Skip to main content

Translating Cardioprotective Strategies into Clinical Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Management of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury

Abstract

The major objective of the treatment of ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients is to reduce infarct size, which is the major prognostic factor in this population. Most of the progress has consisted in improving reperfusion therapy, both by opening as quickly as possible and by preventing reocclusion of the culprit coronary artery. Basic science research used in well-described animal models allowed to clearly establish the major determinants of infarct size, i.e., area at risk, collateral flow, duration of ischemia, and timing of the protective intervention with respect to reflow. Recent reports have proven that lethal reperfusion injury exists, that it is of significant importance, and that it can be prevented by protective interventions applied immediately before reflow. Therefore, after taking care of the vessel, it is now time to better protect the muscle against lethal reperfusion injury. In spite of several past negative infarct size reduction studies, recent proof-of-concept studies have shown that infarct size reduction is possible in STEMI patients, at least in part because the major determinants of infarct size have been taken into account. Increased understanding of underlying mechanisms from animal models together with encouraging results from phase II infarct size reduction clinical trials should help us improve the design of future studies aimed at reducing infarct size in STEMI patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sans S, Kesteloot H, Kromhout D. The burden of cardiovascular diseases mortality in Europe. Task force of the European society of cardiology on cardiovascular mortality and morbidity statistics in Europe. Eur Heart J. 1997;18:1231–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Anand SS, Yusuf S. Stemming the global tsunami of cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2011;377(9765):529–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tunstall-Pedoe H, Kuulasmaa K, Mähönen M, Tolonen H, Ruokokoski E, Amouyel P. Contribution of trends in survival and coronary-event rates to changes in coronary heart disease mortality: 10-year results from 37 WHO MONICA project populations. Monitoring trends and determinants in cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 1999;353:1547–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahaffey KW, Puma JA, Barbagelata NA, et al. Adenosine as an adjunct to thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial: the Acute Myocardial Infarction STudy of ADenosine (AMISTAD) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1711–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kitakaze M, Asakura M, Kim J, J-WIND investigators, et al. Human atrial natriuretic peptide and nicorandil as adjuncts to reperfusion treatment for acute myocardial infarction (J-WIND): two randomised trials. Lancet. 2007;370:1483–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lincoff AM. Presentation of PROTECTION-AMI trial. American College of Cardiology. Scientific Services, New Orleans, Apr 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Theroux P, Chaitman BR, Danchin N, et al. Inhibition of the sodium-hydrogen exchanger with cariporide to prevent myocardial infarction in high-risk ischemic situations. Main results of the GUARDIAN trial. Guard during ischemia against necrosis (GUARDIAN) investigators. Circulation. 2000;102:3032–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mentzer Jr MR, Bartels C, Bolli R, on behalf of the EXPEDITION Study Investigators, et al. Sodium-hydrogen exchange inhibition by cariporide to reduce the risk of ischemic cardiac events in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: results of the EXPEDITION Study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1261–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Najjar SS, Rao SV, Melloni C, for the REVEAL Investigators, et al. Intravenous erythropoietin in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction REVEAL: a randomized ­controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305:1863–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wijns W, Kolh P, Danchin N, et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:2501–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbons RJ, Valeti US, Aaroz PA, Jaffe AS. The quantification of infarct size. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1533–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller TD, Christian TF, Hopfenspirger MR, Hodge DO, Gersh BJ, Gibbons RJ. Infarct size after acute myocardial infarction measured by quantitative tomographic 99mTc sestamibi imaging predicts subsequent mortality. Circulation. 1995;92:334–41.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson GF, Chu E. Expanding priorities – confronting chronic disease in countries with low income. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:209–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Randomised trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both, or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. ISIS-2 Lancet. 1988;2:349–60.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell’Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1986;1(8478):397–402.

    Google Scholar 

  16. White HD, Chew DP. Acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 2008;372:570–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gelfand EV, Cannon CP. Myocardial infarction: contemporary management strategies. J Intern Med. 2007;262:59–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Jernberg T, Johanson P, Held C, Svennblad B, Lindbäck J, Wallentin L, SWEDEHEART/RIKS-HIA. Association between adoption of evidence-based treatment and survival for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2011;305:1677–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao Z-Q, Corvera JS, Halkos ME, et al. Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol. 2003;285:H579–88.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Argaud L, Gateau-Roesch O, Raisky O, Loufouat J, Robert D, Ovize M. Postconditioning inhibits mitochondrial permeability transition. Circulation. 2005;111:194–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang X-M, Proctor JB, Cui L, Krieg T, Downey JM, Cohen MV. Multiple, brief coronary occlusions during early reperfusion protect hearts by targeting cell signaling pathways. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsang A, Hausenloy DJ, Mocanu MM, Yellon DM. Postconditioning: a form of “modified reperfusion” protects the myocardium by activating the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-Akt pathway. Circ Res. 2004;95:230–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Argaud L, Prigent AF, Chalabreysse L, Loufouat J, Lagarde M, Ovize M. Ceramide in the antiapoptotic effect of ischemic preconditioning. Am J Physiol. 2004;286:H246–51.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Gomez L, Thibault H, Gharib A, et al. Inhibition of mitochondrial permeability transition improves functional recovery and reduces mortality following acute myocardial infarction in mice. Am J Physiol. 2007;293:H1654–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kin H, Zhao ZQ, Sun HY, et al. Postconditioning attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting events in the early minutes of reperfusion. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;62:74–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Crompton M. The mitochondrial permeability transition pore and its role in cell death. Biochem J. 1999;341:233–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Halestrap AP, Clarke SJ, Javadov SA. Mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening during myocardial reperfusion – a target for cardioprotection. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;61:372–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakagawa T, Shimizu S, Watanabe T, et al. Cyclophilin D-dependent mitochondrial permeability transition regulates some necrotic but not apoptotic cell death. Nature. 2005;434:652–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Baines CP, Kaiser RA, Purcell NH, et al. Loss of cyclophilin D reveals a critical role for ­mitochondrial permeability transition in cell death. Nature. 2005;434:658–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hausenloy DJ, Maddock HL, Baxter GF, Yellon DM. Inhibiting mitochondrial permeability transition pore opening: a new paradigm for myocardial preconditioning? Cardiovasc Res. 2002;55:534–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Argaud L, Gateau-Roesch O, Muntean D, et al. Specific inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition prevents lethal reperfusion injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2005;38:367–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ovize M, Baxter GF, Di Lisa F, Working Group of Cellular Biology of Heart of European Society of Cardiology, et al. Postconditioning and protection from reperfusion injury: where do we stand? Position paper from the working group of cellular biology of the heart of the European Society of Cardiology. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;87:406–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation. 1977;56:786–94.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ovize M, Aupetit JF, Rioufol G, et al. Preconditioning reduces infarct size but accelerates time to ventricular fibrillation in the pig heart. Am J Physiol. 1995;269:H72–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Mannintveld OC, Te Lintel HM, van den Bos EJ, et al. Cardiac effects of postconditioning depend critically on the duration of index ischemia. Am J Physiol. 2007;292:H1551–60.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Ortiz-Pérez JT, Lee DC, Meyers SN, Davidson CJ, Bonow RO, Wu E. Determinants of myocardial salvage during acute myocardial infarction: evaluation with a combined angiographic and CMR myocardial salvage index. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3:491–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Graham MM, Faris PD, Ghali WA, Galbraith PD, Norris CM, Badry JT, Mitchell LB, Curtis MJ, Knudtson ML, APPROACH Investigators (Alberta Provincial Project for Outcome Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease). Validation of three myocardial jeopardy scores in a population-based cardiac catheterization cohort. Am Heart J. 2001;142:254–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ferdinandy P, Schulz R, Baxter GF. Interaction of cardiovascular risk factors with myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury, preconditioning, and postconditioning. Pharmacol Rev. 2007;76:142–54.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Staat P, Rioufol G, Piot C, et al. Postconditioning the human heart. Circulation. 2005;112:2143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Thibault H, Piot C, Staat P, et al. Long-term benefit of postconditioning. Circulation. 2008;117:1037–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Mewton N, Croisille P, Gahide G, et al. Effect of cyclosporine on left ventricular remodeling after reperfused myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:1200–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Piot C, Croisille C, Staat P, et al. Effect of cyclosporine on reperfusion injury in acute ­myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:473–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bøtker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2010;375:727–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Weaver WD, Cerqueira M, Hallstrom AP, Litwin PE, Martin JS, Kudenchuk PJ, Eisenberg M. Prehospital-initiated vs hospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy. The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial. JAMA. 1993;270:1211–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Ovize M.D., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mewton, N. et al. (2012). Translating Cardioprotective Strategies into Clinical Settings. In: Kaski, J., Hausenloy, D., Gersh, B., Yellon, D. (eds) Management of Myocardial Reperfusion Injury. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-019-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-019-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-018-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-019-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics