Skip to main content

Introduction: Reframing Humans and Information Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reframing Humans in Information Systems Development

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

Recent development of information and communication technologies (ICT) provides information systems (IS) designers with new potentialities to build systems for various purposes. The ongoing digital convergence refers to and discloses new views on the interactive reconfiguration of technological and social arrangements on a large scale in the contemporary society (Tilson et al. 2009). In addition to work-related activities, people use new technologies for increasingly diverse purposes, for example organizing their domestic affairs, for finding information and e-services, and for staying in touch with their friends and relatives (Lyytinen and Yoo 2002; Sørensen and Yoo 2005; Iivari et al. 2010). Different uses of IS can be classified to range from automation, support and mediation to informing, entertaining, artisticizing and accompanying (Iivari 2007). In addition to these seven “traditional” archetypes of IT applications, the emergence of ubiquitous computing and wearable computers supported by wireless technologies and distributed interfaces facilitates the design of innovative new applications for users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    There is a difference between user participation and user involvement in ISD. User participation often refers to the users’ conscious activies in ISD while user involvement may be passive or active (Barki and Hartwick 1994). User participation is consequently one mode of user involvement.

References

  • Abrahamsson, P. 2001. Rethinking the concept of commitment in software process improvement. Scandinavian journal of Information Systems, 13, 69–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M. 1995. User representations: Practices, methods and sociology. In Rip, A., Misa, T.J. and Schot, J. (Eds.) Managing technology in society. The approach of constructive technology assessment. London: Pinter Publishers, 167–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. & Fitzgerald, G. 2002. Information systems development: Methodologies, techniques and tools, Second Edition, London: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avison, D. & Fitzgerald, G. 2003. Where now for development methodologies? Communications of the ACM, 46, 78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barki, H. & Hartwick, J. 1994. Measuring user participation, user involvement, and user attitude. MIS Quarterly, 18(1), pp. 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. 1981. Systems thinking, systems practice. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. & Löwgren, J. 1997. Design for quality-in-use: Human–computer interaction meets information systems development. In: Helander, M., Landauer, T.K. and P. Prabhu (Eds.) Handbook of human–computer interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 299–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, T. & Pekkola, S. 2010. Three levels of failure: Analysing a workflow management system. In this book, chapter 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. 2006. Human factors, CHI, and MIS. In: P. Zhang and D. Galletta (Eds.) Human–computer interaction and management information systems: Foundations. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 402–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.K. & Lyytinen, K. 1995. Information systems development and data modeling. Conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. 1991. A Paradigmatic analysis of contemporary schools of IS development. European Journal of Information Systems, 1(4), 249–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. 2007. Paradigmatic analysis of information systems as a design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19, 39–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R. & H.K. Klein. 2001. A dynamic framework for classifying information systems development methodologies and approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), pp. 179–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R.A. & Klein, H.K. 2004. Towards a distinctive body of knowledge for information systems experts: Coding ISD process knowledge in two IS journals. Information Systems Journal, 14, 313–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. & Iivari, N. 2010. Varieties of user-centredness: an analysis of four systems development methods. Information Systems Journal (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J., Isomäki, H. & Pekkola, S. 2010. The user – the great unknown of systems development: Reasons, forms, challenges, experiences and intellectual contributions of user involvement. Information Systems Journal, 20(2), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomäki, H. & Pekkola. S. 2005. Nuances of human-centredness in information systems development. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences HICSS-38. Big Island, Hawaii: IEEE Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomäki, H. 2002. The prevailing conceptions of the human being in information systems development: Systems designers’ reflections. Computer Science Department, University of Tampere, Finland, Ph.D. Thesis, June 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isomäki, H. 2007. Different levels of information systems designers’ forms of thought and potential for human-centred design. International Journal of Technology Human Interaction, 31, 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskinen, M., Liimatainen, K. & Pekkola, S. 2005. Human orientation in Scandinavian IS research as it appears in SJIS. In: Hustad, E., Munkvold, B.E., Rolland, K. and Flak, L.S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 28th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia (IRIS’28). Kristiansand, Norway August 6–9 2005. Agder University College, Department of Information Systems, CD-ROM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb, R. & Kling. R. 2003. Reconceptualizing users as social actors in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 197–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, C. 2003. From the shadows: Users as designers, producers, marketers, distributors, and technical support. In: Oudshoorn, N. and Pinch, T. (Eds.) How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyytinen, K. & Yoo, Y. 2002. Issues and challenges in Ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM, 45 (12), 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M.L. & Mao, J.-Y. 2004. Participation in development and implementation – updating an old, tired concept for today’s IS contexts. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 5, 11–12, 514–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurminen, M. I. & Forsman, U. 1994. Reversed quality life cycle model. In: Bradley, G.E. and Hendrick H.W. (Eds.) Human factors in organizational design and management IV. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 393–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurminen, M.I. 1988. People or computers: Three ways of looking at information systems. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pain, D., Owen, J., Franklin, I. & Green, E. 1993. Human-centred systems design: A review of trends within the broader systems development context. In: Green, E., Owen, J. and Pain, D. (Eds.) Gendered by design? Information technology and office systems. London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Päivärinta, T. & Pekkola, S. 2003. Structurational approach to studying research and practice of information systems development. In: The JAIS sponsored theory development workshop (after ICIS 2003). Seattle, WA, USA, December 14–17, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Päivärinta, T., Sein, M.K. & Peltola, T. 2010. From ideals towards practice: Paradigmatic mismatches and drifts in method deployment. Information Systems Journal, 20(5), 481–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkola, S. 2003. Designed for unanticipated use: Common artefacts as design principle for CSCW applications. In: Pendergast, M., Schmidt, K., Simone, C. and Tremaine M. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP’03). Sanibel Island, FL: ACM Press, November 9–12, 2003, pp. 359–368.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pekkola, S., Kaarilahti, N. & Pohjola P. 2006. Towards formalised end-user participation in information systems development process: Bridging the gap between participatory design and ISD methodologies. In: 2006 Participatory Design Conference (PDC 2006). Trento, Italy: ACM Press, August 1–5, 2006, pp. 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. 1993. Design for unanticipated use… In: de Michelis, G., Simone, C., and Schmidt, K. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Computer Supported cooperative Work (ECSCW’93). Kluwer, New York, 1993. pp. 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, K. & Bannon, L. 1992. Taking CSCW seriously: Supporting articulation work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 1, 1–2, 7–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1997. Human computer factors: A study of users and information systems. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, C. & Yoo, Y. 2005. Socio-technical studies of mobility and ubiquity. In Proceedings of IFIP WG 8.2, Cleveland, OH, USA, Springer, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilson, D., Lyytinen, K. & Sørensen, C. 2009. Desperately seeking the Infrastructure in IS Research: Conceptualization of “Digital Convergence” as the co-evolution of social and technical infrastructures. In: Isomäki, H., Häkkinen, P. and Viteli, J. (Eds.) Future educational technologies. Reports of Information Technology Research Institute 20/2009. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä Printing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuojärvi, H., Isomäki, H. & Hynes, D. 2010. Domestication of a laptop on a wireless university campus: A case study. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 250–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. 1991. Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In: Law, J. (Ed.) A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, P., Carey, J., Te’eni, D. & Tremaine, M. 2005. Integrating human–computer interaction development into the systems development life cycle: A methodology. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 512–543.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannakaisa Isomäki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Isomäki, H., Pekkola, S. (2010). Introduction: Reframing Humans and Information Systems. In: Isomäki, H., Pekkola, S. (eds) Reframing Humans in Information Systems Development. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-347-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-347-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-346-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-347-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics