Advertisement

Modular Product Architecture: The Role of Information Exchange for Customization

  • AHM ShamsuzzohaEmail author
  • Petri T. Helo
Conference paper

Abstract

In order to comply with growing customization, firms are looking for flexible design architecture in their product development (PD) processes. This flexible design architecture would enable easy, low cost and faster PD process. The basic requirement for design flexibilities is to ensure proper information flow within the design architecture. The role of information exchange influences the basic architecture of product development process, which also affects the general theme of product customization. In today’s volatile business environment, proper way of information management could be an added value for manufacturing firms. This paper deals with the importance of information flow modeling over product architecture. The basic principle of product architecture and its effect on product customization process are reported. A case study is presented within the scope of this paper with a view to model the information tracking system applicable for design architecture and product customization.

Keywords

product architecture modular design design structure matrix (DSM) domain mapping matrix (DMM) customization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Afuah, A.: Innovation management: Strategies, implementation, and profits. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1998)Google Scholar
  2. Amoako-Gyampah, K., Acquaah, M.: Manufacturing strategy, competitive strategy and firm performance: An empirical study in a developing economy environment. International Journal of Production Economics 111(2), 575–592 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin C, Clark C (1994) Modularity-in-design: An analysis based on the theory of real options. Working Paper 93-026, Harvard Business School, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, C., Clark, K.: Managing in an age of modularity. Harvard Business Review 75(5), 84–93 (1997)Google Scholar
  5. Baldwin, C., Clark, K.: Design rules: The power of modularity, vol. 1. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  6. Blecker, T., Friedrich, G., Kaluza, B., Abdelkafi, N.: Information and management systems for product customization. Springer Science + Business Media, Inc., Heidelberg (2005)Google Scholar
  7. Broekhuizen, T., Alsem, K.: Success factors for mass customization: A conceptual model. Journal of Market-Focused Management 5(4), 309–330 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Browning, T.: Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition andintegration problems: A review and new directions. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 48(3), 292–306 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browning, T., Deyst, J., Eppinger, S., Whitney, D.: Adding value in product development by creating information and reducing risk. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49(4), 443–458 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buxey, G.: Strategies in an era of global competition. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 20, 997–1016 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calantone, R., Di Benedetto, C.: Clustering product launches by price and launch strategy. Journal of Business Industrial Marketing 22(1), 4–19 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chesbrough, H., Prencipe, A.: Networks of innovation and modularity: A dynamic perspective. International Journal of Technology Management 42(4), 414–425 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chmarra M, Arts L, Tomiyama T (2008) Towards adaptable architecture. ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Dahmus, J., Gonzalez-Zugasti, J., Otto, K.: Modular product architecture. Design Studies 22(5), 409–424 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dellaert, B., Stremersch, S.: Marketing mass-customized products: Striking a balance between utility and complexity. Journal of Marketing Research 42(2), 219–227 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duray, R., Ward, P., Milligan, G., Berry, W.: Approaches to mass customization: Configurations and empirical validation. Journal of Operations Management 18(6), 605–626 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Entsua-Mensah, C.: Towards effective information management: A view from Ghana. International Journal of Information Management 16(2), 149–156 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eppinger S, Salminen V (2001) Patterns of product development interactions. Proceedings of International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’01Google Scholar
  19. Eppinger, S., Whitney, D., Smith, R., Gebala, D.: A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development. Research in Engineering Design 6(1), 1–13 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ericsson, A., Erixon, G.: Controlling design variants: Modular product platforms. ASME Press, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  21. Finne, C.: Publishing building product information: A value net perspective. Construction Innovation 6(2), 79–96 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fixson, S.: Modularity and commonality research: Past developments and future opportunities. Concurrent Engineering Research Applications 15(2), 85–111 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forza, C., Salvador, F.: Information flows for high-performance manufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics 70(1), 21–36 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Franke, N., Schreier, M.: Product uniqueness as a driver of customer utility in mass customization. Marketing Letters 19(2), 93–107 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ha, A., Porteus, E.: Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability. Management Science 41, 1431–1447 (1995)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, G., Simpson, T., Pine II, B.: The power of product platforms in mass customisation. International Journal of Mass Customisation 1, 1–13 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jiao, J., Tseng, M.: Fundamentals of product family architecture. Integrated Manufacturing Systems 11, 469–483 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jiao, J., Simpson, T., Siddique, Z.: Product family design and platform-based product development: A state-of-the-art review. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 18, 5–29 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joglekar, N., Yassine, A.: Management of information technology driven product development processes. In: Ganeshan, R., Boone, T. (eds.) New directions in supply-chain management: technology, strategy, and implementation, AMACOM, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  30. Jose, A., Tollenaere, M.: Modular and platform methods for product family design: Literature analysis. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing 16, 371–390 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Karandikar, H., Nidamarthi, S.: Implementing a platform strategy for a systems business via standardization. Management 18, 267–280 (2007)Google Scholar
  32. Kiritsis, D., Bufardi, A., Xirouchakis, P.: Research issues on product lifecycle management and information tracking using smart embedded systems. Advanced Engineering Informatics 17, 189–202 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kleinschmidt, E., de Brentani, U., Salomo, S.: Performance of global new product development programs: A resource-based view. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24, 419–441 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kumar, A.: From mass customization to mass personalization: A strategic transformation. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 19, 533–547 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumar, S., Liu, D.: Impact of globalisation on entrepreneurial enterprises in the world markets. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development 2, 46–64 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lau Antonio, K., Yam, R., Tang, E.: The impacts of product modularity on competitive capabilities and performance: An empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics 105(1), 1–20 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lee, C., Zhou, X.: Quality management and manufacturing strategies in China. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management 17, 876–898 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCutcheon, D., Raturi, A., Meredith, J.: The customization-responsiveness squeeze. Sloan Management Review 35, 89–89 (1994)Google Scholar
  39. Meyer, M., Tertzakian, P., Utterback, J.: Metrics for managing research and development in the context of the product family. Management Science 43, 88–111 (1997)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mikkola J (2000) Modularization assessment of product architecture. Proceedings of DRUID’Winter Conference 2000, Hillerod, Denmark, January 2Google Scholar
  41. Muffatto, M., Roveda, M.: Product architecture and platforms: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Technology Management 24, 1–16 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Panchal J, Fathianathan M (2008) Product realization in the age of mass collaboration. In: Proceedings of ASME 2008 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  43. Piller, F.: Observations on the present and future of mass customization. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 19, 630–636 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Piller, F., Reichwald, R., Tseng, M.: Competitive advantage through customer centric enterprises. International Journal of Mass Customisation 1, 157–165 (2006)Google Scholar
  45. Pine, B.: Mass customization: The new frontier in business competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1993)Google Scholar
  46. Pine, B., Gilmore, J.: Authenticity what consumers really want. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2007)Google Scholar
  47. Pollard, D., Chuo, S., Lee, B.: Strategies For Mass Customization. Journal of Business & Economics Research 6, 77–86 (2008)Google Scholar
  48. Salvador, F., Forza, C., Rungtusanatham, M.: Modularity, product variety, production volume, and component sourcing: Theorizing beyond generic prescriptions. Journal of Operations Management 20, 549–575 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J.: Modularity, flexibility, and knowledge management in product and organization design. Strategic Management Journal 17, 63–76 (1996)Google Scholar
  50. Shamsuzzoha, A.: Restructuring design processes for better information exchange. International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development 7, 299–313 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shamsuzzoha A (2010) Modular product development for mass customization. PhD thesis, University of Vaasa, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  52. Simon, H.: The architecture of complexity. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106, 467–482 (1962)Google Scholar
  53. Simpson, T.: Product platform design and customization: Status and promise. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 18, 3–20 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Slater, S., Mohr, J.: Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: Insights based on strategy type. Journal of Product Innovation Management 23, 26–33 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Söderquist, K., Nellore, R.: Information systems in fast cycle development: Identifying user needs in integrated automotive component development. R & D Management 30, 199–212 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Staudenmayer, N., Tripsas, M., Tucci, C.: Interfirm modularity and its implications for product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management 22, 303–321 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Steward, A.D.: The design structure system: A method for managing the design of complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 28, 71–74 (1981)Google Scholar
  58. Su, J., Chang, Y., Ferguson, M.: Evaluation of postponement structures to accommodate mass customization. Journal of Operations Management 23, 305–318 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Thevenot, H., Simpson, T.: A comprehensive metric for evaluating component commonality in a product family. Journal of Engineering Design 18, 577–598 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ulrich, K.: The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24, 419–440 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ulrich, K., Eppinger, S., et al.: Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  62. Vickers, P.: Common problems of documentary information transfer, storage and retrieval in industrial organizations. Journal of Documentation 39, 217–229 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Vickers, P.: Promoting the concept of information management within organisations. Journal of Information Science 9, 123–127 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang, B., Burns, N., Backhouse, C.: Postponement: A review and an integrated framework. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 24, 468–487 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yassine A (2004) An introduction to modeling and analyzing complex product development processes using the design structure matrix (DSM) method. Quaderni di Management (Italian Management Review) 9Google Scholar
  66. Yassine, A., Falkenburg, D.: A framework for design process specifications management. Journal of Engineering Design 10, 223–234 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Yassine, A., Kim, K., Roemer, T., Holweg, M.: Investigating the role of IT in customized product design. Production Planning & Control 15, 422–434 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yassine, A., Sreenivas, R., Zhu, J.: Managing the exchange of information in product development. European Journal of Operational Research 184, 311–326 (2008)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zacharias, N., Yassine, A.: Optimal platform investment for product family design. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing 19, 131–148 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ProductionUniversity of VaasaVaasaFinland

Personalised recommendations