Advertisement

How Creative Groups Structure Tasks Through Negotiating Resources

  • Christopher Paul MiddupEmail author
  • Tim Coughlan
  • Peter Johnson
Conference paper

Abstract

Creative collaborations are a complex, yet common phenomenon. In this paper we introduce a model that describes the development of a creative outcome by a group, based on its efforts to structure the task through the exploration and adoption of concepts and artefacts. We use our model as a basis to analyse a collaborative filmmaking study. Through this, we show how the model is an effective tool for describing the actions of the group as its members work towards producing an outcome. We conclude that the model could be utilised as a tool for recognising patterns in creative collaborations, for understanding support needs, and for comparing instances of these tasks.

Keywords

Video Clip Negotiation Process Wicked Problem Creative Task Collaborative Task 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Baer, J.: Evaluative Thinking, Creativity, and Task Specificity, In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical Creative Processes. Hampton Press, USA, pp. 129–151 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boden, M. A.: The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. Abacus Books, London (1993).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coughlan, T., Johnson P.: An Exploration of Constraints and End User Development in Environments for Creative Tasks, International Journal of Human Computer Interaction. Vol. 24, Issue 5. 444–459 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coughlan, T., Johnson, P.: Interaction in creative tasks: Ideation, representation and evaluation in composition. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, pp. 531–540 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gabora, L: Cognitive mechanisms underlying the creative process. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Creativity and Cognition. ACM Press, New York, pp. 126–133 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    González, M.G., Burke, M.J., Santuzzi, A.M., Bradley, J.C.: The impact of group process variables on the effectiveness of distance collaboration groups, Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 19, 629–648 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lieberman, H., Paternò, F. & Wulf, V.: End User Development, Springer, Berlin (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Middup, C.P., Johnson, P.: Modeling Group Artifact Adoption for Awareness in Activity-focused Co-located Meetings, Proc. 6th Int. Workshop on Tasks Models and Diagrams, Toulouse, France (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norman, D. A. The design of everyday things. Doubleday, New York (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pérez y Pérez, R., Sharples, M.: MEXICA: A computer model of a cognitive account of creative writing. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13(2), 119–139 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M.: Planning Problems are Wicked Problems, in Cross, N. (Ed.) Developments in Design Methodology, Wiley, New York, pp. 135–144. (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sarmiento, J. W., Stahl, G.: Group Creativity in Virtual Math Teams: Interaction Mechanisms for Referencing, Bridging and Remembering, Proc. Creativity and Cognition, ACM Press, New York, pp. 37–44 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sawyer, R. K.: Group Creativity: Music, Theatre, Collaboration. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schön, D. A., Educating the Reflective Practitioner, Josey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simon, H.A.: Models of man - social and rational, Wiley, New York (1957)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stokes, P.: Creativity from Constraints: The Psychology of Breakthrough, Springer, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sundstrom, E., De Meuse, K.P., Futrell, D.: Work Teams: Applications and Effectiveness, American Psychologist, Vol. 45, Issue 2, 120–133 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher Paul Middup
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tim Coughlan
    • 1
  • Peter Johnson
    • 1
  1. 1.HCI Group, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of BathBathUK

Personalised recommendations