Advertisement

Three Levels of Failure: Analysing a Workflow Management System

  • Tom GrossEmail author
  • Samuli Pekkola
Chapter
Part of the Computer Supported Cooperative Work book series (CSCW)

Abstract

In this paper we report on a case study of the introduction of a workflow management for travel management in a higher education organisation. We aim at addressing two central questions. Firstly, why did a workflow management system (WfMS), which was initially anticipated and welcomed, create complaints that go far beyond the well-known resistance towards the introduction of new systems? And secondly, why did the users regard this workflow management system and its introduction as a failure? The answers that we found to these two central questions are valuable lesson learned for the designers of user-friendly workflow management systems. And, they also have implications to the general organisational resistance discussion, where for instance Piderit (2000) asked for more individually oriented approaches to gain more understanding about cognitive ambivalences of individuals and their adaptation to new systems. Although we do not study cognitive processes, the study provides a basis to understand individual users and their roles and expectations in the organisational context.

Keywords

Business Process Central Administration Paper Copy Organisational Issue Travel Plan 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abbott, A. A Primer on Sequence Methods. Organisation Science 1, 4 (1990). pp. 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abbott, K.R. and Sarin, S.K. Experiences with Workflow Management: Issues for the Next Generation. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work – CSCW’94 (Oct. 22–26, Chapel Hill, NC). ACM, N.Y. (1994). pp. 113–120.Google Scholar
  3. Abdel-Hamid, T.K. and Madnick, S.E. Lessons Learned from Modelling the Dynamics of Software Development. Communications of the ACM 32, 12 (Dec. 1989). pp. 1426–1455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agostini, A. and de Michelis, G. A Light Workflow Management System Using Simple Process Models. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing. 9(3–4) (2000). pp. 335–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bansler, J.P. and Havn, E. Technology-Use Mediation: Making Sense of Electronic Communication in an Organisational Context. Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work – Group 2003 (Nov. 9–12, Sanibel Island, FL). ACM, N.Y. (2003). pp. 135–143.Google Scholar
  6. Bowers, J., Button, G. and Sharrock, W. Workflow from Within and Without: Technology and Cooperative Work on the Print Industry Shopfloor. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Kluwer, Stockholm, Sweden (1995).Google Scholar
  7. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Paraboschi, S. and Pozzi, G. Specification and Implementation of Exceptions in Workflow Management Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 24, 3 (Sept. 1999). pp. 405–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conery, J.C., Catchen, J.M. and Lynch, M. Rule-Based Workflow Management for Bioinformatics. International Journal on Very Large Data Bases 14, 3 (Sept. 2005). pp. 318–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crabtree, A., Nicols, D.M., O’Brien, J., Rouncefield, M. and Twidale, M.B. Ethnomethologically Informed Ethnography and Information System Design. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, 7 (May 2000). pp. 666–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Divitini, M. and Simone, C. Supporting Different Dimensions of Adaptability in Workflow Modeling, Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 9(3–4) (2000). pp. 365–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dix, A., Finlay, J., Abowd, G.D. and Beale, R. Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (2003).Google Scholar
  12. Dourish, P., Holmes, J., MacLean, A., Marqvardsen, P. and Zbyslaw, A. Freeflow: Mediating Between Representation and Action in Workflow Systems. Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Boston, Mass (1996). pp. 190–198.Google Scholar
  13. Dourish, P. Process Descriptions as Organisational Accounting Devices: the Dual Use of Workflow Technologies, Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work, Sept. 30–Oct. 3 (2001), Boulder, CO, pp. 52–60.Google Scholar
  14. Gallivan, M.J. Organisational Adoption and Assimilation of Complex Technological Innovations: Development and Application of a New Framework. ACM SIGMIS Database 32, 3 (Summer 2001). pp. 51–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grudin, J. Is HCI Homeless? In Search of Inter-Disciplinary Status. ACM Interactions 13, 1 (Jan./Feb. 2006). pp. 54–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grudin, J. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work: History and Focus. IEEE Computer 27, 5 (May 1994). pp. 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, S., Berente, N. and Lyytinen, K. Emerging Principles for Requirements Processes in Organizational Contexts. Networking and Information Systems 13 (2008). pp. 9–35.Google Scholar
  18. Iivari, J., Isomäki, H., and Pekkola, S. The User – The Great Unknown of Systems Development: Reasons, Forms, Challenges, Experiences and Intellectual Contributions of User Involvement. Information Systems Journal 20(2) (2010). pp. 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Iivari, J. and Iivari, N. Varieties of User-Centeredness: An Analysis of Four Systems Development Methods. Information Systems Journal forthcoming.Google Scholar
  20. Isomäki, H. and Pekkola, S. Nuances of Human-Centredeness in Information Systems Development. Proceedings of 38th Hawaii International Conference of System Sciences (HICSS38) Jan. 3–6, (2005) Big Island, HI.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, S. and Seebeck, L. Harnessing Complexity in CSCW. Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Bonn, Germany (2001). pp. 359–378.Google Scholar
  22. Karsten, H. Collaboration and Collaborative Information Technologies: A Review of the Evidence. ACM SIGMIS Database 30, 2 (Spring 1999). pp. 44–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim, H.-W. and Pan, S.L. Towards a Process of Information Systems Implementation: The Case of Customer Relationship Management (CRM). ACM SIGMIS Database 37, 1 (Winter 2006). pp. 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kreifelts, T., Hinrichs, E. and Woetzel, G. Sharing To-Do Lists with a Distributed Task Manager. In Proc. Third European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work - ECSCW’93 (Sept. 13–17, Milan, Italy). Kluwer. pp. 31–46.Google Scholar
  25. Lin, A. and Cornford, T. Framing Implementation Management. Proceedings of the Twentyfirst International Conference on Information Systems – ICIS 2000 (Dec. 10–13, Brisbane, Australia) (2000). pp. 197–205.Google Scholar
  26. Mangan, P. and Sadig, S. On Building Workflow Models for Flexible Processes. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Australasian Database Conference – ADC 2002 (Jan. 28-Feb. 1, Melbourne, Australia). ACM, N.Y. (2002). pp. 103–109.Google Scholar
  27. Mark, G. Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 11(3–4) (2002). pp. 349–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mentzas, G. and Halaris, C. Workflow on the Web: Integrating E-Commerce and Business Process Management. International Journal of E-Business Strategy Management 1, 2 (Nov./Dec. 1999). pp. 147–157.Google Scholar
  29. Nielsen, J. Usability Engineering. Academic Press, London, UK (1994).Google Scholar
  30. Orlikowski, W.J. The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organisations. Organisation Science 3, 3 (1992a). pp. 398–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Orlikowski, W.J. Learning from Notes: Organisational Issues in Groupware Implementation. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work – CSCW’92 (Oct. 31–Nov. 4, Toronto, Canada). ACM, N.Y. (1992b). pp. 362–369.Google Scholar
  32. Orlikowski, W.J. and Gash, D.C. Technological Frames: Making Sense of Information Technology in Organisations. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 12, 2 (Apr. 1994). pp. 174–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Piderit, S.K. Rethinking Resistance and Recognising Ambivallcence: A Multidimensional View of Attitudes Towards an Oranisational Change. Academy of Management Review 25, 4 (Oct. 2000). pp. 783–794.Google Scholar
  34. Preece, J., Rogers, Y. and Sharp, H. Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, NY (2002).Google Scholar
  35. Prescott, M.B. and Conger, S.A. Information Technology Innovations: A Classification by IT Locus of Impact and Research Approach. ACM SIGMIS Database 26, 2–3 (May/Aug. 1995). pp. 20–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robey, D. and Newman, M. Sequential Patterns in Information Systems Development: An Application of a Social Process Model. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems 14, 1 (Jan. 1996). pp. 30–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rogers, Y. Exploring Obstacles: Integrating CSCW in Evolving Organizations. T.W. Malone (ed.): Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Chapel Hill, USA, October 22–26 (1996). pp. 67–77.Google Scholar
  38. Saastamoinen, H.T. Exception-Based Approach for Information Systems Evaluation: The Method and its Benefits to Information Systems Management. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation 8 (1) (2005). pp. 51–60.Google Scholar
  39. Saastamoinen, H.T. Exception Handling in Information Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Jyväskylä Press (1995).Google Scholar
  40. Sarker, S. and Lee, A.S. Using a Positivist Case Research Methodology to Test Three Competing Theories-in-Use of Business Process Redesign. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 2, 7 (Jan. 2002).Google Scholar
  41. Schmidt, K. and Bannon, L. Taking CSCW Seriously: Supporting Articulation Work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: The Journal of Collaborative Computing 1, 1 (June 1992). pp. 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simone, C., Divitini, M. and Schmidt, K. A Notation for Malleable and Interoperable Coordination Mechanisms for CSCW Systems. Proceedings of Conference on Organisatinoal Computing Systems – COOCS’95 (Aug. 13–16, Milpitas, CA). ACM (1995). pp. 44–54.Google Scholar
  43. van der Aalst, W. and van Hee, K. Workflow Management: Models, Methods, and Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2001).Google Scholar
  44. WfMC. The Workflow Management Coalition – The Workflow Reference Model. Workflow Management Coalition Specification. Brussels, Belgium (1995). http://www.wfmc.org/standards/docs/tc003v11.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer London 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of MediaBauhaus-University WeimarWeimarGermany
  2. 2.Department of Business Information Management and LogisticsTampere University of TechnologyTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations