Skip to main content

Abstract

Anyone involved with diffusion calculations becomes well aware of the strong dependence of maximum ground concentrations on the “effective stack height,” he. For most conditions χmax is approximately proportional to he−2, as has been recognized at least since 1936 (Bosanquet and Pearson). Making allowance for the gradual decrease in the ratio of vertical to lateral diffusion at increasing heights, the exponent is slightly larger, say χmax~ he−2.3. In inversion breakup fumigation, the exponent issomewhat smaller; very crudely, χmax~ he−1.5 In any case, for an elevated emission the dependence of χmax on he is substantial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Hanna, S. R. (1972): Rise and condensation of cooling tower plumes, J. Appl. Meteor. 11, 793–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S. R. (1974): Meteorological effects of the mechanical draft cooling towers of the Oak Ridge Gaseous Diffusion Plant, Cooling Tower Environment-1974 (see under Hanna and Pell, coordinators).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, S. R. and J. Pell, coordinators (1974): Cooling Tower Environment-1974, CON.-74032, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. 22161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, M. L. et. al. (1975): John E. Amos Cooling Tower Flight Program Data: December 1974-March 1975, prepared for American Electric Power Service Corp., P.O. 487, Canton, Ohio 44701 by Smith-Singer Meteorologists, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, B. J. (1957): The Physics of Clouds, Oxford University Press, London.McVehil, G. E. and K. E. Heikes ( 1975 ): Cooling Tower Plume Modeling and Drift Deposition Measurement, prepared for the ASME by Ball Brother Research Corp., Boulder, Colo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. H., T. W. Eagles, L. C. Kohlenstein, J. A. Kagan, and W. D. Stanbro (1974): Mechanical draft cooling tower visible plume behavior: measurements, models, predictions. Cooling Tower Environment-1974 (see under Hanna and Pell, coordinators).

    Google Scholar 

  • Overcamp, T. J. and D. P. Hoult (1971): Precipitation in the wake of cooling towers. Atmos. Environ. 5, 751–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherlock, R. H. and E. A. Stalker (1941): A study of flow phenomena in the wake of smoke stacks. Engineering Research Bulletin 29, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, J. (1974): The rise of moist, buoyant plumes. J. Appl. Meteor. 13, 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L. (1975a): Condensation in jets, industrial plumes and cooling tower plumes. J. Appl. Meteor. 14, 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T. M. L. (1975b): A numerical analysis of the effect of condensation on plume rise. J. Appl. Meteor. 14, 1105–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1982 American Meteorological Society

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Briggs, G.A. (1982). Plume Rise Predictions. In: Lectures on Air Pollution and Environmental Impact Analyses. American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-23-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-935704-23-2_3

  • Publisher Name: American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-935704-23-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics