Advertisement

Surface Texture Characterization and Evaluation Related to Machining

  • Georgios P. Petropoulos
  • Constantinos N. Pandazaras
  • J. Paulo Davim
Chapter

Abstract

Τhis chapter is aimed at providing current knowledge on the association of surface texture with machining, along with recent advances in surface characterization and evaluation. Various texture parameters, adopted by ISO standards or not, are described and their distinctive power is considered. Arithmetic parameters, statistical and random process functions serve as measures for rendering in-height and inlength surface characteristics and allow multiparameter analysis of the surface, something quite necessary under current high requirements for precision and operation. Theoretical models for roughness parameters and experimental trends with regard to machining conditions are discussed. Isotropy of machined surfaces is also considered and methods for surface typology are finally discussed.

Keywords

Surface Roughness Machine Process Machine Surface Surface Texture Roughness Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Dagnall Η. (1996) Exploring Surface Texture, Taylor Hobson Publishing Ltd, LeicesterGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Whitehouse D (1996) Handbook of Surface Metrology, Institute of Physics Publishing for Rank Taylor-Hobson Co., BristolGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Humienny Z. (ed.) (2001) Geometrical Product Specifications, Chapter 16: “Roughness, Waviness and Primary Profile” by L. Blunt and X. Jiang, Warsaw University Printing House, WarsawGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    MacDonald B.C. and Co Basic Components & Elements of Surface Topography http://www.bcmac.com/PDF_files/Surface%20Finish%20101.pdfGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Dietzsch M., Papenfluss K, Hartmann, T. (1998) The MOTIF-method (ISO 12085) – A suitable description for functional, manufactural and metrological requirements, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 38, No 5–6, 625–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    King T G, Houghton N E (1995) Describing distribution shape: RK and central moment approaches compared, International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 35/2, 247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Hasegawa M, Liu, J, Okuda K, Nunobiki M (1996) Calculation of the fractal dimensions of machined surface profiles, Wear, 192, 40–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Petropoulos G P Pandazaras C N, Vaxevanidis N M, Antoniadis A (2006) Multi-parameter identification and control of turned surface textures, Ιnternational Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 29, No. 1 & 2, 118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Thomas T R, Rosen B-G, Amini N, (1999) Fractal characterization of the anisotropy of rough surfaces, Wear, 232, 41–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Boothroyd G (1975) Fundamentals of Metal Machining and Machine Tools, Scripta Book Company, Washington. DCGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Armarego E J A, Brown R H (1969) The Machining of Metals, Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Petropoulos P G (1973) The effect of feed rate and of tool nose radius on the roughness of oblique finish turned surfaces, Wear, 23, 299–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Benardos P G, Vosniakos G-C (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43, 833–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Gosh A, Mallik A K (1995) Manufacturing Science, East West Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kruszynski B, van Luttervelt K A (1989) The influence of manufacturing processes on surface properties, Advanced Manufacturing Engineering, 1, 187–202Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Davim J.P. (1991) Influência das condições de corte na microgeometria das superfícies obtidas por torneamento, MSc thesis, University of Porto, Porto (in portuguese)Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    Nowicki B (1985) Multi-parameter representation of surface roughness, Wear, 102, 161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Petropoulos G, Pandazaras C, Vaxevanidis N, Ntziantzias I, Korlos A, (2007) Selecting subsets of mutually uncorrelated surface roughness parameters in turning, International Journal of Computational Materials Science and Surface Engineering, 1, Nr. 1, 114–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. Kalpakjian (2006) Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, 5th edn, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Peklenik J (1967) Investigation of the surface typology, Annals of the CIRP, Vol. 15Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Whitehouse D J (1978) Beta functions for surface typologie?, Annals of the CIRP, 27, No. 1, 539–553Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Peters J, Vanherck P, Sastrodinoto M. (1979) Assessment of surface typology analysis techniques, Annals of the CIRP, 28, No. 25, 39–553Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Georgios P. Petropoulos
    • 1
  • Constantinos N. Pandazaras
    • 1
  • J. Paulo Davim
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Industrial EngineeringUniversity of ThessalyVolosGreece
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options