Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Research Practices in Digital Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Exploring Digital Design

Part of the book series: Computer Supported Cooperative Work ((CSCW))

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, we are literally surrounded by digital things and things that turn out to be digital – or have some digital parts or are parts of a larger system in which there are digital elements. We carry around mobile phones and watches; many also have additional music players, PDAs or PCs. We live in houses filled with digital networks and artefacts; we depend on infrastructures that are partly digital and have digital systems attached to them; we use public and private services that are digital, are based on digital infrastructures and have other digital systems attached to them; and we experience embedded, ubiquitous computing as we live in digitally enhanced environments that support our activities with or without our conscious control. The digital layer(s) in the world constitute a real world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The media track has been selected and a video on media with accompanying text is served. The text has links from this choreography and digital scenography workshop session to a final performance. Available: http://imweb.uio.no/ballectro/

  2. 2.

    For further details on RECORD, please see: http://www.recordproject.org/index.php/about/

References

  • Abowd, G.D., Atkeson, C.G., Hong, J., Long, S., Kooper, R., & Pinkerton, M. (1997). Cyberguide: a mobile context-aware tour guide. Wireless Networks, 3(5), 421–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N.E., Kensing, F., Lassen, M., Lundin, J., Mathiassen, L., Munk-Madsen, A. et al. (1990). Professional systems development: Experiences, ideas, and action. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R., Ruland, C. M., Røslien, J., & Slaughter, L. (2005). Clustering techniques for organizing cancer-related concepts into meaningful groups for patients. Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association, October 2005, 882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angliss, S. (2006a). Talking sense. Museum Practice Magazine, 34, 46–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angliss, S. (2006b). Sound and vision. Museum Practice Magazine, 34, 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1995). Sketching and the psychology of design. In V. Margolin & R. Buchanan (Eds.), The idea of design: A design issues reader (pp. 70-74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannon, L., Benford, S., Bowers, J., & Heath, C. (Eds. 2005). Hybrid design creates innovative museum experiences. Communications of the ACM, 48(3), 62–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudisch, P. (2006). Interacting with large displays. IEEE Computer, 39(3), 96–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benford, S., Crabtree, A., Reeves, S., Sheridan, J., Dix, A., Flintham, M., et al. (2006). Designing for the opportunities and risks of staging digital experiences in public settings. In R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries & G. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’06) (pp. 427–436). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, E., Mörtberg, C., & Jansson, M. (2005). Emphasizing technology: sociotechnical implications. Information Technology and People, 18(4), 343–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyene, T., Hinds, P. J., & Cramton, C. D. (2009). Walking through jelly: language proficiency and disrupted meaning making in internationally distributed work, HBS working papers No. 09-138, Harvard Business School. http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/09-138.pdf.

  • Bjerknes, G., & Bratteteig, T. (1987a). Florence in wonderland. System development with nurses. In G. Bjerknes, P. Ehn & M. Kyng (Eds.), Computers and democracy. A Scandinavian challenge (pp. 279–296). Aldershot: Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G., & Bratteteig, T. (1988a). The memoirs of two survivors – or evaluation of a computer system for cooperative work. In I. Greif (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work, Portland, Oregon, USA (pp. 167–177). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G., & Bratteteig, T. (1988b). Computers – utensils or epaulets? The application perspective revisited. AI & Society, 2(3), 258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G., & Bratteteig, T. (1995). User participation and democracy. A discussion of Scandinavian research on system development. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 7(1), 73-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerknes, G., Bratteteig, T., & Espeseth, T. (1991). Evolution of finished computer systems: the dilemma of enhancement. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 3, 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, J. (2003), Critical theory and the challenge of new media. In M. Hocks & M. Kendrick (Eds.), Eloquent images: Word and image in the age of new media (pp. 19–36). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, F., & Enderud, H. (1981). Konflikter i organisationer: Belyst ved studier af edb-systemarbejde (Conflicts in organizations: Illuminated through studies of IT systems development, in Danish). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, J., & Pycock, J. (1994). Talking through design: requirements and resistance in cooperative prototyping. In B. Adelson, S. Dumais & J. Olson (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: Celebrating interdependence, Boston, Mass, United States (pp. 299–305). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA/London/England: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, S. (1995). How buildings learn: What happens after they’re built. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig, T. (1997). Mutual Learning. Enabling cooperation in systems design. In Braa, K., Monteiro, E. (eds): Proceedings of IRIS’20. (pp. 1-20) Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig, T. (2002). Bringing gender issues to technology design. In C. Floyd, G. Kelkar, S. Klein-Franke, C. Kramarae & C. Limpangog (Eds.), Feminist challenges in the information age (pp. 91-105). Germany: Verlag Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig, T. (2004a). Making change. Dealing with relations between design and use. Diss. Oslo: Department of Informatics, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig, T. (2004b). Participatory design in present society. Invited keynote speech, Participatory Design Conference 2004, Toronto, July 27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig, T. (2008). Design research in informatics: a comment to Iivari. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 20 (1), 65–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratteteig, T., & Stolterman, E. (1997). Design in groups – and all that jazz. In M. Kyng, & L. Mathiassen (Eds.), Computers and design in context (pp. 289–316). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1994). Borderline issues social and material aspects of design. Human-Computer Interaction, 9(1), 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L.L. (1994). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1995). Wicked problems in design thinking. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), The idea of design: A design issues reader (pp. 3–20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Button, G., & Sharrock, W., (1994). Occasioned practices in the work of software engineers. In M. Jirotka & J. A. Goguen (Eds.), Requirements engineering: Social and technical issues (pp. 217–240). San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, B. (2006). Sketching user experiences: Getting the design right and the right design. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, K., Kensing, F., & Simonsen, J. (2004). Participatory IT design. Designing for business and workplace realities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bødker, S., & Andersen, P.-B. (2005). Complex mediation. Human-Computer Interaction, 20(4), 353–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, S. (2007). Tagging and searching: Serendipity and museum collection databases. In J. Trant & D. Bearman (Eds.), Proceedings museums and the Web 2007 April 11-14, San Fransisco, California. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2007/papers/chan/chan.html

  • Ciolfi, L., & Bannon, L. (2005). Space, place and the design of technologically enhanced physical environments. In P. Turner, E. Davenport (Eds.), Space, spatiality and technology (pp. 217–232). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (1999). The inmates are running the asylum: [Why high-tech products drive us crazy and how to restore the sanity]. Indianapolis, IN: Sams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (Ed.). (1984). Developments in design methodology. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1994). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1995). Discovering design ability. In R. Buchanan & V. Margolin (Eds.), Discovering design (pp. 105–119). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (2007). Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N., Christiaans, H., & Dorst, K. (1996). Analysing design activity. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Michelis, G. (2009). The phenomenological stance of the designer. In T. Binder, J. Löwgren & L. Malmborg (Eds.), (Re)Searching the digital bauhaus. (pp. 145–162). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dindler, C., Eriksson, E., Iversen, O. S., Ludvigsen, M., & Lykke-Olesen, A. (2005). Mission from mars: a method for exploring user requirements for children in a narrative space. In M. Eisenberg & A. Eisenberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Interaction design and children (IDC ’05), Boulder, Colorado (pp. 40–47). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djajadiningrat, J. P., Overbeeke, C. J., & Wensveen, S. A. G. (2000). Augmenting fun and beauty: a pamphlet. In W. E. Mackay (Ed.), Proceedings of DARE 2000 on designing augmented reality environments, Elsinore, Denmark (pp. 131–134). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2003). Implications for design. In R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries & G. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘06), Montréal, Québec, Canada (pp. 541–550). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druin, A. (Ed.). (1999a). The design of children’s technology. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Druin, A. (1999b). Cooperative inquiry: developing new technologies for children with children. In M.G. Williams & M. W. Alton (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems: The CHI is the limit (CH’99), Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States (pp. 592–599). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. (1989). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P. (2006). Participation in interaction design: actors and artefacts in interaction. In S. Bagnara, & G. Crampton Smith (Eds.), Theories and practice in interaction design (pp. 137–154). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehn, P., & Löwgren, J. (2003). Searching voices: Towards a canon for interaction design. Studies in arts and communication 01. Malmö: The School of Arts and Communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, J., & Dierking, L. (2008). Learning with digital technologies. In L. Tallon, & K. Walker (Eds.). Digital technologies and the museum experience: Handheld guides and other media. Alta Mira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallman, D. (2008). The interaction design research triangle of design practice, design studies, and design exploration. Design Issues, 24(3), 4–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farringdon, J., Moore, A. J., Tilbury, N., Church, J., & Biemond, P. D. (1999). Wearable sensor badge and sensor jacket for context awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC ‘99) (pp. 107). Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishwick, P. (Ed.). (2006). Aesthetic computing. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frascara, J. (2004). Communication design: Principles, methods and practice. New York: Allworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser, L. (1986). The integration of computing and routine work. ACM Transactions on Office Information, 4(3), 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaccardi, E., & Fischer, G. (2008). Creativity and evolution: a metadesign perspective. Digital Creativity, 19(1), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, P. (2003). What is generative art? Complexity theory as a context for art theory. In Proceedings of generative Art 2003. 9-13 December. Milan, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, H., Insulander, E., & Simonsson, H. (2004). Access in mind: enhancing the relationship to contemporary art. In Proceedings from digital culture and heritage (ICHIM’04), Aug. 31–Sept. 02, Berlin. http://www.archimuse.com/publishing/ichim_04.html

  • Greenbaum, J., & Kyng, M. (Eds.). (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, N J: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, R.E. (1996). Supporting articulation work using software configuration management systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5(4), 447–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, R. E. (1997). Doing software development: occasions for automation and formalisation. In J. A. Hughes, W. Prinz, T. Rodden & K. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the fifth conference on European conference on computer-supported cooperative work (ECSCW’97) Lancaster, UK (pp. 173–188). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, R. E. (1998). Recomposition: putting it all back together again. In I. Greif (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW ’98) Seattle Washington, USA (pp. 393–403). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinter, R. E. (2003). Recomposition: coordinating a web of software dependencies. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12(3), 297–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grudin, J. (1988). Why CSCW Applications Fail: problems in the design and evaluation of organizational interfaces. In I. Greif (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1988 ACM conference on computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW’88) Portland, Oregon, United States (pp. 85–93). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutwin, C., & Fedak, C. (2004). Interacting with big interfaces on small screens: a comparison of fisheye, zoom, and panning techniques. In Proceedings of graphics interface. London, Ontario, Canada (pp. 145–152). Waterloo, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Human-Computer Communications Society, School of Computer Science, University of Waterloo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, T., & Bannon, L. (2006). Designing ubiquitous computing to enhance children’s learning in museums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22 (4), 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardenborg, N. (2007). Designing work and IT systems: A participatory process that supports usability and sustainability. Diss. Uppsala: Department of Information Systems, University of Uppsala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K. (1995). The visual culture of engineers. In S. L. Star (Ed.), The cultures of computing (pp. 197–218). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, K. (1999). On line and on paper: Visual representations, visual culture, and computer graphics in design engineering. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P.J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of synch: understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14, 615–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, P.J., & McGrath, C. (2006). Structures that work: social structure, work structure and coordination ease in geographically distributed teams. In P. Hinds & D. Martin (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work (CSCW’06), Banff, Alberta, Canada (pp. 343–352). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornecker, E. (2004). Tangible user interfaces als kooperationsunterstützendes medium. Diss. Bremen: Staats und Universitätsbibliothek Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornecker, E. (2005). A design theme for tangible interaction: embodied facilitation. In H. Gellersen, K. Schmidt, M. Beaudouin-Lafon & M. Mackay (Eds.), Proceedings of the ninth conference on European conference on computer supported cooperative work (ECSCW’05), Paris, France (pp. 437–446). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornecker, E., & J. Buur (2006). Getting a grip on tangible interaction: a framework on physical space and social interaction. In R. Grinter, T. Rodden, P. Aoki, E. Cutrell, R. Jeffries & G. Olsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’06) Montréal, Québec, Canada. (pp. 437–446). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsi, S., & Fait, H. (2005). RFID enhances visitors’ museum experience at the exploratorium. [Special issue]Communications of the ACM, 48 (9), 60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, H., Mackay, W., Westerlund, B., Benderson, B. B., Druin, A., Plaisant, C., et al. (2003). Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In G. Cockton & P. Korhonen (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘03), Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA (pp. 17–24). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämäläinen, P., Höysniemi, J., Ilmonen, T., Lindholm, M., & Nykänen, A. (2005). Martial arts in artificial reality. In G. Van der Veer, C. Gale, W. Kellogg & S. Zhai (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’05) Portland, Oregon (pp. 781–790). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imsland, V., Sahay, S., & Wartiainen, Y. (2003). Key issues in managing a global software outsourcing relationship between a Norwegian and a Russion firm: some practical implications. Proceedings of IRIS’26, Haikko, Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., Mazalek, A., & Lee, J. (2001). Bottles as a minimal interfaces to access digital information. In J. Jacko & A Sears (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘01), Seattle, Washington (pp. 187–188). New York: ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In S. Pemberton (Ed.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ‘97), Georgia, United States (pp. 234–241). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M. (2003). Mobile phones, Japanese youth, and the re-placement of social contact. In R. Harper, L. Palen, A. Taylor (Eds.), Inside the text: Social perspectives on SMS. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, O. S., & Nielsen, C. (2003). Using digital cultural probes in design with children. In S. MacFarlane, T. Nicol, J. Read & L. Snape (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 conference on interaction design and children (IDC ‘03), Preston, UK (pp. 154). Ney York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacucci, G., & Wagner, I. (2007). Performative roles of materiality for collective creativity. In B. Schneiderman, G. Fischer, E. Giaccardi & M. Eisenberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity & cognition (C&C ’07), Washington, DC, USA (pp. 73–82). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, M. (2007). Participation, knowledges and experiences: Design of IT-systems in e-home health care. Diss. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J. F. (1998). Interactivity. Tracking a new concept in media and communication studies. Nordicom Review, 19(1), 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahr-Højland, A. (2006). Changing paradigms within museum exhibitions: the use of mobile technologies within semi-formal learning settings. In NODEM 06. Oslo 7.-9. December 2006. http://www.tii.se/nodem/06/nw_06/papers/papers.htm.

  • Kanstrup, A.M., Bertelsen, P., Glasemann, M., & Boye, N. (2008). Design for more: an ambient perspective on diabetes. In Proceedings of participatory design conference 2008 Indiana Bloomington (pp. 118–127). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krystad, S. (1997). EDB-støtte for designprosessen: Et eksempel fra klesdesign (IT support for the design process: An example from clothing design, in Norwegian). Diss. Oslo: Dept. of Information Technology, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyng, M. (1991). Designing for cooperation – cooperating in design. Communications of the ACM, 34(12), 64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larssen, A., Robertson, T., & Edwads, J. (2007). The feel dimension of technology interaction: exploring tangibles through movement and touch. In B. Ullmer & A. Schmidt (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st international conference on tangible and embedded interaction (TEI’07), Baton Rouge: Louisiana (pp. 271–278). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larssen, A. T. (2004). Physical computing – representations of human movements in human-computer interaction. Computer Human Interaction, Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larssen, A.T. Robertson, T., Loke, L., & Edwards, J. (2006). Introduction to the special issue on movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 607-608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). Visualization and cognition: Thinking with eyes and hands. Knowledge and Society: Studies in Sociology of Culture Past and Present, 6, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillau, Y., & Paternò, F. (2004). Supporting museum co-visits using mobile devices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3160/2004, 451–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice, perspectives on activity and context. (pp. 3–32) New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. legitimate peripheral learning. New Yersey: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (1997). How designers think. The design process demystified. Oxford: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2007). What designers know. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Bichard, J-A. (2008). ‘Teen-scape’: designing participations for the design excluded. In Proceedings of participatory design conference 2008 Indiana Bloomington (pp. 128–137). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (2005). Place, pace, and meaning: multimedia chronotopes. In S. Norris & R. Jones (Eds.), Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis (pp. 110–122). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, P. (2007). Metamorphing – The transformative power of digital media and tangible interaction. Diss. Karlskrona: Blekinge Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindley, C. (2005). The semiotics of time structure in ludic space as a foundation for analysis and design. Game Studies, 5(1) http://www.gamestudies.org/0501/lindley/

  • Loke, L., Larssen, A. T., & Robertson, T. (2005). Labanotation for design of movement-based interaction. In Y. Pisan (Ed.), Proceedings of the second Australian conference on Interactive entertainment (pp. 113–120). Sydney, Australia: Creativity & Cognition Studios Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luyten, K., Van Loon, H., Gabriels, K., Teunkens, D., Robert, K., Coninx, K., et al (2006). ARCHIE; Designing for interaction – socially-aware museum handheld guides. In NODEM’06, http://www.tii.se/nodem/06/nw_06/papers/loon.htm

  • Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manovich, L. (2003). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, R., & Silverstone, R. (1996). Communication by design: The politics of communication and information technologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maquil, V., Psik, T., Wagner, I., & Wagner, M. (2007). Expressive interactions supporting collaboration in urban design. In T. Gross & K. Inkpen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 international ACM conference on supporting group work (Group 2007), Sanibel Island, Forida, USA (pp. 69–78). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maquil, V., Psik, T., & Wagner, I. (2008). The colortable: a design story. In A. Schmidt, H. Gellersen, E. Van den Hoven, A. Mazalek, P. Hollies & N. Villar (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction (TEI’08) Bonn, Germany (pp. 97–104). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti, P. (2006). The evolution of the concept of participation in design. keynote lecture at PDC 2006, August 1-5 2006, Trento, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiassen, L. (1981). Systemudvikling og Systemudviklingsmetode. Diss. Aarhus: Dept. of Datalogy (DAIMI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignonneau, L., & Sommerer, C. (2003). From the poesy of programming to research as an art form. In G. Stocker & S. Schöpf (Eds.), CODE- The language of our time (pp. 242–249). Osterfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, E. Y. (2006). Evaluation of children’s usability criteria. Masters thesis Oslo: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moggridge, B. (2007). Designing interactions. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. (Ed.). (2010). Inside multimodal composition. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., & Eikenes, J.-O. (2008). The times are a-changing in the interface. Paper presented at International Conference on Multimodality and Learning: New Perspectives on Knowledge, Representation and Communication, University of London, 19-20 June 2008, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., Skjulstad, S., & Smørdal, O. (2004). Choreographing augmented space. In Proceedings of futureground international conference 2004 Vol 2. Mebourne: Monash University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., Sem, I., & Havnør, M. (2010). Behind the wallpaper: Multimodal performativity in mixed reality arts. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Inside multimodal composition. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphie, A. (2003). Negotiating presence: performance and new technologies. In P. Auslander (Ed.), Performance: Critical concepts in literary and cultural studies Vol 4. (pp. 351–364). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mörtberg, C. (1997). ‘Det beror på att man är kvinna …’ Gränsvandrerskor formas och formar informationsteknologi [“It’s because one is a woman...” Transgressors are shaped and shape information technology]. Diss. Luleå: Luleå University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mörtberg, C. (2001). Abstracting, quantifying, classifying, simplyfying, standardising, building hierachies: what are the systems designers sorting out? In Proceedings of the conference information technology, transnational democracy and gender, Nov. 17, Ronneby, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mörtberg, C., & Stuedahl, D. (2005). Silences and sensibilities: increasing participation in IT design. In O. W. Bertelsen, N. O. Bouvin, P. G. Krogh & M. Kyng (Eds.), Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on critical computing: Between sense and sensibility, Aarhus, Denmark (pp. 141–144). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghsh, A.M., Bratteteig, T., Danielsson, K., Blomberg, J., Fischer, G., & Nocera, J.A.. (2008). Distributed-PD: challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of participatory design conference 2008 Indiana Bloomington (panel) (pp. 290–291). New York, Ny, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardi, B., & Whittaker, S. (2002). NetWORKers and their activity in intensional networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1/2), 205–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. (1998). Here, there, and nowhere at all: distribution, negotiation, and virtuality in postmodern ethnography and engineering. Knowledge and Society, 11, 235–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Boston: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability. Berkeley: Peachpit Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, K. (1996). “Those Were the Days”? Or “Heroic Times Are Here Again”? IRIS Opening speech 10. August 1996. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 8(2), 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, K., & Bergo, O.T. (1975). Planlegging, styring og databehandling (Planning, management and computing). Oslo: Tiden Norsk Forlag & Arbeidernes opplysningsforbund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oritsland, T.A., & Buur, J. (2000). An aesthetic sense of direction in interface design. In Proceedings of the first nordic conference on human-computer interaction, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patten, J., Ishii, H. (2000). A Comparison of Spatial Organization Strategies in Graphical and Tangible User Interfaces. In W. E. Mackay (Ed.), Proceedings of DARE 2000 on designing augmented reality environments (DARE ’00), Elsinore, Denmark (pp. 41–50). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philipose, M., Fishkin, K.P., Perkowitz, M., Patterson, D.J., Fox, D., Kautz, H. & Hahnel, D. (2004). Inferring Activities from Interactions with Objects. In IEEE Pervasive Computing, 3 (4), 50–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poppenpohl, S. (2006). Interaction as an ecology. Building a framework. In S. Bagnara & G. Crampton Smith (Eds.), Theories and practice in interaction design (pp. 287–299). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, C., & Catledge, L. (1996). Collaborative conceptual design: a large software project case study. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 5(4), 415–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proctor, N., & Tellis, C. (2003). The state of the art in museum handhelds in 2003. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2003/papers/proctor/proctor.html

  • Prøitz, L. (2007). The mobile phone turn. A study of gender, sexuality and subjectivity in young people’s mobile phone practices. Diss. Oslo: Faculty of Humanities, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reas, C., & Fry, B. (2006). On generative systems? In P. Fishwick (Ed.), Aesthetic computing (pp. 197–226). Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, M. (2003). The poetics of interactivity: the uncertaintly principle. In M. Reiser, A. Zapp (Eds.), Rieser, Martin & Zapp, Andrea (Eds.), New screen media: Cinema/art/narrative. London: British Film Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T. (1997). Designing over distance: A study of cooperative work, embodied cognition and technology to enable remote collaboration. Diss. Sydney: Dept. of Information Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P., & Keyson, D.V. (2007). The case of sculpting atmospheres: towards design principles for expressive tangible interaction in control of ambient systems. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(2), 69–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruland, C. M. (2008). Personal communication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruland, C. M., Slaughter, L., Starren, J., & Vatne, T. M. (2006). Children as design partners in the development of a support system for children with cancer. Studies in Health technology & Informatics, 122, 80–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruland, C. M., Slaughter, L., Starren, J., Vatne, T. M., & Moe, E. Y. (2007). Children’s contributions to designing a communication tool for children with cancer. In Proceedings of international medical information association (IMIA) medinfo congress (pp. 977–82), August 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruland C. M., Starren, J., Vatne, T. (2008). Participatory design with children in the development of a support system for patient-centered care in pediatric oncology. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, Aug 41(4), 624–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo, A., & Watkins, J. (2006). Social media effect (on) museum communication. NODEM’06, Oslo University 7.-9. December.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.tii.se/nodem/06/nw_06/papers/papers.htm

  • Sahay, S., Nicholson, B., & Krishna, S. (2003). Managing global software alliances. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salgado, M. (2008). Breaking apart participation in museums. In J. Trant & D. Bearman (Eds.), Museums and the web 2008, Proceedings, Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics.

    Google Scholar 

  • http://www.archimuse.com/mw2008/papers/salgado/salgado.html

  • Schmidt, K., & Wagner, I. (2004). Ordering systems. Coordinating practices and artefacts in architectural design and planning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13(5–6), 349–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sending, V. A. C. (2006). En kvalitativ undersøkelse av elementer som motiverer barn til å bruke et diagnostiseringssystem, Masters thesis. Oslo: Dept. of Informatics, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sha, X. W., Kuzmanovic, M. (2000). From representation to performance: responsive public space. In Proceedings of shaping the network society (DIAC 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjulstad, S. (2007a). Clashing constructs in web design. In A. Melberg (Ed.), Aesthetics at work (pp. 81–103). Oslo: UniPub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjulstad, S. (2007b). Communication design and motion graphics on the web. Journal of Media Practice, 8(3), 359–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjulstad, S. & Morrison, A. (2005). Movement in the interface. Computers and Composition, 22(4), 413–433. Doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2005.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skjulstad, S., Morrison, A., & Aaberge, A. (2002). Researching performance, performing research: dance, multimedia and learning. In A. Morrison (Ed.), Researching ICTs in context (pp. 211-248). Oslo: Intermedia/UniPub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparacino, F., Davenport, G., Pentland, A. (2000). Media in performance: interactive spaces for dance, theater, circus, and museum exhibits. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3 & 4), 479–510. Available online http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj39-34.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, D., Bayon, V., & Neale, H. (2001). Classrom collaboration in the design of tangible interfaces for story telling. In M. (Mantei) Tremaine (Ed.), Proceedings of conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI ’01), Seattle, Washington, United States (pp. 482–489),. New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star S. L., & Strauss, A. (1999). Layers of silence, arenas of voice: the ecology of visible and invisible work. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 8(1-2), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolterman, E. (1991). Designarbetets dolda rationalitet – en studie av metodik och praktik inom systemutveckling, Diss. Umeå: Department of Informatics, University of Umeå.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuedahl, D. (2004). Forhandlinger og overtalelser. Kunnskapsbygging på tvers av kunnskapstradisjoner i brukermedvirkende design av ny IKT (Negotiations and persuations. Knowledge building crossing knowledge traditions in user participation in design of new ICT, in Norwegian). Diss. Oslo: InterMedia, Faculty of Education, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tapia, E.M.; Intille, S.S., & Larson, K. (2004). Activity recognition in the home setting using simple and ubiquitous sensors. Proceedings of PERVASIVE 2004, vol. LNCS 3001 (pp. 158–175). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellioglu, H., & Wagner, I. (2001). Work practices surrounding PACS. The Politics of space in Hospitals. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 10(2), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackara, J. (2005). In the bubble: Designing in a complex world. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoresen, K. (1997). Simple, but cumbersome. In I. McClelland, G. Olson, G. Van der Veer, A. Henderson & S. Coles (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd conference on designing interactive systems: Processes, practices, methods, and techniques (DIS ’97), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (pp. 385–394). New York: ACM press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trant, J. (2006) Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums: proof of concept. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 12(1), 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ullmer, B., Ishii, H. (2000). Emerging frameworks for tangible user interfaces. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3-4), 915–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Velden, M., Bratteteig, T., Finken, S., & Mörtberg, C. (2009). Autonomy and automation in an information society for all. In J. Molka-Danielsen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 32nd information systems research seminar in Scandinavia, IRIS 32, Inclusive Design, Molde University College, Molde, Norway, August 9-12, 2009. ISBN 978-82-7962-120-1.

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Lehn, D., & Heath, C. (2005). Accounting for new technology in museum exhibitions. International Journal of Arts Management, 7(3), 11–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Lehn, D., Heath, C., & Hindmarsh, J. (2005). Rethinking interactivity: design for participation in museums and galleries. In Ciolfi, L., Cooke, M., Hall, T., Bannon, L.J. and Oliva, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop on rethinking technology in museums. Limerick: University of Limerick, Ireland 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, I. (2000). Persuasive artefacts in architectural design and planning. Nottingham: CoDesigning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, I., & Lainer, R. (2003). Designing a visual 3D interface – a reflection on methods. ACM Interactions Magazine, X/6, Nov/Dec 2003, 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, I., Kompast, M., & Lainer, R. (2002). Visualization strategies for the design of interactive navigable 3D worlds. ACM Interactions Magazine, IX 5, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J. (2003). Fiction and interaction: how clicking on a mouse can make you part of a digital world. Diss. Bergen: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, K. (2007). Visitor-constructed personalized learning trails. In Proceedings of museums and the Web 2007, the international conference for culture and heritage online, 11-14 April 2007, San Francisco, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. (Ed.). (1996). Bringing design to software. New York: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M., Richards, B., & Baecker, R. (2004). Participatory design with individuals who have amnesia. In Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices Toronto, Ontario, Canada (pp. 214–223). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, G-Z. (Ed.). (2006). Body sensor networks. London: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Tone Bratteteig & Christina Mörtberg

  2. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria

    Ina Wagner

  3. Oslo School of Architecture and Design, Oslo, Norway

    Andrew Morrison

  4. Department of Media and Communication, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

    Dagny Stuedahl

Authors
  1. Tone Bratteteig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ina Wagner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andrew Morrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dagny Stuedahl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Christina Mörtberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst. Gestaltungs- und, Wirkungsforschung, TU Wien, Argentinierstr. 8, Wien, 1040, Austria

    Ina Wagner

  2. Dept. Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0316, Norway

    Tone Bratteteig

  3. Dept. Media & Communication, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0317, Norway

    Dagny Stuedahl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bratteteig, T., Wagner, I., Morrison, A., Stuedahl, D., Mörtberg, C. (2010). Research Practices in Digital Design. In: Wagner, I., Bratteteig, T., Stuedahl, D. (eds) Exploring Digital Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-223-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-223-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-222-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-223-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation