Advertisement

The Impact of Technological Change and OIPs on Lead Time Reduction

  • Krisztina DemeterEmail author
  • Zsolt Matyusz
Conference paper

Abstract

The paper examines the effect of technological change on operations improvement programs (OIPs) and operational performance. Previous studies in the field of operations management seldom took into account how the technological change rate of the industry affects the use of manufacturing programs and the resulting performance despite the importance of technological innovation in manufacturing. Our goal was to confirm empirically that plants with different level of achieved lead time reduction used certain OIPs to a different extent. We also analyzed how the technological change rate of the industry affects the use of OIPs. We used ANOVA and multiway ANOVA to confirm our hypotheses. Data were acquired through the fifth round of the International Manufacturing Strategy Survey (IMSS), which contains more than 550 companies from the ISIC sectors 28–35. We found that companies with effective lead time reduction implemented OIPs to a greater extent, and also process technology changes have a higher impact on the use of OIPs than product technology changes.

Keywords

lead time reduction technological change operations improvement programs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acur, N., Gertsen, F., Sun, H., Frick, J.: The formalisation of manufacturing strategy and its influence on the relationship between competitive objectives, improvement goals, and action plans. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 23(10), 1114–1141 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angel, D., Engstrom, J.: Manufacturing systems and technological change: The US personal computer industry. Economic Geography 71(1), 79–102 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackburn J (1991) Time-based competition: the next battleground in American manufacturing. Business One Irwin, Homewood, ILGoogle Scholar
  4. Bourgeois III, L.: Strategy and environment: A conceptual integration. Academy of Management Review 5(1), 25–39 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cagliano, R., Spina, G.: How improvement programmes of manufacturing are selected The role of strategic priorities and past experience. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 20(7), 772 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cagliano, R., Caniato, F., Spina, G.: The linkage between supply chain integration and manufacturing improvement programmes. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 26(3), 282–299 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cooper, R., Zmud, R.: Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach. Management Science 36(2), 123–139 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Treville, S., Antonakis, J.: Could lean production job design be intrinsically motivating? Contextual, configurational, and levels-of-analysis issues. Journal of Operations Management 24(2), 99–123 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Demeter K, Matyusz Z (2008) The impact of size on manufacturing practices and performance. In: EurOMA Conference, GroningenGoogle Scholar
  10. Frohlich, M., Westbrook, R.: Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of Operations Management 19(2), 185–200 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Husseini, S., O’Brien, C.: Strategic implications of manufacturing performance comparisons for newly industrialising countries. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 24(11), 1126–1148 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hyland, P., Kennedy, J., Mellor, R.: Company size and the adoption of manufacturing technology. Journal of New Business Ideas and Trends 2(1), 66–74 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Laugen, B., Acur, N., Boer, H., Frick, J.: Best manufacturing practices. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25(2), 131–150 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liker, J.: The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill Professional, USA (2004)Google Scholar
  15. Lindberg, P., Voss, C., Blackmon, K.: International manufacturing strategies: context, content, and change. Kluwer Academic Pub, Netherlands (1998)Google Scholar
  16. Mehrabi, M., Ulsoy, A., Koren, Y., Heytler, P.: Trends and perspectives in flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing 13(2), 135–146 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Podsakoff, P., MacKenzie, S., Lee, J., Podsakoff, N.: Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology 88(5), 879–903 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raymond, L., Julien, P., Carriere, J., Lachance, R.: Managing technological change in manufacturing SMEs: a multiple case analysis. International Journal of Technology Management 11(3), 270–285 (1996)Google Scholar
  19. Sirilli, G., Evangelista, R.: Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: results from Italian surveys. Research Policy 27(9), 881–899 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sousa, R., Voss, C.: Contingency research in operations management practices. Journal of Operations Management 26(6), 697–713 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stalk, G.: Time–the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review 66(4), 41–51 (1988)Google Scholar
  22. Suri, R.: Quick response manufacturing. Productivity Press Portland, OR, New York, NY, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  23. Ward, P., Zhou, H.: Impact of Information Technology Integration and Lean/Just-In-Time Practices on Lead-Time Performance*. Decision Sciences 37(2), 177–203 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hungary Department of Logistics and Supply Chain ManagementCorvinus University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations