Skip to main content

Ultrasound imaging in rheumatoid arthritis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Abstract

Detailed physical examination alone can fail to provide a correct diagnosis in patients with painful articular or abarticular manifestations, particularly in those with recent disease onset. In these cases, rheumatologists may need further support to look for joint or tendon involvement and suitably objective imaging technique available in everyday practice that can assist with diagnosing joint involvement has long been awaited. Ultrasound (US) is an easy and accessible imaging technique that can visualize soft tissues and cortical bone defects [1,2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grassi W, Salaffi F, Filippucci E. Ultrasound in rheumatology. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2005;19:467-485.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D’Agostino MA, Breban M. Ultrasonography in inflammatory joint disease: why should rheumatologists pay attention? Joint Bone Spine. 2002;69:252-255.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conaghan PG, Ostergaard M, D’Agostino MA, et al. Proceedings from the 5th Annual International Society for Musculoskeletal Imaging in Rheumatology Annual Conference. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2013;42:433-446.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colebatch AN, Edwards CJ, Ostergaard M, et al. EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging of the joints in the clinical management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:804-814.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Agostino MA, Ayral X, Baron G, Ravaud P, Breban M, Dougados M. Impact of ultrasound imaging on local corticosteroid injections of symptomatic ankle, hind-, and mid-foot in chronic inflammatory diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53:284-292.

    Google Scholar 

  6. D’Agostino MA, Schmidt WA. Ultrasound-guided injections in rheumatology: actual knowledge on efficacy and procedures. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:283-294.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wakefield RJ, D’Agostino MA, Iagnocco A, et al. The OMERACT Ultrasound Group: status of current activities and research directions. J Rheumatol. 2007;34:848-51.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Iagnocco A, et al. The OMERACT ultrasound task force–status and perspectives. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2063-2067.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D’Agostino MA, Conaghan PG, Naredo E, et al. The OMERACT ultrasound task force – advances and priorities. J Rheumatol. 2009;36:1829-1832.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2485-2487.

    Google Scholar 

  11. D’Agostino MA, Filippucci, E Backhaus, et al. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of ultrasonography for detecting and scoring synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a report of a EULAR ESCISIT Task Force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(suppl III):62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. D’Agostino MA, Backhaus M, Balint PV, et al. Combined evaluation of influence of sonographer and machine type on the reliability of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) for detecting, scoring and scanning synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients: results of an intermachine reliability exercise of the EULAR/OMERACT US group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(suppl 2):421.

    Google Scholar 

  13. D’Agostino MA, Backhaus M, Balint PV, et al. Evaluation of the intra- and inter-reader reliability of power Doppler ultrasonography (PDUS) for detecting and scoring synovitis of several joints in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by using a validated scoring system : a report of a the EULAR/OMERACT US group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67(suppl 2):422.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Naredo E, D’Agostino MA, Wakefield RJ, et al. Reliability of a consensus-based ultrasound score for tenosynovitis in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1328-1334.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Naredo E, Moller I, Moragues C, et al. Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a “Teach the Teachers” rheumatologist course. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:14-19.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bruyn GA, Moller I, Garrido J, et al. Reliability testing of tendon disease using two different scanning methods in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51:1655-1661.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bruyn GA, Naredo E, Moller I, et al. Reliability of ultrasonography in detecting shoulder disease in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:357-361.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bruyn GA, Pineda C, Hernandez-Diaz C, et al. Validity of ultrasonography and measures of adult shoulder function and reliability of ultrasonography in detecting shoulder synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging as a gold standard. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010;62:1079-1086.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Naredo E, D’Agostino MA, Conaghan PG, et al. Current state of musculoskeletal ultrasound training and implementation in Europe: results of a survey of experts and scientific societies. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:2438-2443.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Backhaus M, Kamradt T, Sandrock D, et al. Arthritis of the finger joints: a comprehensive approach comparing conventional radiography, scintigraphy, ultrasound, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 1999;42:1232-1245.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M. Contrastenhanced power Doppler ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:163-168.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Strandberg C, Klarlund M, Klausen T, Ostergaard M. Power Doppler ultrasonography for assessment of synovitis in the metacarpophalangeal joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:2018-2023.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wakefield RJ, Freeston JE, O’Connor P, et al. The optimal assessment of the rheumatoid arthritis hindfoot: a comparative study of clinical examination, ultrasound and high field MRI. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1678-1682.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, et al. Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:116-124.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Perricone C, Ceccarelli F, Modesti M, et al. The 6-joint ultrasonographic assessment: a valid, sensitive-to-change and feasible method for evaluating joint inflammation in RA. Rheumatology (Oxford).2013;51:866-873.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, et al. An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2958-2967.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:2762-2770.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R52.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ostergaard M, Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, McQueen FM. Ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in early rheumatoid arthritis: recent advances. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006;8:378-385.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Court-Payen M, et al. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R110.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lillegraven S, Boyesen P, Hammer HB, et al. Tenosynovitis of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon predicts erosive progression in early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:2049-2050.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Filippucci E, da Luz KR, Di Geso L, et al. Interobserver reliability of ultrasonography in the assessment of cartilage damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1845-1848.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Filer A, de Pablo P, Allen G, et al. Utility of ultrasound joint counts in the prediction of rheumatoid arthritis in patients with very early synovitis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:500-507.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Funck-Brentano T, Gandjbakhch F, Etchepare F, et al. Prediction of radiographic damage in early arthritis by sonographic erosions and power Doppler signal: a longitudinal observational study. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2013;65:896-902.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Salaffi F, Ciapetti A, Gasparini S, et al. Comparison of the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability questionnaire with the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28:855-865.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor PC, Steuer A, Gruber J, et al. Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1107-1116.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Naredo E, Rodriguez M, Campos C, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:515-522.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Naredo E, Moller I, Cruz A, Carmona L, Garrido J. Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2248-2256.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Iagnocco A, Filippucci E, Perella C, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic monitoring of response to adalimumab treatment in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2008;35:35-40.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1194-1201.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dougados M, Jousse-Joulin S, Mistretta F, et al. Evaluation of several ultrasonography scoring systems for synovitis and comparison to clinical examination: results from a prospective multicentre study of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:828-833.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wakefield RJ, D’Agostino MA, Naredo E, et al. After treat-to-target: can a targeted ultrasound initiative improve RA outcomes? Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71:799-803.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Healthcare

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Agostino, M.A. (2015). Ultrasound imaging in rheumatoid arthritis. In: Emery, P. (eds) Atlas of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Springer Healthcare, Tarporley. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-907673-91-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-907673-91-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Healthcare, Tarporley

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-907673-90-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-907673-91-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics