Advertisement

IPL Treatment for Vascular Lesions

Chapter

Abstract

According to the International Society of the Study of Vascular Anomalies, vascular anomalies can be classified as vascular tumors (origin in the endothelial hyperplasiate and vascular malformations (normal endothelial turnover). Hemangiomas are the most common benign vascular tumors of infancy. Port-wine stains are present in 0.3–0.5% of newborns and are congenital malformations of the superficial dermal capillaries. The vascular lesions that most benefit from IPL treatment are: hemangiomas, PWS, angiomas, telangiectasias, leg veins, rosacea and Poikiloderma of Civatte. Angiofibroma, cutaneous lesions of Kaposi sarcoma, Blue Rubber Nevus syndrome, hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasias and stria distensia may also have some benefit. The main chromophores are oxyhemoglobin and deoxyhemoglobin. Superficial red vascular lesions have a high amount of oxyhemoglobin. The pulse duration should be shorter than the thermal relaxation time of the chromophore to preferentially protect the surrounding tissue from heat damage. The need for multiple treatments should be emphasized to the patient. For deep hemangiomas, IPL treatment alone is not effective. Capillary malformations on the limbs have less response to treatment compared to those on the head and neck.

Keywords

Vascular Lesion Vascular Malformation Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia Venous Malformation Capillary Malformation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adamic M, Troilius A, Adatto M et al. Vascular lasers and IPLS: guidelines for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD). J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2007; 9(2): 113–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adrian RM. Treatment of leg telangiectasias using a long-pulse frequency-doubled neodymium:YAG laser at 532 nm. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(1):19–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Buainian H, Verhaeghe E, Dierckxsens L et al. Early treatment of hemangiomas with lasers. A review. Dermatology. 2003;206(4):370–373.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alora MB, Stern RS, Arndt KA et al. Comparison of the 595 nm long-pulse (1.5 msec) and ultralong-pulse (4 msec) lasers in the treatment of leg veins. Dermatol Surg. 1999; 25(6):445–449.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Angermeier MC. Treatment of facial vascular lesions with intense pulsed light. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(2):95–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astner S, Anderson RR. Treating vascular lesions. Dermatol Ther. 2005;18(3):267–281.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barsky SH, Rosen S, Geer DE et al. The nature and evolution of port wine stains: a computer-assisted study. J Invest Dermatol. 1980;74(3):154–157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumler W, Vural E, Landthaler M et al. The effects of intense pulsed light (IPL) on blood vessels investigated by mathematical modeling. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(2):132–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bellew SG, Weiss MA, Weiss RA. Comparison of intense pulsed light to 595-nm long-pulsed pulsed dye laser for treatment of hypertrophic surgical scars: a pilot study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2005;4(4):448–452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bernstein EF. Clinical characteristics of 500 consecutive patients presenting for laser removal of lower extremity spider veins. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(1):31–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernstein EF, Lee J, Lowery J et al. Treatment of spider veins with the 595 nm pulsed-dye laser. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;39(5 Pt 1):746–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bjerring P, Christiansen K, Troilius A. Intense pulsed light source for the treatment of dye laser resistant port-wine stains. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2003;5(1):7–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Black JF, Barton JK. Chemical and structural changes in blood undergoing laser photocoagulation. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;80:89–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Butler EG, 2nd, McClellan SD, Ross EV. Split treatment of photodamaged skin with KTP 532 nm laser with 10 mm handpiece versus IPL: a cheek-to-cheek comparison. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(2):124–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang SE, Ahn SJ, Rhee DY et al. Treatment of facial acne papules and pustules in Korean patients using an intense pulsed light device equipped with a 530- to 750-nm filter. Dermatol Surg. 2007;33(6):676–679.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapas AM, Geronemus RG. Our approach to pediatric dermatologic laser surgery. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37(4): 255–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chess C, Chess Q. Cool laser optics treatment of large telangiectasia of the lower extremities. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1993;19(1):74–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Chiu CS, Yang LC, Hong HS et al. Treatment of a tufted angioma with intense pulsed light. J Dermatolog Treat. 2007; 18(2): 109–111.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Clementoni MT, Gilardino P, Muti GF et al. Facial teleangectasias: our experience in treatment with IPL. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;37(1):9–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clementoni MT, Gilardino P, Muti GF et al. Intense pulsed light treatment of 1,000 consecutive patients with facial vascular marks. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2006;30(2):226–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cliff S, Misch K. Treatment of mature port wine stains with the PhotoDerm VL. J Cutan Laser Ther. 1999;1(2):101–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dierickx CC, Casparian JM, Venugopalan V et al. Thermal relaxation of port-wine stain vessels probed in vivo: the need for 1–10-millisecond laser pulse treatment. J Invest Der-matol.1995;105(5):709–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dover JS, Sadick NS, Goldman MP. The role of lasers and light sources in the treatment of leg veins. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(4):328–335; discussion 335–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Enjolras O, Riche MC, Merland JJ. Facial port-wine stains and Sturge-Weber syndrome. Pediatrics. 1985;76(1):48–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Eremia S, Li CY. Treatment of leg and face veins with a cryogen spray variable pulse width 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser-a prospective study of 47 patients. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2001; 3(3):147–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erol OO, Gurlek A, Agaoglu G et al. 2008:Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids Using Intense Pulsed Light (IPL). Aesthetic Plast Surg.Google Scholar
  27. Evans AV, Robson A, Barlow RJ et al. Treatment of port wine stains with photodynamic therapy, using pulsed dye laser as a light source, compared with pulsed dye laser alone: a pilot study. Lasers Surg Med. 2005;36(4):266–269.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fishman SJ, Mulliken JB. Hemangiomas and vascular malformations of infancy and childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am. 1993;40(6):1177–1200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Fodor L, Ramon Y, Fodor A et al. A side-by-side prospective study of intense pulsed light and Nd:YAG laser treatment for vascular lesions. Ann Plast Surg. 2006;56(2):164–170.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glassberg E, Lask G, Rabinowitz LG et al. Capillary hemangiomas: case study of a novel laser treatment and a review of therapeutic options. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1989; 15(11): 1214–1223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gold MH, Bradshaw VL, Boring MM et al. The use of a novel intense pulsed light and heat source and ALA-PDT in the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2004;3(6 Suppl):S15–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Goldman MP, Bennett RG. Treatment of telangiectasia: a review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987;17(2 Pt 1):167–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Goldman MP, Eckhouse S. Photothermal sclerosis of leg veins. ESC Medical Systems, LTD Photoderm VL Cooperative Study Group. Dermatol Surg. 1996;22(4):323–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goldman MP, Weiss RA, Weiss MA. Intense pulsed light as a nonablative approach to photoaging. Dermatol Surg. 2005; 31(9 Pt 2):1179–1187; discussion 1187.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Green D. Photothermal removal of telangiectases of the lower extremities with the PhotodermVL. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998;38(1):61–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Grossman MC. What is new in cutaneous laser research. Dermatol Clin. 1997;15(1):1–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Gupta G, Bilsland D. A prospective study of the impact of laser treatment on vascular lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2000; 143(2): 356–359.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Haedersdal M, Togsverd-Bo K, Wulf HC. Evidence-based review of lasers, light sources and photodynamic therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(3):267–278.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hansen K, Kreiter CD, Rosenbaum M et al. Long-term psychological impact and perceived efficacy of pulsed-dye laser therapy for patients with port-wine stains. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(1):49–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hercogova J, Brazzini B, Hautmann G et al. Laser treatment of cutaneous vascular lesions: face and leg telangiectases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2002;16(1):12–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hernandez-Perez E, Colombo-Charrier E, Valencia-Ibiett E. Intense pulsed light in the treatment of striae distensae. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(12):1124–1130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ho WS, Ying SY, Chan PC et al. Treatment of port wine stains with intense pulsed light: a prospective study. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30(6):887–890; discussion 890–881.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jacobs AH, Walton RG. The incidence of birthmarks in the neonate. Pediatrics. 1976;58(2):218–222.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Jasim ZF, Handley JM. Treatment of pulsed dye laser-resistant port wine stain birthmarks. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007; 57(4):677–682.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jorge BF, Del Pozo J, Castineiras I et al. Treatment of ulcerated haemangiomas with a non-coherent pulsed light source: brief initial clinical report. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2008; 10(1):48–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klapman MH, Yao JF. Thickening and nodules in port-wine stains. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44(2):300–302.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U. Laser therapy of vascular lesions. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2006;22(6):324–332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lanigan SW. Port wine stains on the lower limb: response to pulsed dye laser therapy. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1996; 21(2):88–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lanigan SW. Port-wine stains unresponsive to pulsed dye laser: explanations and solutions. Br J Dermatol. 1998; 139(2): 173–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lin XX, Wang W, Wu SF et al. Treatment of capillary vascular malformation (port-wine stains) with photochemotherapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(7):1826–1830.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Madonna Terracina FS, Curinga G, Mazzocchi M et al. Utilization of intense pulsed light in the treatment of face and neck erythrosis. Acta Chir Plast. 2007;49(2):51–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. McDaniel DH, Ash K, Lord J et al. Laser therapy of spider leg veins: clinical evaluation of a new long pulsed alexandrite laser. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(1):52–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McGill DJ, Mackay IR. Capillary vascular malformation response to increased ambient temperature is dependent upon anatomical location. Ann Plast Surg. 2007; 58(2): 193–199.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGill DJ, MacLaren W, Mackay IR. A direct comparison of pulsed dye, alexandrite, KTP and Nd:YAG lasers and IPL in patients with previously treated capillary malformations. Lasers Surg Med. 2008;40(6):390–398.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mulliken JB. Classification of vascular birthmarks. In “Vascular birthmarks, hemangiomas and maformations”. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1998.Google Scholar
  56. Neumann E, Frithz A. Capillaropathy and capillaroneogenesis in the pathogenesis of rosacea. Int J Dermatol. 1998; 37(4):263–266.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Omura NE, Dover JS, Arndt KA et al. Treatment of reticular leg veins with a 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(1):76–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ozdemir M, Engin B, Mevlitoglu I. Treatment of facial port-wine stains with intense pulsed light: a prospective study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7(2):127–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Railan D, Parlette EC, Uebelhoer NS et al. Laser treatment of vascular lesions. Clin Dermatol. 2006;24(1):8–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Raulin C, Greve B, Grema H. IPL technology: a review. Lasers Surg Med. 2003;32(2):78–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raulin C, Hellwig S, Schonermark MP. Treatment of a nonresponding port-wine stain with a new pulsed light source (PhotoDerm VL). Lasers Surg Med. 1997;21(2):203–208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Raulin C, Weiss RA, Schonermark MP. Treatment of essential telangiectasias with an intense pulsed light source (PhotoDerm VL). Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(10):941–945; discussion 945–946.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Raulin C, Werner S. Treatment of venous malformations with an intense pulsed light source (IPLS) technology: A retrospective study. Lasers Surg Med. 1999;25(2):170–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Renfro L, Geronemus RG. Anatomical differences of port-wine stains in response to treatment with the pulsed dye laser. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129(2):182–188.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reynolds N, Exley J, Hills S et al. The role of the Lumina intense pulsed light system in the treatment of port wine stains-a case controlled study. Br J Plast Surg. 2005;58(7):968–980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rojanamatin J, Choawawanich P. 2006;Treatment of inflammatory facial acne vulgaris with intense pulsed light and short contact of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 32(8): 991–996; discussion. 996–997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Ross EV, Smirnov M, Pankratov M et al. Intense pulsed light and laser treatment of facial telangiectasias and dyspigmentation: some theoretical and practical comparisons. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(9 Pt 2):1188–1198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Sadick NS. A dual wavelength approach for laser/intense pulsed light source treatment of lower extremity veins. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(1):66–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sami NA, Attia AT, Badawi AM. Phototherapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7(7):627–632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Santos MA, Belo VG, Santos G. Effectiveness of photodynamic therapy with topical 5-aminolevulinic acid and intense pulsed light versus intense pulsed light alone in the treatment of acne vulgaris: comparative study. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(8 Pt 1):910–915.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Schroeter CA, Haaf-von Below S, Neumann HA. Effective treatment of rosacea using intense pulsed light systems. Dermatol Surg. 2005;31(10):1285–1289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schroeter CA, Neumann HA. An intense light source. The photoderm VL-flashlamp as a new treatment possibility for vascular skin lesions. Dermatol Surg. 1998;24(7):743–748.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Shafirstein G, Baumler W, Lapidoth M et al. A new mathematical approach to the diffusion approximation theory for selective photothermolysis modeling and its implication in laser treatment of port-wine stains. Lasers Surg Med. 2004; 34(4):335–347.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sivarajan V, Maclaren WM, Mackay IR. The effect of varying pulse duration, wavelength, spot size, and fluence on the response of previously treated capillary vascular malformations to pulsed-dye laser treatment. Ann Plast Surg. 2006; 57(1):25–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sommer A, Van Mierlo PL, Neumann HA et al. Red and blue telangiectasias. Differences in oxygenation? Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(1):55–59.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tam AS, Sullivan B. Remote sensing applications of pulsed photothermal radiometry. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1983;43:333–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taub AF. A comparison of intense pulsed light, combination radiofrequency and intense pulsed light, and blue light in photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6(10):1010–1016.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Verkruysse W, Choi B, Zhang JR et al. Thermal depth profiling of vascular lesions: automated regularization of reconstruction algorithms. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(5):1463–1474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Viator JA, Au G, Paltauf G et al. Clinical testing of a photoacoustic probe for port wine stain depth determination. Lasers Surg Med. 2002;30(2):141–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Weiss RA, M A Weiss. Early clinical results with a multiple synchronized pulse 1064 NM laser for leg telangiectasias and reticular veins. Dermatol Surg. 1999;25(5):399–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wendelin DS, Pope DN, Mallory SB. Hypertrichosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;48(2):161–179; quiz 180–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Witman PM, Wagner AM, Scherer K et al. Complications following pulsed dye laser treatment of superficial hemangiomas. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38(2):116–123.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yeung CK, Shek SY, Bjerring P et al. A comparative study of intense pulsed light alone and its combination with photodynamic therapy for the treatment of facial acne in Asian skin. Lasers Surg Med. 2007;39(1):1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Plastic SurgeryRambam Health Care CampusHaifaIsrael
  2. 2.Maccabbi InsuranceTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations