In-Transit Distribution Strategy: Hope for European Factories?

  • Per HilletofthEmail author
  • Frida Claesson
  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola
Conference paper


In this research the in-transit distribution strategy is investigated by determining and analyzing key principles of the strategy. It is examined through a multiple case study and simulation. This research reveals that the in-transit distribution strategy is about considering goods that are being transported as a mobile inventory and actively dispatching goods to a destination, where there is a predicted demand before any customer orders are received. It can give major competitive advantages by offering rather short lead-times for customers without having to store products locally. This, in turn, gives lower warehousing costs, lower tied-up capital, a less interrupted manufacturing, and steady as well as continuous production volumes. It is a workable solution for European manufactures competing in distant market. To be successful with this strategy, it takes good planning, working closely with customers, first-class market knowledge, and a supporting enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. Other highlighted requirements are low variation in demand and predictable distribution lead-time. Simulation study of one hypothetical product group verified case study findings, but we find it interesting that especially manufacturing output variance is very sensitive regarding the overall results. Also increasing average customer demand results in undesired outcomes.


Distribution Strategy Customer Order Safety Stock Case Company Enterprise Resource Planning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Christopher, M., Lowson, R., Peck, H.: Creating agile supply chains in the fashion industry. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management 32(8), 367–376 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Christopher, M., Peck, H., Towill, D.: A taxonomy for selecting global supply chain strategies. International Journal of Logistics Management 17(2), 277–287 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cohen, M., Lee, H.: Out of the touch with customer needs? Spare parts and after sales service. Sloan Management Review 31(2), 55–66 (1990)Google Scholar
  4. Don Taylor, G., Love, D., Weaver, M., Stone, J.: Determining inventory service support levels in multi-national companies. International Journal of Production Economics 116(1), 1–11 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fites, D.: Make your dealers your partners. Harvard Business Review 74(2), 84–95 (1996)Google Scholar
  6. Harrison, A., van Hoek, R.: Logistics management and strategy. Person Education Limited, Essex (2008)Google Scholar
  7. Ivanova, O., Hilmola, O.: Asian companies and distribution strategies for Russian markets: Case study. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development 6(3), 376–396 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jonsson, P.: Logistics and Supply Chain Management. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  9. Mangan, J., Lalwani, C., Butcher, T.: Global logistics and supply chain management. John Wiley & Sons, London (2008)Google Scholar
  10. Mason, R., Lalwani, C.: Mass customized distribution. International Journal of Production Economics 114, 71–83 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Muckstadt, J., Thomas, L.: Improving inventory productivity in multilevel distribution systems. In: Gautschi, D.A. (ed.) Productivity and Efficiency in Distribution Systems, pp. 169–182. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1983)Google Scholar
  12. Olhager J (2000) Produktionsekonomi. Studentlitteratur, LundGoogle Scholar
  13. Skinner, W.: The focused factory: New approach to managing manufacturing sees our productivity crisis as the problem of how to compete. Harvard Business Review 52(3), 113–121 (1974)Google Scholar
  14. Tyworth, J., Zeng, A.: Estimating the effects of carrier transit-time performance on logistics cost and service. Transportation Research Part A 32(2), 89–97 (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Waters, C.: Global Logistics: New directions in supply chain management. Kogan Page, London (2006)Google Scholar
  16. Wilson, M.: The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E 43(4), 295–320 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Per Hilletofth
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frida Claesson
    • 1
  • Olli-Pekka Hilmola
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Technology and SocietyUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.Lappeenranta University of TechnologyKouvolaFinland

Personalised recommendations