Skip to main content

PET for Mediastinal Restaging of Patients with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer after Induction Therapy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 974 Accesses

Abstract

Despite significant advancement in the multimodality approach to lung cancer, the optimal management of patients with stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to be a challenge. Identifying pathological N2 disease is of importance because it significantly affects outcomes and potential treatment strategies. More widespread utilization of endobronchial ultrasound techniques and refinements in fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) imaging have considerably increased our ability to accurately stage patients with advanced lung cancer, consequently increasing the number of patients in the IIIA “borderline” resectable category. Improved stratification of patients in this category enables surgeons to select surgery for those most likely to benefit, improving outcomes and eliminating unnecessary thoracic morbidity. Recent phase III clinical trials demonstrate improved survival after surgical resection in patients who had mediastinal node clearance after induction therapy.1–4 These data emphasize the potential utility of a highly accurate test to preoperatively identify those patients who have achieved clearance of their mediastinal nodal metastases after induction therapy. Such a test would allow surgeons to limit resection to those patients with the greatest likelihood of long term benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albain KS, Rusch VW, Crowley JJ et al. Concurrent cisplatin/etoposide plus chest radiotherapy followed by surgery for stages IIIA(N2) and IIIb non-small-cell lung-cancer - mature results of Southwest-Oncology-Group Phase-II Study-8805. J Clin Oncol. 1995;13:1880–1892.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. van Meerbeeck JP, Kramer GW, Van Schil PE et al. Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:442–450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thomas M, Rube C, Hoffknecht P et al. Effect of preoperative chemoradiation in addition to preoperative chemotherapy: a randomised trial in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:636–648.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW et al. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;374:379–386.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Akhurst T, Downey RJ, Ginsberg MS et al. An initial experience with FDG-PET in the imaging of residual disease after induction therapy for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;73:259–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS. When is it best to repeat a 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan on patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy? Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1092–1097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hellwig D, Graeter TP, Ukena D, Georg T, Kirsch C-M, Schafers H-J. Value of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography after induction therapy of locally advanced bronchogenic carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128:892–899.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Port JL, Kent MS, Korst RJ, Keresztes R, Levin MA, Altorki NK. Positron emission tomography scanning poorly predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77:254–259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cerfolio RJ, Ojha B, Mukherjee S, Pask AH, Bass CS, Katholi CR. Positron emission tomography scanning with 2-fluoro-2-deoxy--glucose as a predictor of response of neoadjuvant treatment for non-small cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;125:938–944.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eschmann SM, Friedel G, Paulsen F et al. 18F-FDG PET for assessment of therapy response and preoperative re-evaluation after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:463–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoekstra CJ, Stroobants SG, Smit EF et al. Prognostic relevance of response evaluation using [18F]-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8362–8370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohtsuka T, Nomori H, Ebihara A et al. FDG-PET imaging for lymph node staging and pathologic tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;12:89–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pottgen C, Levegrun S, Theegarten D et al. Value of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer for prediction of pathologic response and times to relapse after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:97–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Ojha B. Restaging patients with N2 (stage IIIa) non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;131:1229–1235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mawlawi O, Pan T, Macapinlac HA. PET/CT imaging techniques, considerations, and artifacts. J Thorac Imaging. 2006;21:99–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hautzel H, Muller-Gartner HW. Early changes in fluorine-18-FDG uptake during radiotherapy. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1384–1386.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ryu J-S, Choi NC, Fischman AJ, Lynch TJ, Mathisen DJ. FDG-PET in staging and restaging non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: correlation with histopathology. Lung Cancer. 2002;35:179–187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. De Leyn P, Stroobants S, De Wever W et al. Prospective comparative study of integrated positron emission tomography-computed tomography scan compared with remediastinoscopy in the assessment of residual mediastinal lymph node disease after induction chemotherapy for mediastinoscopy-proven stage IIIA-N2 Non-small-cell lung cancer: a Leuven Lung Cancer Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3333–3339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nitzkorski, J.R., Siripurapu, V., Scott, W.J. (2011). PET for Mediastinal Restaging of Patients with Non Small Cell Lung Cancer after Induction Therapy. In: Ferguson, M. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Thoracic Surgery. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-492-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-492-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-364-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-492-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics