Evaluation of Supply Process Improvements Illustrated by Means of a JIS Supply Process from the Automotive Industry

  • Gerald ReinerEmail author
  • Martin Poiger
Conference paper


In this study, we show that some of the core aspects of supply chain management are not taken into account sufficiently by traditional evaluation systems. In particular, the functional separation of cost centers, which belong to the supply process, causes problems for evaluating supply chain improvements. We build up an evaluation model supported by process simulation to overcome these problems. This model is applied to an example from the automotive industry. We assess the effect of distance reduction and transport scheduling (frequency) within a just-in-sequence (JIS) supply process and we show effects of moving the customer order decoupling point (CODP).


Supply Chain Assembly Line Supply Chain Management Forecast Accuracy Customer Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bertrand, J., Fransoo, J.: Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. International Journal of operations and production management 22(2), 241–264 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper, R., Kaplan, R.: Profit priorities from activity-based costing. Harvard Business Review 69(3), 130–135 (1991)Google Scholar
  3. Corswant, F., Fredriksson, P.: Sourcing trends in the car industry: a survey of car manufacturers’ and suppliers’ strategies and relations. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 22(7), 741–758 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Desai, P., Kekre, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Srinivasan, K.: Product differentiation and commonality in design: Balancing revenue and cost drivers. Management Science 47(1), 37–51 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fisher, M.: What is the right supply chain for your product? Harvard Business Review 75(2), 105–116 (1997)Google Scholar
  6. Fisher, M., Ittner, C.: The impact of product variety on automobile assembly operations: empirical evidence and simulation analysis. Management Science 45(6), 771–786 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoekstra, S., Romme, J., Argelo, S.: Integral logistic structures: developing customer-oriented goods flow. McGraw-Hill, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  8. Hopp, W., Spearman, M.: Factory physics. McGraw-Hill, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  9. Hopp, W., Spearman, M.: To Pull or Not to Pull: What Is the Question? Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 6(2), 133–148 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hüttmeir, A., de Treville, S., van Ackere, A., Monnier, L., Prenninger, J.: Trading off between heijunka and just-in-sequence. International Journal of Production Economics 118(2), 501–507 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ittner, C., Larcker, D., Randall, T.: The activity-based cost hierarchy, production policies and firm profitability. Journal of Management Accounting Research 9, 143–162 (1997)Google Scholar
  12. Labro, E.: The cost effects of component commonality: a literature review through a management-accounting lens. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 6(4), 358–367 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lancaster, K.: The economics of product variety: A survey. Marketing Science 9(3), 189–206 (1990)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Law, A., Kelton, W., Kelton, W.: Simulation modeling and analysis, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  15. Liker, J., Wu, Y.: Japanese automakers, US suppliers and supply chain superiority. Sloan Management Review 42(1), 81–93 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. Mason-Jones, R., Towill, D.: Using the information decoupling point to improve supply chain performance. International Journal of Logistics Management 10(2), 13–26 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mishina K, Takeda K (1995) Toyota motor manufacturing, USA, Inc. Harvard Business School Case 9-693-019Google Scholar
  18. Naylor, J., Naim, M., Berry, D.: Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics 62(1-2), 107–118 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olhager, J.: Strategic positioning of the order penetration point. International Journal of Production Economics 85(3), 319–329 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sharman, G.: The rediscovery of logistics. Harvard Business Review 62(5), 71–79 (1984)Google Scholar
  21. Silver, E.: Process management instead of operations management. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management 6(4), 273–279 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Swaminathan, J., Tayur, S.: Models for supply chains in e-business. Management Science 49(10), 1387–1406 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thun, J., Marble, R., Silveira-Camaros, V.: A conceptual framework and empirical results of the risk and potential of just in sequence: a study of the German automotive industry. Journal of Operations and Logistics 1(2), 1–13 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. Van Hoek, R.: The rediscovery of postponement: a literature review and directions for research. Journal of Operations Management 19(2), 161–184 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vorst, J., Beulens, A., Wit, W., Beek, P.: Supply chain management in food chains: Improving performance by reducing uncertainty. International Transactions in Operational Research 5(6), 487–499 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Enterprise Institute, Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of NeuchâtelNeuchâtelSwitzerland
  2. 2.University of Applied Sciences BFI ViennaWienAustria

Personalised recommendations