Rationale and Benefits of Surveillance After Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Stenting of Iliac and Femoral Arteries

  • Evan C. Lipsitz
  • George L. Berdejo


Duplex surveillance of lower extremity bypass grafts significantly improves both primary assisted and secondary patency rates.1,2 In this setting duplex ultrasound provides objective, hemodynamic data, and can provide detailed anatomic information both in terms of degree of stenosis as well as plaque characteristics and morphology. It can also be cost-effective.3 The goal of any surveillance protocol is to reduce procedural failures by detecting disease progression within the treated segment and allow for reintervention before a failure is realized. Such a protocol will ideally be cost-effective based on the assumption that the cost of reintervention is less than the cost of treating a failure of that procedure, which is likely to require a more complex intervention with potentially greater morbidity. Although reporting standards are well-established for the surveillance of lower extremity bypass grafts there are currently no such standards for surveillance after lower extremity angioplasty. Therefore, duplex surveillance protocols following angioplasty of the iliac and femoral arteries have largely been based on the concepts and results derived from duplex surveillance of lower extremity bypass grafts.


Patency Rate Primary Patency Primary Patency Rate Secondary Patency Rate Femoropopliteal Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Lundell AN, Lindblad B, Bergqvist D, et al. Femoropopliteal-crural graft patency is improved by an intensive surveillance program: A prospective, randomized study. J Vasc Surg 1995;21:26–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fasih T, Rudol G, Ashour H, et al. Surveillance versus nonsurveillance for femoro-popliteal bypass grafts. Angiology 2004;55:251–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Idu MM, Buth J, Cuypers P, et al. Economising vein-graft surveillance programs. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1998;15:432–38.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dormandy JA, Rutherford RB. Management of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). TASC Working Group. Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Concensus (TASC). J Vasc Surg 2000;31:S1–S296.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Timaran CH, Stevens SL, Freeman MB, Goldman MH. Predictors for adverse outcome after iliac angioplasty and stenting for limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:507–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kudo T, Chandra FA, Ahn SS. The effectiveness of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of critical limb ischemia: A 10-year experience. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:423–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wain RA, Berdejo G, Delvalle W, et al. Can duplex scan arterial mapping replace contrast arteriography as the test of choice before infrainguinal revascularization? J Vasc Surg 1999;29:100–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cruz J, Lipsitz EC, Berdejo GL. Diagnosis and ultrasoundguided repair of an iliac artery dissection. JVU 2004; 28:96–100.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mewissen MW, Kinney EV, Bandyk DF, et al. The role of duplex scanning versus angiography in predicting outcome after balloon angioplasty in the femoropopliteal artery. J Vasc Surg 1992;15:860–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Myers KA, Wood SR, Lee V. Vascular ultrasound surveillance after endovascular intervention for occlusive iliac artery disease. Cardiovasc Surg 2001;9:448–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ, Ohki T. The value of subintimal angioplasty in the management of critical lower extremity ischemia: Failure is not always associated with a rethreatened limb. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2004;45:231–37.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ahn SS, Rutherford RB, Becker GJ, et al. Reporting standards for lower extremity arterial endovascular procedures. Society for Vascular Surgery/International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery. J Vasc Surg 1993;17:1103–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg 1997;26(3):517–38. Erratum in J Vasc Surg 2001;33:805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lipsitz EC, Veith FJ. Femoral-popliteal-tibial occlusive disease. In: Moore W (ed). Vascular Surgery: A Comprehensive Review, 6th ed, pp. 523–547. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Company, 2002.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fisher CM, Burnett A, Makeham V, et al. Variation in measurement of ankle-brachial pressure index in routine clinical practice. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:871–75.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bray AE, Liu WG, Lewis WA, et al. Strecker stents in the femoropopliteal arteries: Value of duplex ultrasonography in restenosis assessment. J Endovasc Surg 1995;2:150–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nyamekye I, Sommerville K, Raphael M, et al. Noninvasive assessment of arterial stenoses in angioplasty surveillance: A comparison with angiography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12:471–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vroegindeweij D, Tielbeek AV, Buth J, Vos LD, van den Bosch HC. Patterns of recurrent disease after recanalization of femoropopliteal artery occlusions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997;20:257–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kinney EV, Bandyk DF, Mewissen MW, et al. Monitoring functional patency of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Arch Surg 1991;126:743–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spijkerboer AM, Nass PC, de Valois JC, et al. Iliac artery stenoses after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: Follow-up with duplex ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1996;23:691–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Back MR, Novotney M, Roth SM, et al. Utility of duplex surveillance following iliac artery angioplasty and primary stenting. J Endovasc Ther 2001;8:629–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ramaswami G, Tegos T, Nicolaides AN, et al. Ultrasonic plaque character and outcome after lower limb angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 1999;29:110–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Elatrozoy T, Nicolaides A Tegos T, et al. The effect of B-mode ultrasonic image standardisation on the echodensity of symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid bifurcation plaques. Int Angiol 1998;17:179–86.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Abbruzzese TA, Havens J, Belkin M, et al. Statin therapy is associated with improved patency of autogenous infrainguinal bypass grafts. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:1178–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Evan C. Lipsitz
    • 1
    • 2
  • George L. Berdejo
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryMontefiore Medical CenterBronxUSA
  2. 2.Vascular LaboratoryThe Albert Einstein College of MedicineBronxUSA
  3. 3.Vascular LaboratoryMontefiore Medical Center and Jack D. Weiler HospitalsBronxUSA

Personalised recommendations