Advertisement

Science, Technology, and Reality in The Matrix Online and Tabula Rasa

  • William Sims Bainbridge
Chapter
Part of the Human-Computer Interaction Series book series (HCIS)

Abstract

All virtual worlds possess implicit theories of the nature of reality and of the central values of human life, but the The Matrix Online (MxO) and Tabula Rasa (TR) are notable for having especially well-developed philosophical motivations. Extensive participant-observation research in both revealed that they postulate hidden realities beneath the world of appearances, shared a concern over whether technology would liberate or enslave humanity, and offered players distinctive programming languages with which they could empower themselves. Avatars in both were protean, in different ways capable of evolving along multiple lines of development, and operating secondary avatars that provide challenging metaphors of the ways humans exploit each other. MxO draws heavily upon European theories of the social construction of reality and false consciousness, whereas TR draws upon the ideology of the spaceflight social movement and went so far as to transport the avatars to the International Space Station orbiting the real world.

Keywords

Virtual World International Space Station False Consciousness Stick Figure Decimal Expansion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bainbridge, W. S. (1976). The spaceflight revolution. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Bainbridge, W. S. (2008). Computational affective sociology. In Affect and emotion in HCI, edited by C. Peter & R. Beale. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L. & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Capek, K. (1923). R. U. R. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Co.Google Scholar
  6. Durkheim, E. (1893). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  7. Engels, F. (1893). “Letter to Franz Mehring.” Retrieved September 15, 2008 (http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1893/letters/93_07_14.htm).
  8. Ferrara, L. (1996). “Schopenhauer on music as the embodiment of will” pp. 183-199 in Schopenhauer, philosophy, and the arts, edited by D. Jacquette. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gale, H. (1888). Schopenhauer’s metaphysics of music. New Englander and Yale Review, 48, 362-368.Google Scholar
  10. Garriott, R. (British, General) (Ed.) (2007). Welcome to the AFS: Allied free sentients official field manual. Austin, TX: Destination Games.Google Scholar
  11. Irwin, W. (ed). (2002). The matrix and philosophy: Welcome to the desert of the real. Chicago, IL: Open Court.Google Scholar
  12. Lawrence, M. (2004). Like a splinter in your mind: The philosophy behind the matrix trilogy. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Lévi-Strauss, C. (1970). The raw and the cooked. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  14. Lifton, R. J. (1971). Protean man. Archives of general psychiatry, 24, 298-304.Google Scholar
  15. Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia: An introduction to the sociology of knowledge. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
  16. McCubbin, C. (2005). The matrix online: Prima official game guide. Roseville, CA: Prima Games.Google Scholar
  17. Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Nietzsche, F. W. (1918). The genealogy of morals. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar
  19. Parsons, T. & Shils, E. A. (eds). (1951). Toward a general theory of action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Picard, R. (1997). Affective computing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Rajlich, V. (2004). Software cultures. pp. 659-663 in Berkshire encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, edited by W.S. Bainbridge, Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire.Google Scholar
  22. Schopenhauer, A. (1883-1886). The world as will and idea. London: Trübner.Google Scholar
  23. Thrasher, F. (1927). The Gang. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Wood, C., Storr, J., & Reich, P. A. (1992). Blissymbol reference guide. Toronto, Canada: Blissymbolics communication international.Google Scholar
  25. Yeffeth, G. (ed). (2003). Taking the red pill: Science, philosophy and religion in the matrix. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Sims Bainbridge
    • 1
  1. 1.VirginiaUSA

Personalised recommendations