Skip to main content

Towards a Robust Process for Integrating Innovations into Vehicle Projects

  • Conference paper
Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes

Abstract

No matter which car maker is observed, it appears that very few innovations actually find their way into vehicle development projects, compared to the number of ideas originally imagined. Although it is normal practice to filter out many innovations, it is essential to maintain a certain number within the vehicle development projects. Otherwise there is a risk of not being able to keep up with market expectations or of being out of step with the competitors’ market offerings. This difficulty of transforming good ideas into innovations that find their place in vehicle development projects may be attributed to the difficulty in converging innovation development with vehicle development, a process that we shall refer to in the rest of this article as the “touch-down” process (Buet et al., 2008). This term stems from an analogy that may be made with an aircraft (innovation projects) landing on an aircraft-carrier (vehicle development projects). While landing, it is essential to specify all the conditions required, to apply all defined processes, but also to know how to react to events in order to make a successful “touch-down”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akao Y (1990) Quality function deployment - integrating customer requirements into product design. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard V (2009) Intrapreneuriat - innovation et croissance: Entreprendre dans l'entreprise. Dunod, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2008) Design thinking, Harvard Business Review, 86(5): 84-92

    Google Scholar 

  • Buet G, Gidel T, Millet T (2008) New technologies “touch down process”. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering (IDMME 2008), Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalupnik MJ, Wynn DC, Eckert CM, Clarkson PJ (2007) Understanding design process robustness: A modelling approach. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’07), Paris, France, pp 455-456

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough H (2006) Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Chvidchenko I, Chevalier J (1997) Conduite et gestion de projets. Cédapuès Editions, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia R, Calantone R (2002) A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. The Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19: 110-132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giard V, Midler C (1993) Pilotages de projet et enterprises. Economica, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Gidel T, Zonghero W (2006) Management de projet 2: Approfondissements. Hermes Science Publications, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn T, Binz H (2009) A highly flexible project maturity management method for the early phase of product development. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’09), Stanford, CA, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemoigne JL (1990) La modélisation des systèmes complexes. Dunod, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Midler C, Beaume R (2009) Project-based learning patterns for dominant design renewal: The case of electric vehicle. International Journal of Project Management, 28(2): 142-150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiba S, Graham A, Walden D (1993) A new American TQM - four practical revolutions in management. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA, US

    Google Scholar 

  • Taguchi G, Clausing D (1990) Robust quality. Harvard Business Review, 68(1): 65-75

    Google Scholar 

  • Ullman DG (2001) Robust decision-making for engineering design. Journal of Engineering Design, 12(1): 3-13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Velloso-Rodriguez K, Truchot P (2009) Classification des projets d’innovation d’après leur but d’origine. Confere’09, Marrakech, Maroc

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buet, G., Gidel, T., Millet, D. (2010). Towards a Robust Process for Integrating Innovations into Vehicle Projects. In: Heisig, P., Clarkson, P., Vajna, S. (eds) Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-199-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-199-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-198-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-199-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics