Skip to main content

Distributed Cognition in Engineering Design: Negotiating between Abstract and Material Representations

  • Chapter
Design Representation

Abstract

Recent writings on cognition have focused on the contribution of external representations in supporting internal thought processes. External representations have been found to be so instrumental to thought that cognition is described as “distributed.” “Distributed cognition” refers to the way that cognitive achievements arise from not only the internal thought processes of people, but also from the external representations such as the material systems, sketches and information technologies with which they work. The term “distributed” also refers to the fact that thinking processes may be distributed among members of a social group. This chapter focuses on how material representations — prototypes and bits of hardware — are instrumental to thinking in engineering design. In the closing discussion, extensions to other fields of design are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brereton, MF 1998. The role of hardware in learning engineering fundamentals. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, MF, DM Cannon, A Mabogunje, and L Leifer 1996. Collaboration in engineering design teams: How social interaction shapes the product. In Analyzing design activity, edited by N Cross, H Christiaans, and K Dorst. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, pp 319–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brereton, MF and LJ Leifer 1997. The role of hardware, context and noise in learning engineering fundamentals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design Volume 2. Edited by A Riitahuhta. Tampere, Finland, pp. 591–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownai, JS, A Collins, and P Duguid 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18(1):32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaiklin, S and J Lave 1993. Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P 2001. Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, C 1995. Seeing in depth. Social Studies of Science 25:237–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, S and S Minneman 1996. A bike in hand: A study of 3D objects in design. In Analyzing design activity, edited by N Cross, H Christiaans, and K Dorst. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage, J 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge, NY: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, B and A Henderson 1995. Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 4(1):39–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macann, C 1993. Four phenomenological philosophers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, CM 1995. So can you build one? Learning through designing: Connecting theory with hardware in engineering education. PhD thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, LC 1990. Vygotsky and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, C 1933. Collected papers, Vol 2. Edited by C Hartshorne and P Weiss. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, DA 1983. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • -1994. Designing as a reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation. In Research in Engineering Design. Volume 3. New York: Springer Verlag, pp 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • -1990. The design process. In Varieties of thinking, edited by VA Howard. London: Routledge, pp 100–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, A 1932. The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, L 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brereton, M. (2004). Distributed Cognition in Engineering Design: Negotiating between Abstract and Material Representations. In: Goldschmidt, G., Porter, W.L. (eds) Design Representation. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-85233-863-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-85233-863-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-753-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-85233-863-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics