choice of reconstruction with mastectomy for primary breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 11: 762–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Reaby LL (1998) Breast restoration decision making: enhancing the process. Cancer Nurs 21: 196–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harcourt D, Rumsey N (2004) Mastectomy patients’ decisionmaking for or against immediate breast reconstruction. Psycho-oncology 13: 106–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW (2000) Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 36: 1938–43

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Björklund T, et al. (2005) Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 14: 201–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roth RS, Lowery JC, Davis J, et al. (2005) Quality of life and affective distress in women seeking immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 116: 993–1002

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Saulis AS, Mustoe TA, Fine NA (2007) A retrospective analysis of patient satisfaction with immediate postmastectomy breast reconstruction: comparison of three common procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg 119: 1669–76; discussion 1677-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris TN (2006) Breast reconstruction following subcutaneous mastectomy for cancer: a critical appraisal of the nipple-areola complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 117: 1083–90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kraus PL (1999) Body image, decision making, and breast cancer treatment. Cancer Nurs 22: 421–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, et al. (2000) Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Instit 92: 1422–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fobair P, Stewart SL, Chang S, et al. (2006) Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 15: 579–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Roth RS, Lowery JC, Davis J, Wilkins EG (2007) Psychological factors predict patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 119: 2008–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, et al. (2000) Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 769–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al. (2000) Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: one-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106: 1014–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, et al. (2007) Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg 204: 7–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T (1997) Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 44: 681–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lostumbo L, Carbine N, Wallace J, et al. (2004) Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4):CD002748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bresser PJ, Seynaeve C, Van Gool AR, et al. (2006) Satisfaction with prophylactic mastectomy and breast reconstruction in genetically predisposed women. Plast Reconstr Surg 117: 1675–882

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lodder LN, Frets PG, Trijsburg RW, et al. (2002) One year follow-up of women opting for presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: emotional impact of the test outcome and decisions on risk management (surveillance or prophylactic surgery). Breast Cancer Res Treat 73: 97–112

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hopwood P, Lee A, Shenton A, et al. (2000) Clinical follow-up after bilateral risk reducing (‘prophylactic’) mastectomy: mental health and body image outcomes. Psycho-oncology 9: 462–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Metcalfe KA, Esplen MJ, Goel V, et al. (2004a) Psychosocial functioning in women who have undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. Psycho-oncology 13: 14–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Metcalfe KA, Semple JL, Narod SA (2004b) Satisfaction with breast reconstruction in women with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: a descriptive study. Plast Reconstr Surg 114: 360–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Neill KM, Armstrong N, Burnett CB (1998) Choosing reconstruction after mastectomy: a qualitative analysis. Oncol Nurs Forum 25: 743–50

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 365–76

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Brédart A, Razavi D, Robertson C, et al. (2001) A Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care: Internal consistency and validity testing across oncology settings from France, Italy, Poland and Sweden. Pat Educ Counsel 43: 243–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dugan W, Mac Donald M, Passik SD, et al. (1998) Use of the zung self-rating depression scale in cancer patients: feasibility as a screening tool. Psycho-oncology 7: 483–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Brédart A, Verdier Swaine A, Dolbeault S (2007) Traduction/adaptation française de l’échelle “Body Image Scale” (BIS) évaluant la perception de l’image du corps chez des femmes atteintes de cancer du sein. Psycho-Oncologie 1: 24–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sepucha K, Ozanne E, Silvia K, et al. (2007) An approach to measuring the quality of breast cancer decisions. Patient Educ Couns 65: 261–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wolf L (2004) The information needs of women who have undergone breast reconstruction. Part I: decision-making and sources of information. Eur J Oncol Nurs 8: 211–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lalloo F, Baildam A, Brain A, et al. (2000) A protocol for preventative mastectomy in women with an increased lifetime risk of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 26: 711–3

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Morris T (1980) Postoperative adjustment of patients with breast cancer. J R Soc Med 73: 215–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2008). Multidisciplinarité. In: Chirurgie oncoplastique et reconstruction dans le cancer du sein. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71476-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-2-287-71476-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-71475-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-71476-4

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation