The History of Meteorology: to 1800 pp 123-143 | Cite as

# The End and the Beginning

- 29 Downloads

## Abstract

The pattern of investigation evolved in the development of the pressure-height problem became the model for much of later meteorological development, including dynamic meteorology. In this pattern, the first step was the discovery of a basic atmospheric property. Next, attempts were made to establish a mathematical relationship between two or more of the involved variables. The last step was to express mathematically the corrections to the basic relationship, which had been empirically discovered. This method became the basis of dynamic meteorological development in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.^{1}

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.A classic in the attempts to express the motions of the earth’s atmosphere in the form of mathematical equations was L.F. Richardson,
*Weather Prediction by Numerical Process*(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1922).Google Scholar - 2.Edmund Halley, “An Historical Account of the Trade Winds and Monsoons, Observable in the Seas between and near the Tropics; with an Attempt to Assign their Physical Cause,”
*Phil. Trans.*16 (1686): 153–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 3.Napier Shaw,
*Manual of Meteorology*(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1926), 1:258.Google Scholar - 4.Charles Singer,
*A Short History of Scientific Ideas to**1900*(Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1959), p. 321.Google Scholar - 5.Shaw,
*Manual*, p. 122.Google Scholar - 6.George Hadley, “Concerning the Cause of the General Trade Winds,”
*Phil. Trans.*34 (1735): 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 7.Julius Von Hann,
*Lehrbuch Der Meteorologie*, 4th ed., (Lepizig: Henn. Tauchnitz, 1926), p. 437.Google Scholar - 8.For example, see William L. Donn,
*Meteorology with Marine Applications*(New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., Inc., 1946), p. 149.Google Scholar - 9.See W.W. Kellogg, “Report on Symposium on Meteorological Rockets,”
*Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Rocket and Satellite Meteorology*(New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1963), pp. 9–14.Google Scholar - 10.Paul H. Fuss,
*Correspondance Mathematique et Physical De Quelques Célèbres Géomètres Du XVII erne Siecle*(St. Petersburg: 1843), 1: 368–372.Google Scholar - 11.Cleveland Abbe, trans.,
*The Mechanics of the Earth’s Atmosphere*, 3rd collection (Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1910), p. 1.Google Scholar - 12.Jean Le D’Alembert,
*Reflex ions sur La Cause Generale Des Vents*(Berlin: 1747).Google Scholar - 13.Cleveland Abbe, “The Progress of Science as Illustrated by the Development of Meteorology,”
*Smithsonian Institution Annual Report*(1907): 299.Google Scholar - 14.See Seymore L. Hess,
*Introduction to Theoretical Meteorology*(New York: Henry Holt and Company, 1959), p. 215.Google Scholar - 15.Coriolis force is named after a French mathematican G.G. deCoriolis (1792–1843). He published his work on the effect of the earth’s rotation in 1835. There is some question as to the appropriateness of assigning Coriolis’ name to this deflecting force. See H.E. Landsberg, “Why indeed Coriolis?,” and Harold L. Burstyn, “The deflecting force and Coriolis,”
*Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society*47, No. 11 (November 1966): 887–891.Google Scholar - 16.For a discussion of the historical development of this law in the nineteenth century, see Florian Cajori,
*A History of Physics*(New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 1962), pp. 218–223.Google Scholar - 17.
*Ibid*, p. 206.Google Scholar - 18.
*Ibid.*Google Scholar - 19.Sir William Dampier.
*A History of Science*(New York: The Macmillan Company, 1935), p. 229.Google Scholar - 20.Morris Kline,
*Mathematical Thought*from*Ancient to Modern Times*(New York: Oxford University Press, 1972), pp. 165–166.Google Scholar - 21.Blaise Pascal,
*The Physical Treatise of Pascal*, trans. I.H.B. and A.G.H. Spiers (New York: Columbia University Press, 1937), pp. 156–292.Google Scholar - 22.W.E. Knowles Middleton,
*The History of the Barometer*(Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1964), p. 53.Google Scholar - 23.Pierre Simon Laplace,
*Mécanique Célest*, trans. Nathaniel Bowditch (Boston: Hillard, Gray, Little and Wilkins, 1829–39), 4:478. The original work was published in parts from 1798 to 1825.Google Scholar - 24.
*Ibid.*, p. 565. For a discussion of Laplace’s pressure-height equation see H. Howard Frisinger, “Mathematicians in the History of Meteorology: The Pressure-Height Problem,”*Historia Mathematica.*Google Scholar - 25.
*Ibid.*, p. 478.Google Scholar - 26.E.T. Bell,
*Men of Mathematics*(New York: Simon and Schuster, 1962), p. 174.Google Scholar - 27.Sir William Napier Shaw,
*Manual of Meteorology*(Cambridge: The University Press, 1926), 1:130.Google Scholar - 28.Harvey A. Zinszer, “Meteorological Mileposts,”
*Scientific Monthly*, 58 (1944): 262.Google Scholar - 29.For a complete discussion on the works and methods of Archimedes, see T.L. Heath(ed.),
*The Works of Archimedes*(New York: Dover Publications, Inc.)Google Scholar - 30.Charles Singer,
*A Short History of Scientific Ideas to**1900*(London: Oxford University Press, 1959), pp. 223–224.Google Scholar - 31.Rene Dugas,
*A History of Mechanics*, trans. J.R. Maddox (Switzerland: Editions Du Griffon, 1955), pp. 124–127.Google Scholar - 32.Galilei Galileo,
*Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences*, trans. Henry Crew and Alfonso DeSalvio (Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1939), pp. 64–68.Google Scholar - 33.
*Ibid.*, p. 265.Google Scholar - 34.
*Ibid.*, p. 244.Google Scholar - 35.
*Ibid.*, p. 250.Google Scholar - 36.See Rene Duga,
*op. cit.*, pp. 172–199.Google Scholar - 37.Isaac Newton,
*Philosophial Naturalis Principia Mathematica*, 3rd ed., trans. Andrew Motte, ed. Florian Cajori (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1946).Google Scholar - 38.See Carl B. Boyer,
*The History of the Calculus and Its Conceptual Development*(New York: Dover Publications, Inc. 1959), pp. 187–223.Google Scholar - 39.For a thorough discussion of the development of partial differential equations in the eighteenth century see Morris Kline,
*op. cit.*, pp. 502–543.Google Scholar - 40.Leonhard Euler,
*Die Gesetze des Gleichgewichts and der Bewegung Flussiger Korper*, trans. H.W. Brandes (Leipzig: 1806), pp. 53–86.Google Scholar - 41.Leonhard Euler,
*Letters of Euler on Different Subjects in Natural Philosophy Addressed to a German Princess*, trans. David Brewster, 2 vols. (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1872). Throughout this collection of letters by Euler are comments on several meteorological phenomena, and properties of the atmosphere. In letters X, XI, and XII, written in May 1760, Euler summarizes the then known knowledge of the rarefaction and elasticity of the air, of gravity, and of the barometer, in the letters XXXVI-XXXIX, written in August 1761, the author presents the theories on thunder and lightning, held by the ancient philosophers, and Descartes’s theory. Due to their lack of knowledge of electricity, these previous theories were “a mass of absurdity.” According to Euler, the stormy clouds are extremely electrical, and thunder and lightning are the result of a huge electrical spark set off by these clouds.Google Scholar - 42.Leonhard Euler, “General Principles of the Motion of Fluids,”
*Hist. de l’A cad. de Berlin**11*(1755): 274–315.Google Scholar - 43.Singer,
*op. cit.*, pp. 332–333.Google Scholar - 44.Kline,
*op. cit.*, p. 541.Google Scholar - 45.It should be noted that Euler’s equations are not the final ones for hydrodynamics. He neglected viscosity which was not introduced until 70 years later by Navier and Stokes. See Kline,
*op. cit.*, pp. 696–698.Google Scholar