Tendoscopy

  • Maayke Nadine van Sterkenburg
  • Peter Albert Johannes de Leeuw
  • Cornelis Nicolaas van Dijk
Chapter

Abstract

In contrast to arthroscopy, which has become the preferred technique to treat intra-articular ankle pathology, extra-articular problems of the ankle have traditionally demanded open surgery. Open ankle surgery has been associated with complications such as injury to the sural nerve or superficial peroneal nerve, infection, scarring, and stiffness of the ankle joint.1–3 The percentage of complications reported with open surgery for posterior ankle impingement (removal of os trigonum, scar tissue, hypertrophic posterior talar process, or ossicle) varies between 15% and 24%.1–4 The incidence of these complications has stimulated the development of extra-articular endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic surgery offers the advantages related to any minimally invasive procedure, such as fewer wound infections, less blood loss, smaller wounds and less morbidity. Aftertreatment is functional, and surgery is performed on an outpatient basis.5

Keywords

Achilles Tendon Tendon Sheath Peroneal Tendon Ankle Pain Patellar Tendinopathy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Abramowitz Y, Wollstein R, Barzilay Y et al. Outcome of resection of a symptomatic os trigonum. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1051–1057.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hamilton WG, Geppert MJ, Thompson FM. Pain in the posterior aspect of the ankle in ­dancers. Differential diagnosis and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1996;78:1491–1500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Marotta JJ, Micheli LJ. Os trigonum impingement in dancers. Am J Sports Med. 1992;20:533–536.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R. A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:871–876.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van Dijk CN. Hindfoot endoscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2000;8:365–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bassett FH III, Billys JB, Gates HS III. A simple surgical approach to the posteromedial ankle. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:144–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dombek MF, Lamm BM, Saltrick K, Mendicino RW, Catanzariti AR. Peroneal tendon tears: a retrospective review. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2003;42:250–258.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scholten PE, van Dijk CN. Tendoscopy of the peroneal tendons. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:415–420, vii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Roggatz J, Urban A. The calcareous peritendinitis of the long peroneal tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1980;96:161–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schweitzer GJ. Stenosing peroneal tenovaginitis. Case reports. S Afr Med J. 1982;61:521–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heckman DS, Reddy S, Pedowitz D, Wapner KL, Parekh SG. Operative treatment for peroneal tendon disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:404–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yao L, Tong DJ, Cracchiolo A, Seeger LL. MR findings in peroneal tendonopathy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1995;19:460–464.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Scholten PE, van Dijk CN. Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:439–446, viii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Dijk CN, van Dyk GE, Scholten PE, Kort NP. Endoscopic calcaneoplasty. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:185–189.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Kort N. Tendoscopy (tendon sheath endoscopy) for overuse tendon injuries. Oper Techn Sports Med. 1997;5:170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Dijk CN, Kort N. Tendoscopy of the peroneal tendons. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:471–478.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    de Leeuw PAJ, Golano P, van Dijk CN. A 3-portal endoscopic groove deepening technique for recurrent peroneal tendon dislocation. Techn Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;7:250–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lui TH. Endoscopic peroneal retinaculum reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:478–481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Myerson MS. Adult acquired flatfoot deformity: treatment of dysfunction of the posterior tibial tendon. Instr Course Lect. 1997;46:393–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bulstra GH, Olsthoorn PG, Niek van DC. Tendoscopy of the posterior tibial tendon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:421–427, viii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Dijk CN, Kort N, Scholten PE. Tendoscopy of the posterior tibial tendon. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:692–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Michelson J, Easley M, Wigley FM, Hellmann D. Posterior tibial tendon dysfunction in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 1995;16:156–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trnka HJ. Dysfunction of the tendon of tibialis posterior. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86:939–946.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller SD, Van HM, Boruta PM, Wu KK, Katcherian DA. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of posterior tibial tendon pathology. Foot Ankle Int. 1996;17:555–558.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Porter DA, Baxter DE, Clanton TO, Klootwyk TE. Posterior tibial tendon tears in young competitive athletes: two case reports. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19:627–630.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lui TH. Endoscopic assisted posterior tibial tendon reconstruction for stage 2 posterior tibial tendon insufficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1228–1234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bare AA, Haddad SL. Tenosynovitis of the posterior tibial tendon. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6:37–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Paus AC. Arthroscopic synovectomy. When, which diseases and which joints. Z Rheumatol. 1996;55:394–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnson KA, Strom DE. Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;196–206.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chow HT, Chan KB, Lui TH. Tendoscopic debridement for stage I posterior tibial tendon dysfunction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005;13:695–698.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Clain MR, Baxter DE. Achilles tendinitis. Foot Ankle. 1992;13:482–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Saltzman CL, Tearse DS. Achilles tendon injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1998;6:316–325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Maffulli N, Walley G, Sayana MK, Longo UG, Denaro V. Eccentric calf muscle training in athletic patients with Achilles tendinopathy. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Maffulli N, Kenward MG, Testa V, Capasso G, Regine R, King JB. Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy with tendinosis. Clin J Sport Med. 2003;13:11–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Steenstra F, van Dijk CN. Achilles tendoscopy. Foot Ankle Clin. 2006;11:429–438, viii.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Williams JG. Achilles tendon lesions in sport. Sports Med. 1993;16:216–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Segesser B, Goesele A, Renggli P. [The Achilles tendon in sports]. Orthopade. 1995;24:252–267.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gruber, W. Beobachtungen aus der Menschlichen und Vergleichenden Anatomie. Berlin, Germany: A Hirschwald; 1879.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Schwalbe G, Pfitzner W. Varietäten-Statistik und Anthropologie. DeutscheMed Wchnschr. 1894;XXV:459.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ko R., Porter M. Interactive Foot and Ankle 2. London: Primal Pictures; 2000.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Mafi N, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H. Superior short-term results with eccentric calf muscle training compared to concentric training in a randomized prospective multicenter study on patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2001;9:42–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Norregaard J, Larsen CC, Bieler T, Langberg H. Eccentric exercise in treatment of Achilles tendinopathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2007;17:133–138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ohberg L, Lorentzon R, Alfredson H. Eccentric training in patients with chronic Achilles tendinosis: normalised tendon structure and decreased thickness at follow up. Br J Sports Med. 2004;38:8–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Woodley BL, Newsham-West RJ, Baxter GD. Chronic tendinopathy: effectiveness of eccentric exercise. Br J Sports Med. 2007;41:188–198.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Silbernagel KG, Thomee R, Thomee P, Karlsson J. Eccentric overload training for patients with chronic Achilles tendon pain–a randomised controlled study with reliability testing of the evaluation methods. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2001;11:197–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Alfredson H, Ohberg L. Increased intratendinous vascularity in the early period after sclerosing injection treatment in Achilles tendinosis: a healing response? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:399–401.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Alfredson H, Ohberg L, Zeisig E, Lorentzon R. Treatment of midportion Achilles tendinosis: similar clinical results with US and CD-guided surgery outside the tendon and sclerosing polidocanol injections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1504–1509.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Alfredson H, Lorentzon R. Sclerosing polidocanol injections of small vessels to treat the chronic painful tendon. Cardiovasc Hematol Agents Med Chem. 2007;5:97–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Andersson G, Danielson P, Alfredson H, Forsgren S. Nerve-related characteristics of ventral paratendinous tissue in chronic Achilles tendinosis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:1272–1279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Ultrasound guided sclerosis of neovessels in painful chronic Achilles tendinosis: pilot study of a new treatment. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:173–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Willberg L, Sunding K, Ohberg L, Forssblad M, Fahlstrom M, Alfredson H. Sclerosing injections to treat midportion Achilles tendinosis: a randomised controlled study evaluating two different concentrations of Polidocanol. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16:859–864.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lind B, Ohberg L, Alfredson H. Sclerosing polidocanol injections in mid-portion Achilles tendinosis: remaining good clinical results and decreased tendon thickness at 2-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2006;14:1327–1332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kvist M. Achilles tendon injuries in athletes. Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1991;80:188–201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Maffulli N. Augmented repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures using gastrocnemius-soleus fascia. Int Orthop. 2005;29:134.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Maffulli N, Testa V, Capasso G, Bifulco G, Binfield PM. Results of percutaneous longitudinal tenotomy for Achilles tendinopathy in middle- and long-distance runners. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:835–840.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Testa V, Maffulli N, Capasso G, Bifulco G. Percutaneous longitudinal tenotomy in chronic Achilles tendonitis. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1996;54:241–244.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Testa V, Capasso G, Benazzo F, Maffulli N. Management of Achilles tendinopathy by ultrasound-guided percutaneous tenotomy. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002;34:573–580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kannus P, Jozsa L. Histopathological changes preceding spontaneous rupture of a tendon. A controlled study of 891 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991;73:1507–1525.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Khan KM, Forster BB, Robinson J et al. Are ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of value in assessment of Achilles tendon disorders? A two year prospective study. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37:149–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Maquirriain J, Ayerza M, Costa-Paz M, Muscolo DL. Endoscopic surgery in chronic achilles tendinopathies: a preliminary report. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:298–303.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Willberg L, Sunding K, Ohberg L, Forssblad M, Alfredson H. Treatment of Jumper’s knee: promising short-term results in a pilot study using a new arthroscopic approach based on imaging findings. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15:676–681.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maayke Nadine van Sterkenburg
    • 1
  • Peter Albert Johannes de Leeuw
  • Cornelis Nicolaas van Dijk
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical CenterUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations